I'm sorry Zorin, Roger Moore himself has said he never took the Bond part seriously. So I cannot take his performance seriously. To me he always had this incredible patronising nature about his performance. Also despite their faults both Goldeneye and TWINE are far better made films than AVTAK. Both made by directors who have credible track records. John Glen since leaving Bond has done virtually nothing.
What - more patronising than Pierce Brosnan and his amateur dramatics with Sophie Marceau?! GOLDENEYE is a pale remake of A VIEW TO A KILL (granted, the Bond series is not entirely innocent of remaking itself now and then). At least A VIEW TO A KILL had a subtler script with Maibaum's wit and drive apparent at all times. THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH just felt like a Christmas episode of DEMPSEY AND MAKEPEACE (M being kidnapped, Denise Richards outdoing Tanya Roberts on the dumb blonde stakes and lazy cultural references to the Millennium Dome and the Thames shoe-horned in for no other narrative reason than location clearances were granted by media-leaching Labour councillors).
And because John Glen never made his stamp on the history of cinema post-Bond doesn't mean his 007 directorial efforts should be ignored. The same could easily be said for Terence Young, Peter Hunt, Guy Hamilton and Lee Tamahori.
We're not going to agree on this one, are we? (!). I will say though that I remember A VIEW TO A KILL being released and how astute, cool and contemporary the film was marketed, branded and discussed whereas THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH and GOLDENEYE felt like BOND TV Movies ticking the 007 acoutrements wish list rather than crafting intriguing screenplays worthy of Brosnan's verve to wake up the role.
Edited by Zorin Industries, 12 January 2007 - 12:11 PM.