I felt that they could have developed his character a bit more. Or, are we to assume that he'll take a more active role in the next film.
Edited by doubler83, 17 November 2006 - 08:10 PM.
Posted 17 November 2006 - 08:09 PM
Edited by doubler83, 17 November 2006 - 08:10 PM.
Posted 17 November 2006 - 08:15 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 08:16 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 09:41 PM
Edited by Fro, 17 November 2006 - 09:55 PM.
Posted 17 November 2006 - 10:55 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 11:26 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 01:06 AM
Felix didn't really have a much bigger part in the book, as Fro said. He was just in it more but what he actually contributed to the plot was about as much as he did in the movie. Dont get me wrong, I was dissapointed to not have more of him but hopefully in the next one he'll have a more integral role in the story.
Posted 18 November 2006 - 08:24 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 08:35 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 08:45 PM
Well, the United States isn't exactly strapped for cash. That's all.This got a huge burst of laughter from the audience however maybe I am reading into it too much but I don't see the humour in that line. Explanations please?
Posted 18 November 2006 - 08:49 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 09:22 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 11:30 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 11:34 PM
I'll say it...yeah.
Felix didn't really have a much bigger part in the book, as Fro said. He was just in it more but what he actually contributed to the plot was about as much as he did in the movie. Dont get me wrong, I was dissapointed to not have more of him but hopefully in the next one he'll have a more integral role in the story.
So are you saying that you want Bond 22 to be Live and Let die?