
Bond's age
#1
Posted 05 May 2002 - 03:56 AM
How old is James Bond? Yes, I know Pierce Brosnan is 48, but George Lazenby was 29 when he played James Bond. And when Roger Moore departed, Bond went from late-fifties to mid-forties overnight. I recall hearing somewhere that Fleming's original requirements for 00's included mandatory retirement at age 40. The 00's must be in prime physical condition after all. Anyone know if that's true?
#2
Posted 07 May 2002 - 02:01 AM
#3
Posted 07 May 2002 - 02:35 AM
General Koskov (07 May, 2002 03:01 a.m.):
Yeah, but on the plus side, George Lazenby would have done a hell of a lot more films!
Please, no need to give me nightmares, once was more than enough ;-) Putting aside matters of like and dislike of Mr Lazenby he'd have been ousted after TMWTGG for a younger model. Followed by Dalton for TSWLM- FYEO then Pierce from Octopussy - LTK (lucky Pierce, he gets AVTAK and LTK, EEK!) And then the dark years with Hugh Grant in Property Of A Lady, GE & TND then a 15 year gap to get over that... and Daniel Radcliff in 2013 in TWINE!
MBE
#4
Posted 07 May 2002 - 02:39 AM
#5
Posted 07 May 2002 - 01:15 AM
Wasn't Sean older than that?
#6
Posted 07 May 2002 - 03:34 AM
#7
Posted 07 May 2002 - 04:46 AM
Turn (07 May, 2002 04:34 a.m.):
So, does this mean since I'm 35 I can be Bond? 8)
Only if you start the role immeadiately. The second you turn 36 you're out!
It's like Logan's Run but at 35 instead of 30. ;-)
MBE
#8
Posted 08 May 2002 - 04:30 AM
#9
Posted 08 May 2002 - 10:35 PM
#10
Posted 08 May 2002 - 10:45 PM

#11
Posted 05 May 2002 - 06:08 PM
davidfries (05 May, 2002 04:56 a.m.):
Ok General Koskov, you talked me into it.
D'oh! A Pandora's Box has been opened. ;D
#12
Posted 05 May 2002 - 06:20 PM
James Bond 007 is a Time Lord, and I can prove it!
http://www.btinterne...ber.6/Bond.html
MBE
#13
Posted 07 May 2002 - 01:47 AM
FallinAngel17 (07 May, 2002 12:55 a.m.):
I wish Pierce was younger, he could play Bond for a lot longer, and besides Sean Connery he's the best bond. I think Bond should be between the ages of 25 ad 35.
Well according to that age parameter, Brosnan would never have been Bond, ditto Dalton or Moore and Connery would have made only 4 films. The idea of a 25 yr old Bond makes me kind of queasy.
MBE
#14
Posted 01 June 2002 - 10:35 PM
#15
Posted 01 June 2002 - 10:44 PM
Double-Oh-Zero (08 May, 2002 11:35 p.m.):
His lungs and liver must be in sad shape by now...
In Thunderball the Medical Officer gives a report on his health that says '[Bond's] liver is not palpable'. So perhaps half a bottle of liquor a day isn't that bad...
#16
Posted 05 May 2002 - 06:29 PM

Well, I suppose that's what one can expect after fifty years of James Bond!
#17
Posted 05 May 2002 - 03:45 PM
The film Bond's generally have the same years of birth as the actor portraying them.
In answer to the question, who knows?
#18
Posted 05 May 2002 - 06:07 PM
I think we are to assume the radiation in Dr No's island made Bond unable to age!

As for the books, I could have seen Bond retiring a few books after The Man with the Golden Gun.
#19
Posted 06 May 2002 - 05:04 AM
#20
Posted 06 May 2002 - 11:55 PM