Let's be fair to the Guardian (not that I worry about its feelings).
Just for the record, I never meant to be unfair to anybody (though I also have no concern for the Guardian's feelings to speak of.) I wasn't suggesting that the ex-President's domestic blunder was on the same level of shame as the Guardian's death knell for Bond.
The skepticism in that article is completely justified, but then for the same reason a humorous look at the pre and post CR articles would be equally justified. You, Dodge and the Guardian I'm sure we're not the only folks hearing the Taps theme slowly take the place of the Barry Bond theme. Had I been as "Bond aware" then as I am now, I probably would have agreed. But as the case was, I never thought that far ahead. I suppose my stance then was that as long as Bond had a pulse (= movies continue to be made) that eventually he'd come around again. What's more, my distaste for the Brosnan era has festered since TWINE. Up to that time I had no particular quarrel with him or his films, and since then it's been a slow decay. (Pretty well rotting off the bones now.)
That was a long ramble to say very little. Sorry...
Judo, no apology's required. It's easy and natural to look at past predictions that have been proven false, and smile. The infamous Harry Truman is defeated headline now seems total lunacy. But to a newspaper running on a deadline, and forced to play the odds, the gamble was sensible. Impish Luck gave them the dunce cap, as it did the Guardian. So, let's smile at the Guardian while we understand.
new post on Craig's stunts has been moved below. Placed here in error. Sorry.