
The Experience of Love
#31
Posted 05 January 2007 - 08:43 PM
[/quote]
What does his being French have to do with anything? You have me worried there. I know nothing about him personally, so I can't be a judge of his ego. It's a safe assumption though that he had Eon's blessing to do something radically different. And that's just what he did. Dated? In comparison with previous Bond soundtracks, his was postively rad. And I loved the score--which, actually, imo, gave Brozza more of an edge than that gentle soul possesses. I hated the lyrics to the end song. But hopefully the few of us who welcomed something different can remain in the warm, loving bosom of the great Bond family.
#32
Posted 05 January 2007 - 11:57 PM
I've never thought of it this way but it might fit better in a video game. Personally, I listened to it once & that was enough for me.My opinion of Serra's score was that it would have been cool for a MegaDrive or N64 game, but for a major film... no dice.
#33
Posted 06 January 2007 - 02:28 AM
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is the "song" is a piece of self-indulgent crap that has absolutely no business ending, or being a part of a Bond film. The end credits should send you out of the theatre on a high note, not that wallowing sap. To this day, when I pop in a Bond DVD, GE remains the only one I won't watch the end credits. I think Eric Serra was the worst thing to ever happen to the franchise.
No argument, there.
To be perfectly honest, the lyrics made me gag. But, on the bright side, I've always loved Eric Serra's score. Though it's hated by many members, it struck me as right and refreshing, heralding what was meant to be a hip new Bond.
Which means it will age and date much quicker than more classic sounding Bond material. It's fascinating how they went in the opposite and far superior direction of the more timeless work of David Arnold for Tomorrow Never Dies.
It makes me throw up in my mouth. Choosing Eric Serra was a mistake and letting him sing an end titles song was an even bigger mistake.
Ditto. Serra's music seriously impairs the film. I wish there was an option on the DVD where we could delete his score. The only good parts were when Bond meets Xenia at the casino in Monte Carlo, when he confronts 006/"Janus" for the first time, some of the scenes after the massacre at Severnaya and the tank chase(which Serra never scored).
My opinion of Serra's score was that it would have been cool for a MegaDrive or N64 game, but for a major film... no dice.
Serra's score indeed would make a better video game score than movie score.
#34
Posted 06 January 2007 - 12:37 PM
[/quote]
Him being French has nothing to do with it and Serra's work on such French classics as LEON, LA FEMME NIKITA and SUBWAY is vital to those films. However, when he gurgles that closing song from GOLDENEYE he is very much apeing the Serge Gainsbourg style of talking-singing which is very French and very dated. The score has very few melodic merits. It's a Yahama tombola of synths, kettle drums and more synths.
Don't get me wrong. I'm all up for different. But it has to be 'good' different. These are Bond films not XXX IV. I too have no knowledge of his personality or indeed his ego, but in my opinion, the fact he warbled the 'Experience Of Love' himself speaks volumes.
#35
Posted 06 January 2007 - 01:26 PM
No, but it helps.Just because it has John Barry all over it doesn't make it a good song.
Yes. I think you can consider both 'You Know My Name' and 'The Experience of Love' as very "successful"... if less Bond is your cup of tea.Perhaps it ["Only Myself To Blame"] should have tried to be less of a Bond song (in a way YOU KNOW MY NAME has successfully achieved) and reflected the film and its' narrative and not who was in the music studio canteen that lunchtime. It's a terrible piece of music. It's like being aurally suffocated by clingfilm. And the instrumental version in the film is no better which really throws light on a bad song.
#36
Posted 06 January 2007 - 11:15 PM
Yes. I think you can consider both 'You Know My Name' and 'The Experience of Love' as very "successful"... if less Bond is your cup of tea.
I couldn't agree with you any more regarding the one and only quality that 'The Experience of Love' enjoys, but what is it that makes 'You Know My Name' less Bondian by your standards?
#37
Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:32 AM
#38
Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:58 AM
Edited by mrsbonds_ppk, 07 January 2007 - 08:59 AM.
#39
Posted 07 January 2007 - 10:47 AM
#40
Posted 07 January 2007 - 11:06 AM
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is the "song" is a piece of self-indulgent crap that has absolutely no business ending, or being a part of a Bond film. The end credits should send you out of the theatre on a high note, not that wallowing sap. To this day, when I pop in a Bond DVD, GE remains the only one I won't watch the end credits. I think Eric Serra was the worst thing to ever happen to the franchise.
Totally agree.
Andy
#41
Posted 07 January 2007 - 06:22 PM
I quite like the idea of an "electronic" Bond score but there are people who do this sort of thing far better; Jan Hammer, Jean Michel-Jarre, Tangerine Dream etc. Not that I'm saying any of them should have done a Bond score.
exactly..... I'm a big fan of some of Tangerine Dream's stuff.... but they should NEVER come near a Bond score....
#42
Posted 08 January 2007 - 10:57 PM
I could also just be subconsciously against Serra since he missed putting a segment of the Bond theme into the pre-credits when the plane pulls from the nosedive and swoops over the exploding factory. (If you put in the Bond theme from when he pulls out the British Parachute in Spy Who Loved Me after skiing off the mountain, it fits in the GoldenEye plane scene perfectly.)
Like some others here, I think Bond movies should end on a high note. Even the downer ones like Casino Royale and OHMSS give you a rousing Bond Theme to get you excited again.
Personally though, I don't like any reprise song in the end credits, or a new one for that matter. I think "Surrender" is the only exception. I was thrilled that in TWINE it just had a 4 minute James Bond theme for the end credits. That's how they should all end.
#43
Posted 12 January 2007 - 11:55 PM
The score has very few melodic merits. It's a Yahama tombola of synths, kettle drums and more synths.
Yes.
I think GoldenEye sounds horribly dated, even more so than The Spy Who Loved Me and For Your Eyes Only, who, while not sounding very fresh, are still very vibrant. And that's really something, considering GE just happened 10 years ago.
But in my opinion, the dated sound isn't GoldenEye's biggest problem. It just sounds really really bad. Like you said, a score assembled from various, low quality synth effects. Had it been recorded with high quality synths and maybe (what a thought) even with more real orchestra, it may actually have added up to something. Not much, but still.
#44
Posted 13 January 2007 - 09:06 PM
To be honest, the only cue I actually really like on the soundtrack is "Run, Shoot, and Jump".
#45
Posted 14 January 2007 - 03:42 AM
To be honest, the only cue I actually really like on the soundtrack is "Run, Shoot, and Jump".
Not a fan of The GoldenEye Overture? That's one of the better ones in my opinion.
#46
Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:00 AM
It is also a total downer better suited for a funeral.
#47
Posted 14 January 2007 - 08:36 AM
#48
Posted 14 January 2007 - 09:09 AM
#49
Posted 14 January 2007 - 09:51 AM
I like it. It's no worse than some of the other songs that ended a Bond film. "If You Asked Me To", for instance. How is that one any more fitting? Because it was Patti Labelle and made famous by Celine Dion?
Because it's a better song, and much better than the Dion version too. Of course, that's just my opinion.
I think you have a good point about Serra vs Arnold though.
#50
Posted 15 January 2007 - 02:42 PM
Not to say either one is better than the other, Serra's isn't my favorite and neither are Arnold's, but Arnold's soundtracks all sound the same to me, though some are certainly better than others. The best thing about Casino Royale's music was the fact that Arnold was forced not to use the James Bond theme till the end. Can you imagine had that not been the case? Arnold promised us something fresh and new for Royale, but I didn't see it. A letdown, though not a bad soundtrack. Certainly not as edgy and fresh as Serra's which I think works great within the context of the film, but not so much on its lonesome.
A huge part of the hatred against Eric Serra also comes from him not respecting the series' past at all. Serra said the Bond theme and the established Bond sound was too old- fashioned and didn't work at all today.
And along comes David Arnold and pulls it off! You can think about Arnold whatever you want, and I'm not exactly fond of Casino Royale either, but at least he honours the past.
And for that reason alone, David Arnold will always be on the top of my list, and Serra at the rock bottom.
Arnold, while not exactly altering much from Bond film to Bond film, did create the definite James Bond sound of the new century with Tomorrow Never Dies; and that sound also stays within the series, and that's completely different from the reason Serra get a lot of beatings. Serra composed three almost identical scores for three completely different films (one of them being GoldenEye).
It's always easy saying "the score works" when the music fits the picture and gives something (not much, but still) to it. Especially when you have no alternative at hand.
Serra offered a solution, but let me throw this at you: is it the best? Is it even appropriate? And I'm sorry to say (not really) that it isn't.
Sure, there were other composers in the history of the series that brought something new to the table: Hamlish, Martin, Conti, Kamen. But Serra wasn't in the same position those earlier composers were, he had entirely different targets to hit. This wasn't your average "Barry's busy, so we have to fill the gap somehow" score - this was the resurrection of James Bond, the launch of 007 into a new century, a new era.
The Bond music had to reflect that.
And all Eric Serra came up with was a rehash of his own stuff, which by the way was old-fashioned even by 1995- standards.
#51
Posted 21 January 2007 - 06:14 PM
#52
Posted 21 January 2007 - 07:31 PM
#53
Posted 22 January 2007 - 05:36 AM
#54
Posted 24 January 2007 - 05:56 AM
I really like David Arnold's work. I hope be drops the techno sound and sticks to the orchesral sound.
#55
Posted 24 January 2007 - 11:41 AM
#56
Posted 24 January 2007 - 08:48 PM
#57
Posted 25 January 2007 - 01:01 AM
#58
Posted 25 January 2007 - 09:35 AM
Ouch! My ears is bleeding!