Octopussy - the most FUN Bond movie?
#61
Posted 26 October 2006 - 12:21 AM
There are some very serious and dramatic scenes but for sheer entertainment it's up there with the best. It really makes me smile. (even though I groan about the tarzan yell, "sit!" and all the animals that attack Bond when in India!!!
#62
Posted 26 October 2006 - 07:04 PM
#63
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:05 PM
Anybody got some pics of that sheep head?
#64
Posted 27 October 2006 - 12:01 AM
One of the best parts of that movie is the stuffed sheep head.
Anybody got some pics of that sheep head?
LOL, yes, and I think it inspired the meal scene in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.
#65
Posted 05 November 2006 - 03:02 PM
Like people have said. It's one of the best Moore Bonds and proablably the most fun
#66
Posted 05 November 2006 - 06:46 PM
I've always thought that Octopussy has all the best ingredients. The villains are excellent. Louis Jordan and Steven berkoff in paticular. The stunts are as good as it gets. India's an amazing location, yet the scenes in Germany are so much darker..and faster paced. Loads of girls. I'm surprised at the the negtive reactions to Kristina Waybourne. To be honest shes such a striking presence in the film that shes one of the best things about it, her actings not great but I'd say it's good enough.
Like people have said. It's one of the best Moore Bonds and proablably the most fun
I agree with you. Her acting is not that great, but she had a magnificent screen presence.
#67
Posted 06 November 2006 - 12:38 AM
I agree with you. Her acting is not that great, but she had a magnificent screen presence.
I liked her little Octopussy......
#68
Posted 06 November 2006 - 11:07 AM
I agree with you. Her acting is not that great, but she had a magnificent screen presence.
I liked her little Octopussy......
If theres ever been a time I've wanted to be Roger Moore....thats it!
#69
Posted 06 November 2006 - 12:40 PM
I mean look at the fantastic tuk-tuk chase and subsequential set peices after, it's total fun and only done with the sense of realism and danger Roger Moore can pull off in 007's shoes!
#70
Posted 07 November 2006 - 12:34 AM
Edited by Colossus, 07 November 2006 - 12:34 AM.
#71
Posted 07 November 2006 - 05:33 AM
Moonraker is the most fun i have with Moore's Bonds.
I find it great fun, (and really love the globe-trotting), until the space scenes.
#72
Posted 08 November 2006 - 06:17 AM
Edited by Colossus, 08 November 2006 - 06:18 AM.
#73
Posted 08 December 2006 - 12:34 AM
#74
Posted 08 December 2006 - 12:44 AM
I always recommend this film to people who didn't like Roger Moore because he played the role too light. He is very effective in the scene with Steven Berkoff on the train as well as the scene at the circus where he tries to tell everyone about the bomb. This shows how good an actor he really was.
#75
Posted 08 December 2006 - 01:13 AM
I always recommend this film to people who didn't like Roger Moore because he played the role too light. He is very effective in the scene with Steven Berkoff on the train as well as the scene at the circus where he tries to tell everyone about the bomb. This shows how good an actor he really was.
I agree - what about when he kills Grischka with his own knife? "And this is for 009...". Excellent stuff.
Yeah, I agree, I like Moore when he was playing it serious - like when he kicks Loque and his car off the cliff in FYEO, and when he hears of Tibbett's death in AVTAK.
#76
Posted 02 January 2007 - 03:36 PM
Blimey, it's a good thing James Brolin never got the part, isn't it?
#77
Posted 02 January 2007 - 07:46 PM
Blimey, it's a good thing James Brolin never got the part, isn't it?
Yes, it is a good thing that James Brolin never got the part. Looking at his screentest it's obvious he was not suitable for the role of James Bond. Having said that, I think he was very good in films like Westworld and Capricorn One.
Edited by Moore Not Less, 02 January 2007 - 07:47 PM.
#78
Posted 02 January 2007 - 07:54 PM
#79
Posted 02 January 2007 - 11:30 PM
Edited by Agent 0015, 02 January 2007 - 11:33 PM.
#80
Posted 03 January 2007 - 12:09 AM
#81
Posted 03 January 2007 - 12:27 AM
Any Bond movie that is classified as being a "fun" movie is not worth the time it takes to watch it.
But you have nothing against "Fun" in general?
I am always surprised that there are Bond fans who really don't like certain movies - luckily for me, I like all 21.
#82
Posted 03 January 2007 - 02:59 AM
I recently read where Roger said that the Octopussy production was a fun and happy one to be involved with. It shows in the movie.
It definitely does. Octopussy is one of Roger's 2 or 3 best Bond films and is in my top 10. It definitely provides a lot of fun. I think it's the best John Glen-directed Moore Bond film and my 2nd favorite 1980s Bond film after The Living Daylights.
Yes, maybe it should have been Roger's last movie.
No maybes. It definitely should have been Roger's last. A View to a Kill was a very limp swansong for Moore. Yet I would not have wanted AVTAK(without a major script rewrite, anyway) to have been either Dalton's or Brosnan's first Bond film.
#83
Posted 03 January 2007 - 03:16 AM
However, I do admit that Octopussy was a great fun romp through Bond land. It definitely made the most of India, and as others have said, Louis Jordan's "Octopussy... Octopussy" Delivery at the end never gets old.
#84
Posted 03 January 2007 - 06:19 AM
A lot of claims are made that the Roger Moore era was right for the times. I have always disagreed with that. There are plenty of quality serious movies during the same time. It was the producers' capitulation to other trends that led to the garbage of the Roger Moore era. They lost sight of the fact that Bond movies used to set trends. They did not follow other trends. The early movies provided solid entertainment without the sacrifice to the totally absurd. And I will alway choose the Bond movies that provide the cool without the crap. If I want fun, I'll watch a movie that is written to be a comedy. I will never again watch the substandard antics of a second rate actor displaying tired attempts at juvenile comedy in movies that are former creative shadows of their predecessors.
Edited by RJJB, 03 January 2007 - 01:10 PM.
#85
Posted 03 January 2007 - 08:54 AM
Maud Adams is my favourite Roger Bond girl. She and Roger Moore had great chemistry, more so, I think, than he had with any other actress in a Bond movie, maybe because they are good friends off screen?
I think that Octopussy and Live And Let Die are the most unusual of all Bond movies. They had interesting characters and locations, unusual gadgets and action. It was a fun movie for sure, but not my favourite Roger Bond. I can't quite figure this out, but for some reason, it just never really stuck with me like his other Bond movies.
Yeah, I don't get it.
It's easy to sit through because the plot details (or lack thereof) make each viewing interesting. But when it's over, I forget it. Call me crazy, but I think the strange thing about OP is that Roger and Maude have all of their clothes on each time we see them in bed.
TMWTGG had more erotic tension between those two.
#86
Posted 03 January 2007 - 11:32 AM
You didn't get that in "Never Say Never Again".
#87
Posted 03 January 2007 - 12:32 PM
The only thing that redeemed this film for me, in any way, was the chemistry between Moore and Maud Adams.
For me, the funnest Bond movie is TSWLM. Just plain, good fun.
#88
Posted 03 January 2007 - 08:34 PM
#89
Posted 04 January 2007 - 08:28 PM
#90
Posted 04 January 2007 - 08:31 PM