Risico Petition
#1
Posted 01 August 2006 - 06:04 PM
#2
Posted 01 August 2006 - 06:25 PM
#3
Posted 01 August 2006 - 07:33 PM
An admirable sentiment, but I'd prefer to think that the powers-that-be pay no attention to any online petitions. I hope they don't, anyway.
First rule of writing anything with a fanbase is to ignore the fanbase
We make good points and we come up with some good ideas, but in the end, we don't know what the hell we want. 50% of Bond fans want Bond to have Moorish qualities, while the other 50% wants to kick the out of the first 50% for even coming up with that idea.
#4
Posted 01 August 2006 - 07:38 PM
#5
Posted 01 August 2006 - 07:44 PM
I think a petition sent to Eon would just motivate them to do the opposite of what it asks. (Kind of sounds like a joke, doesn
#6
Posted 01 August 2006 - 07:59 PM
[quote name='zencat' post='580275' date='1 August 2006 - 14:38']
I think a petition sent to Eon would just motivate them to do the opposite of what it asks. (Kind of sounds like a joke, doesn
#7
Posted 02 August 2006 - 04:24 PM
#8
Posted 05 August 2006 - 10:20 AM
after hearing the reason for the title i think there could be better and more exiting titles produced by EON
Iceheart
#9
Posted 05 August 2006 - 04:16 PM
Besides, how bad would it be if they made their decisions based on the whim of a bunch of facless people online? I think that would do more to dilute the character than anything else.
#10
Posted 05 August 2006 - 04:23 PM
#11
Posted 05 August 2006 - 10:12 PM
#12
Posted 05 August 2006 - 11:50 PM
I think a petition sent to Eon would just motivate them to do the opposite of what it asks.
Actually, I was among a group of fans on the alt. site in the first couple of months of 1998 (when the "rumored" title of the next movie was 'Pressure Point') lobbying hard for the next Bond movie to be titled THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.
Now, I don't know if it was just an amazing coincidence or that EON had its ears to the ground but the next movie ended up finally getting the title The World is not Enough.
#13
Posted 06 August 2006 - 03:04 PM
#14
Posted 27 August 2006 - 08:29 AM
I do however, love Fleming's chapter title 'Death is so Permanent'
#15
Posted 27 August 2006 - 09:31 PM
The Death Collector is good.
#16
Posted 27 August 2006 - 10:41 PM
I used to post regularly in alt.fan.james-bond as well. In fact, I made a post about the title "TWINE" being considered for "Bond 18".Actually, I was among a group of fans on the alt. site in the first couple of months of 1998 (when the "rumored" title of the next movie was 'Pressure Point') lobbying hard for the next Bond movie to be titled THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.
Now, I don't know if it was just an amazing coincidence or that EON had its ears to the ground but the next movie ended up finally getting the title The World is not Enough.
#17
Posted 27 August 2006 - 10:45 PM
Actually, I was among a group of fans on the alt. site in the first couple of months of 1998 (when the "rumored" title of the next movie was 'Pressure Point') lobbying hard for the next Bond movie to be titled THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.
Now, I don't know if it was just an amazing coincidence or that EON had its ears to the ground but the next movie ended up finally getting the title The World is not Enough.
It was probably more to do with Raymond Benson. The original title for The Facts of Death was The World is not enough, but allegedly the publishers rejected it for not being Bond-like, so he just put the TWINE title on the last chapter instead. Then a year later a Bond film called The World is Not Enough went into production
#18
Posted 28 August 2006 - 02:32 AM
I don't see the point of this petition. I like the title Risico very much, but they should only use it if it fits the scrpt properly.
#19
Posted 28 August 2006 - 02:36 AM
I don't see the point of this petition. I like the title Risico very much, but they should only use it if it fits the scrpt properly.
Yeah its a bit silly. They should give the film a title that fits the film, not try to shoehorn the word Risico in there somewhere just because it came from Fleming.
In any case, 16 signatures after a month? Yeah, take that, EON!
#20
Posted 28 August 2006 - 02:37 AM
I think Eon is going to call Bond 22 whatever they want to call it (and maybe they've already decided). They know the title Risico exists, no one needs to tell them about it. It's gonna be what it's gonna be. I just hope to see it at the end of CR. But don't tell them to do that either.
I don't like the title. I've already applied for the RisicoNotBond22.com domain.
There are so many good titles, chapter titles, phrases or Flemingesque phrases out there that could be used. "Risico" is one of the worst titles, and wasn't it from the FYEO short story, where Colombo was trying to pronounce the word "risk"? It's been years since I've read the novel(s).
How about: Shamelady....Shatterhand....Brokenclaw....Icebreaker....Nobody Lives Forever (my favorite)...The Death Collector...
Shamelady would be quite appropriate for a follow up to Casino Royale, come to think of it. I'd like to see Risico used at a title where it makes sense, though.
#21
Posted 28 August 2006 - 12:51 PM
#22
Posted 30 August 2006 - 11:09 AM
10. Roger Moore Yes even though the story was part of my 1981 film For your eyes only i still say thery should do it. and Give Craig a chance.
#23
Posted 30 August 2006 - 07:01 PM
10. Roger Moore Yes even though the story was part of my 1981 film For your eyes only i still say thery should do it. and Give Craig a chance.
Wonder if any of the other Bonds are going to sign as well.