Press Outcry Against Casino Royale Plot Elements
#1
Posted 14 February 2006 - 05:25 PM
http://news.scotsman...fm?id=232552006
#2
Posted 14 February 2006 - 05:30 PM
#3
Posted 14 February 2006 - 05:33 PM
Sounds like they're going for whatever publicity they can...
#4
Posted 14 February 2006 - 05:41 PM
The bad part is Bond being caught killing - it's not that the person was innocent.
#5
Posted 14 February 2006 - 05:44 PM
#6
Posted 14 February 2006 - 08:03 PM
#7
Posted 14 February 2006 - 08:10 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2006 - 08:10 PM
I don't recall seeing this in the script report... The geezer in question was not specified as being innocent (nor a 'fake' suicide bomber...).
Sounds like they're going for whatever publicity they can...
And given what they've been through - the illegal murder of their loved one by Blair's fascist regime - they have my full support in so doing.
However, in this case they do seem to have been misled by the customary -stirring of the British tabloids.
#9
Posted 15 February 2006 - 12:35 AM
#10
Posted 15 February 2006 - 12:39 AM
#11
Posted 15 February 2006 - 12:45 AM
Yet another piece of bad press for Bond. As someone pointed out on another forum, the general buzz around CR is not good.
I doubt anyone really cares about this.
#12
Posted 15 February 2006 - 01:15 AM
#13
Posted 15 February 2006 - 01:39 AM
#14
Posted 15 February 2006 - 02:23 AM
http://news.scotsman...fm?id=235592006
In a statement [Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson] said: "We categorically deny reports that the script of Casino Royale bears any resemblance to the tragic death of the innocent Brazilian citizen Mr Jean Charles de Menezes.
"In the script of Casino Royale James Bond does not kill any innocent people."
#15
Posted 15 February 2006 - 02:47 AM
Yet another piece of bad press for Bond. As someone pointed out on another forum, the general buzz around CR is not good.
Have to disagree - this news "story" is so pointless, I doubt anyone really cares all that much about it.
#16
Posted 15 February 2006 - 02:53 AM
Yet another piece of bad press for Bond. As someone pointed out on another forum, the general buzz around CR is not good.
Have to disagree - this news "story" is so pointless, I doubt anyone really cares all that much about it.
I'd would say that's wrong - kinda. As we all know the Bond producers rarely if ever break their silence and discuss speculation or whatever. Apparently this was big enough for them to actually make a statement. So.. from a certain point of view....
#17
Posted 15 February 2006 - 05:17 AM
I don't recall seeing this in the script report... The geezer in question was not specified as being innocent (nor a 'fake' suicide bomber...).
Sounds like they're going for whatever publicity they can...
And given what they've been through - the illegal murder of their loved one by Blair's fascist regime - they have my full support in so doing.
However, in this case they do seem to have been misled by the customary -stirring of the British tabloids.
Because of course it never happens in Brazil that police open fire erroneously. Puta madre!
#18
Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:31 AM
#19
Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:31 AM
#20
Posted 15 February 2006 - 03:12 PM
But I'm just thinking out loud here.
#21
Posted 15 February 2006 - 03:19 PM
This sounds all wrong. Damm the press. The article says the storyline will involve Bond shooting an "unarmed" bombing suspect who is the "wrong" guy and Bond has to clear his name. That's not what has been said in the script review unless since then Mr. Haggis decided to throw out the original story from CR and have turn in to a film about Bond killing an unarmed man and finds himself trying to clear his name a-la The Fugitive. I do feel for what happened to the fellow and his family but someone got it wrong. The media saw a chance to profit from a tragedy not CR. If anything the scene the way its described in the script review shows how bad the press is when they brodcast Bond shooting a villain all the place compromising Bonds mission. Vultures the lot of them and rubbish I say. Like Bond said "They'll print anything these days".
As a member of the press I resent your comments. Don't bunch all of us in the media industry in with the tabloids. Do I believe that all Germans are Nazi's because Adolf Hitler was one - of course not.
Likewise most of us in the newspaper industry practice responsible journalism, but there are a few who go for the most sensationalist elements.
#22
Posted 15 February 2006 - 03:32 PM
And given what they've been through - the illegal murder of their loved one by Blair's fascist regime - they have my full support in so doing.
I think you need to read up a little more on fascism before you start claiming Blair's government is fascist.
#23
Posted 15 February 2006 - 03:39 PM
And given what they've been through - the illegal murder of their loved one by Blair's fascist regime - they have my full support in so doing.
I think you need to read up a little more on fascism before you start claiming Blair's government is fascist.
Exactly. This extreme bomb throwing language helps no one.
#24
Posted 15 February 2006 - 03:51 PM
Tell that to Lee Tamahori.All publicity is good publicity...