What I meant by the comment was that James Bond is a thriller character, and that many writers (usually of the female persuasion) have a slight habit of moving him into a more romantic situation (and yes you have thriller parts of your story too). I was trying to illustrate a point that often Bond is moved into situations where he seems slightly out of place.
I didn't mean to cause offense and I apologise if I did so.
I admit the Bond in my fan fiction is distant in his own waay from Fleming, probably in more dramatic ways then being a romanticised character. My Bond brushes his teeth, listens to Frank Sinatra and contemplates suicide over a whirlwind affair- by no means is he Fleming's Bond. So why my statement may have been misinterpreted (or more then likely poorly worded) it was more an observation.
I think we all- to some degree change Bond to fit our own narrative needs. And to be perfectly honest I don't think it is a bad thing.
Edited by Robert Watts, 19 April 2006 - 03:22 AM.