Goldeneye 007
#1
Posted 18 February 2006 - 07:44 AM
Also, in many Bond games, there was a secondary option with the weapons. THAT is something I'd have really enjoyed in Goldeneye. Because there were sometimes that I didn't want a silencer on my Pp7 when I had one, and vice versa. Also, the KF7 Soviet looked like a dang pencil.
But there were so many other things that would make this game the S-word, if you know what I mean.
Anyone have any other ideas?
Taking guards hostage would be nice.... and punching instead of slapping.
The multiplayer couldn't have been better. Except the part about if you strafe while you're unarmed, you'll hold your arm out like you've got a gun anyway....
Oh, and did I mention The Citadel?
#2
Posted 18 February 2006 - 08:12 AM
I think we're done with GoldenEye. Seriously.
#3
Posted 16 March 2006 - 10:22 PM
#4
Posted 17 March 2006 - 03:21 AM
#5
Posted 20 March 2006 - 07:35 AM
Edited by kapayton1, 20 March 2006 - 07:36 AM.
#6
Posted 26 March 2006 - 09:49 AM
A remake would be cool, but I doubt it will happen.
www.goldeneyesource.com .
Multiplayer only at the moment (and only in Alpha) but very cool.
Edited by Fro, 26 March 2006 - 09:50 AM.
#7
Posted 27 March 2006 - 09:39 PM
#8
Posted 27 March 2006 - 09:57 PM
If I may ask, what is everybody's deal with GRA? Nearly everyone that ever posts here blasts it just because "ooh, they kill off James Bond." What is the big deal? Please, no one take offense,I am just curious. Personally, it and Agent Under Fire are my two favorite newer 007 games
[mra]I blast it because I wanted a James Bond game. And they give me this
#9
Posted 28 March 2006 - 04:18 AM
#11
Posted 28 March 2006 - 06:56 PM
#12
Posted 29 March 2006 - 12:34 AM
#13
Posted 29 March 2006 - 06:09 AM
#14
Posted 29 March 2006 - 06:48 AM
#15
Posted 29 March 2006 - 12:32 PM
Thats the reason why it shouldnt be redone with them. If Rare had the chance to remake it then it prob would of been one the best games ever made.Perhaps because of the general disappointment to GoldenEye: Rogue Agent?
#16
Posted 29 March 2006 - 12:59 PM
Maybe. I'm just not so sure now, because Eon & Co. would most likely take a much more active role with its development (as they did with the other games when GoldenEye 64 seemed nothing more than Bond running around with a gun).Thats the reason why it shouldnt be redone with them. If Rare had the chance to remake it then it prob would of been one the best games ever made.
Perhaps because of the general disappointment to GoldenEye: Rogue Agent?
#17
Posted 29 March 2006 - 10:40 PM
In Goldeneye Bond used a tank.Maybe. I'm just not so sure now, because Eon & Co. would most likely take a much more active role with its development (as they did with the other games when GoldenEye 64 seemed nothing more than Bond running around with a gun).
Thats the reason why it shouldnt be redone with them. If Rare had the chance to remake it then it prob would of been one the best games ever made.
Perhaps because of the general disappointment to GoldenEye: Rogue Agent?
#18
Posted 02 April 2006 - 02:40 AM
but....i have conquered all levels of difficulty except I cant pass the darn egyptian level.....grrr....i defeat baron simide(sp sry) but i cant get the golden gun...anybody know how?
#19
Posted 02 April 2006 - 08:05 PM
#20
Posted 02 April 2006 - 09:28 PM
lol sorry about the mispelling Samedi, Baron. Lol thanks again
#21
Posted 03 April 2006 - 02:08 AM
I'm With you there, "If" Rare makes GoldenEye007, it will be for Microsoft, in final terms, just Xbox? I don't think so. Every Consle or nothing at all, or better, yet, leave it alone!Also, concerning Rare remaking Goldeneye, I don't think Rare should be allowed to remake any of their library exclusively for Microsoft. That was one of my main gripes concerning the new Perfect Dark. Then again, thats just me.
#22
Posted 03 April 2006 - 05:43 AM
#23
Posted 07 April 2006 - 11:14 PM
#24
Posted 19 April 2006 - 06:35 PM