Could Timothy Dalton play James Bond again?
#1
Posted 13 May 2002 - 05:48 PM
#2
Posted 13 May 2002 - 05:55 PM
#3
Posted 13 May 2002 - 06:18 PM
#4
Posted 13 May 2002 - 09:19 PM
I think the Dalton fans of CBN should design a "Bring Back Dalton" petition or something for everyone to sign and then send it to the Bond film producers aswell as Dalton's fan club/official website. I think its a great idea - anyone up for it?
#5
Posted 14 May 2002 - 09:12 AM
#6
Posted 14 May 2002 - 09:47 PM
However Dalton should not be doing a film set after Brosnan's films.
#7
Posted 14 May 2002 - 11:22 PM
Too old
#8
Posted 14 May 2002 - 11:23 PM
#9
Posted 24 May 2002 - 03:12 PM
He, however, should not play bond agian.
Too Old...
...I'd rather see a Hugh Jackman, an Ewan McGregor, an Adrian Paul, a Clive Owen or someone of that age group have a go at the role between 2006/2008 to 2016/2019
by the way....
--------------------------------------------------
[quote]General Koskov (14 May, 2002 10:47 p.m.):
I think Dalton should play ... in a remake of one of those awful '70s films. Diamonds Are Forever, or Live and Let Die, or The Man with the Golden Gun, or Moonraker
-------------------------
i'll have to disagree with some of what you said there, my friend.
Moonraker, in the summer of 1979 when i saw it on the BIG SCREEN, was a GLOBE-TROTTING EPIC!
If they 'remade' it, which they wouldnt, it would be EXTREMELY COSTLY. I'd preffer if they had a DVD version that cut out two or three "silly" bits form the original version. Such as jaws trying to fly in the mind-blowing pre-titles and the accompanying comedic music. or the double-taking pigeon.
------------------------
------------------------
are all (in my not-so-humble opinion) viable candidates for remakes because they are unfaithful to good novels, and Connery/Moore seemed to be playing a screwy version of Bond (perhaps not in Moonraker, but whatever).
------------------------
Oh...and TSWLM was TOTTALY FAITHFUL to the novel? Right?
sorry. you were referring to "GOOD" novels. I love Flemings work, but he wasnt a GOD! DAF, the book, had a lot of decent bits to it especially the first few pages of "the pipeline opens" with the scorpion...but, dare i say it, the movie (which i agree is one of the weakest in the series) is AN IMPROVEMENT on the Fleming plot and characters, in my humble opinion.....
#10
Posted 24 May 2002 - 07:28 AM
He had his shot.
#11
Posted 23 May 2002 - 11:59 AM
MGM and Eon don't make the James Bond films for us hardcore fans and purists, they make them for the general public, and 99% of the teens-to-mid-twenties target audience probably have never even heard of Dalton.
File hopes of a Dalton comeback alongside all of the other old chestnuts that keep getting revived as rumours in the film industry, such as Sean Connery playing a future Bond villain, or Indiana Jones 4's gonna happen.
#12
Posted 25 May 2002 - 06:45 AM
I also agree that Diamonds Are Forever was certainly not the material Eon needed for films after On Her Majesty’s Secret Service et cetera. However, the big mistake was filming You Only Live Twice first. That [cuss]ed up the next film after On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.
Anyway, I still stand firmly that Dalton would be good in a remake of The Man with the Golden Gun or possibly You Only Live Twice. I've got a (I think) super idea for Moonraker, so that's my main reason for wanting it to be remade. (Basically exchange ICBM for 'space shuttle' in the book's plot and add in the PTS, centrifuge, toxic gas...and you have a better film.) Pity Moore was so good in that one.
#13
Posted 25 May 2002 - 08:45 PM
I would be the first to see it....I'd pay anything!!!!!!!
#14
Posted 23 May 2002 - 12:30 PM
#15
Posted 26 May 2002 - 02:19 AM
ray t (24 May, 2002 04:34 p.m.):
Oh...and TSWLM was TOTTALY FAITHFUL to the novel? Right?
Eon had no choice, Fleming was embarrased by the reviews of The Spy Who Loved Me. Anyway the novelisation read pretty much like a Fleming.
sorry. you were referring to "GOOD" novels.
Whoa! Let's not go to far! The Spy Who Loved Me is a fantastically well-written book. I don't like the first-person, and it's rather short (it'd make a good PTS), but it's not the 'brutal, sadistic, digusting book' critics would make us think.
#16
Posted 19 July 2002 - 03:13 AM
#17
Posted 19 July 2002 - 07:44 AM
#18
Posted 22 July 2002 - 09:10 PM
#19
Posted 22 July 2002 - 09:42 PM
#20
Posted 22 July 2002 - 09:56 PM
Originally posted by PaulZ108
Dalton was a great Bond and I wouldn't have minded seeing him in GoldenEye (why do I feel like I shouldn't have said that...), but I think it's a little late now for him to come back.
I'm repeating myself but I really wouldn't mind at all if Datlon were still Bond and he were the one ushering in the twentieth movie, or at least that rumored "third Dalton movie", maybe explaining just how he got back into the Service after giving M his resignation and knocking down a few other agents in the process in LTK.
#21
Posted 22 July 2002 - 10:53 PM
BESIDES when asked if he wanted to return as Bond in '94 he refused and so they then went to Brosnan, who's contract with Remington Steel had ended, I believe.
#22
Posted 22 July 2002 - 11:21 PM
Every time I watch The Living Daylights and Licence to Kill.
And that's as far as it will ever go with Tim playing Bond.
#23
Posted 23 July 2002 - 06:50 PM
The people who make Bond somehow make the top execs at MGM really mad and they begin to resent Bond and want nothing to do with it anymore. A decision is suddenly made out of the blue that despite hid success as Bond, Pierce Brosnan will not be asked back. In order to do what no one else has come to close to doing besides that one man, they make the decision to kill James Bond. In a scenario similar to that which the play The Producers was about, they purposely make a movie to kill a franchise. Getting Dalton back would enable him to finish the job he started in the 80s, castrating and then finally killing James Bond. Yeah, that would do it, all right.
#24
Posted 24 July 2002 - 10:04 PM
Although i'd have killed (and would still like to see a 3rd Dalton Bond) to see Tim back in the Tux. That's not gonna happen.
BLOFELD'S CAT said it best. He'll live on as Bond through his contribution to the series.
#25
Posted 06 August 2002 - 02:50 PM
#26
Posted 06 August 2002 - 04:30 PM
#27
Posted 06 August 2002 - 07:47 PM
#28
Posted 06 August 2002 - 10:01 PM
Sean returned in NSNA.
George was an unidentified tuxedoed secret agent in The Return Of The Man From UNCLE.
There are also talks of Roger playing a secret agent playing Campion Bond.
Although it may be living in the past for them, I don't see why Dalton cannot make that sort of return.
#29
Posted 08 August 2002 - 01:08 PM
If Dalton cannot be Bond again, he should
make a movie like "Entrapment". I actually think
Entrapment was partly based on the proposed third
Dalton film. There were many similarities.
And Zeta Jones would have been excellent as Connie Webb. Almost
the same role in a way.
#30
Posted 08 August 2002 - 01:59 PM
Yeah. You'd never catch me doing that! [/QUOTE00]
We'll let the evidence on the boards speak for themselves.