What about Bond's Housekeeper?
#1
Posted 14 February 2007 - 04:13 PM
#2
Posted 14 February 2007 - 04:35 PM
#3
Posted 14 February 2007 - 04:39 PM
Still don
#4
Posted 14 February 2007 - 04:42 PM
Jeeves + Wooster + Bond = hilarious hijinx.
#5
Posted 14 February 2007 - 04:50 PM
#6
Posted 14 February 2007 - 05:05 PM
I'd rather not see May, personally, as I like to keep Bond's personal life at a solid remove. I realise it would be a Flemingian touch but I like Bond more cold and distant. For the same reasons I don't want to see where he lives, I need the mystery.
Ah why not? Don't ya want to see all the IKEA furniture he owns?
I think having May in there would be fun. She is such a great character. But I agree, there needs to be a good reason for it.
#7
Posted 14 February 2007 - 05:24 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2007 - 05:35 PM
#9
Posted 14 February 2007 - 05:49 PM
I've married men knowing them less than I know James Bond . No. I really, really don't want to see that kind of detail about his life. It's this odd little quirk I have.I'd rather not see May, personally, as I like to keep Bond's personal life at a solid remove. I realise it would be a Flemingian touch but I like Bond more cold and distant. For the same reasons I don't want to see where he lives, I need the mystery.
Ah why not? Don't ya want to see all the IKEA furniture he owns?
It is a rather old-fashioned concept but somehow I can't see James Bond getting down and scrubbing his own toilet or hoovering.Could well slow the film down.. and to be honest I'm not sure newBond, in 2008, is the kind of chap who needs his house 'keeping'.
#10
Posted 14 February 2007 - 06:45 PM
#11
Posted 14 February 2007 - 10:32 PM
It is a rather old-fashioned concept but somehow I can't see James Bond getting down and scrubbing his own toilet or hoovering.Could well slow the film down.. and to be honest I'm not sure newBond, in 2008, is the kind of chap who needs his house 'keeping'.
But that's what you do in the military- I think it's exactly what a proud soldier would do.
#12
Posted 14 February 2007 - 10:38 PM
#13
Posted 14 February 2007 - 10:51 PM
It may be intresting. But I dont think a housekeeper fits the Bond-character. He seems more like a person who constantly move around or use a secret adress.
Considering May is a Fleming creation, and he also created Bond. I think it suits the Bond character just fine
#14
Posted 15 February 2007 - 09:28 AM
#15
Posted 22 February 2007 - 10:30 PM
To paraphrase Cubby: "we bought the damn books, use them"
Edited by SecretAgent007, 22 February 2007 - 10:33 PM.
#16
Posted 23 February 2007 - 02:43 AM
I also don't think we really ever need a scene in Bond's flat anytime soon. I just don't know what it would add. It was kind of fun seeing it in DN and LALD, but what did it really do for those films? ]
Put Bond where he belongs -- in the field and dispense with whatever will slow the film down at the expense of a token Fleming nod.
#17
Posted 23 February 2007 - 02:54 AM
I mean, does Bond become more wealthy due to windfalls gained over the course of his missions?
Or, is there inherited wealth from his parents and aunt already in place?
#18
Posted 24 February 2007 - 11:47 PM
#19
Posted 25 February 2007 - 12:01 AM
#20
Posted 25 February 2007 - 12:23 AM
But once he has grieved, Bond springs into action, and vows to hunt down the threat behind the spies who think a melancholic Bond makes for a grittier one and will do anything to make that happen, so with his trusty Walther PPK he leaves MI6, puts on some rouge (why do people always spell 'rogue' like this?) and faces his toughest mission yet. This fall, see the light shining behind Daniel Craig's ears once again as he stares grimly into the camera in
REVENGE ON THOSE WHO KILLED MY HOUSEKEEPER
sorry,
COMPLIMENTS OF MAY
no, sorry,
MAID IN SCOTLAND
or perhaps even
DEATH FOR BREAKFAST
(Not yet rated but will probably be a PG like all the other ones, even though he actually rapes a nun in this one)'
#21
Posted 25 February 2007 - 04:34 AM
That's if theres room. I don't want Moneypenny and Q back for Bond 22. If they go with Ponsonby I'd only hope they start a new type of relationship, not a Moneypenny clone...
#22
Posted 25 February 2007 - 11:42 AM
Still don
#23
Posted 10 March 2007 - 11:39 AM
Like others said: Please don't squeeze her in just or the sake of it.
#24
Posted 10 March 2007 - 12:36 PM
#25
Posted 10 March 2007 - 06:12 PM