We all know Connery wore a hair piece, but does Roger also wear one
I had an arguement with a friend of mine that he did wear a wig, just look at the two tone colours of his hair in the films it got blonder and blonder in AVTAK, plus the fact that it never moved.
Any ideas or opinions wig or no wig?

Bond's rugs
Started by
OVERLORD
, Mar 26 2006 02:29 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 26 March 2006 - 02:29 PM
#2
Posted 26 March 2006 - 02:49 PM
No wig for Roger.
#3
Posted 26 March 2006 - 02:51 PM
Hairspray. Lots of it = no hair movement.
#4
Posted 26 March 2006 - 03:31 PM
No wig indeed. I'm wondering where this rumour is coming from ? Even now at 78 old, Roger Moore doesn't need one ...
#5
Posted 26 March 2006 - 04:00 PM
If he wasn't wearing a hairpiece in his later Bond films, his hairdresser on the films should have been fired for making him LOOK like he was wearing a hairpiece IMO. (And people make fun of Dalton's hair!)

#6
Posted 27 March 2006 - 07:58 PM
His hair in Octopussy and A View To A Kill, was like a mop. He would have looked more Bondish if he had it shorter like he did in MR and FYEO
#7
Posted 28 March 2006 - 10:52 PM
Maybe, but he did never wear any hair piece and even not now

#8
Posted 29 March 2006 - 12:18 AM
Personally, I think both Moore and Dalton have great hair ... their "bad hair" in certain films is the fault of the hairdressers, not the actors.
And no, no hairpiece for Sir Moore.
And no, no hairpiece for Sir Moore.
#9
Posted 29 March 2006 - 12:23 AM
True
