who give a toss about the super bowl?
#1
Posted 06 February 2006 - 01:28 AM
#2
Posted 06 February 2006 - 01:40 AM
#3
Posted 06 February 2006 - 01:46 AM
I'm sure no-one in the US cares about the fact that Souness is out, or that the Six Nations have started or that the British economy is strangely skewed at the moment.
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
#4
Posted 06 February 2006 - 01:52 AM
Salient point, so I moved it.
I'm sure no-one in the US cares about the fact that Souness is out, or that the Six Nations have started or that the British economy is strangely skewed at the moment.
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Ha! Your small rugby guys would get crushed in the NFL.
#5
Posted 06 February 2006 - 01:56 AM
Go Steelers, though!
#6
Posted 06 February 2006 - 03:49 AM
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Not that football players or their fans need defending, but that argument always strikes me as lame.
Were Medieval knights pansies because they wore body armour and helmets? Was jousting "for pansies" because the participants wore armour and helmets?
#7
Posted 06 February 2006 - 03:57 AM
#8
Posted 06 February 2006 - 04:04 AM
I understand that you could care less about the Super Bowl, james st.john smythe, but there's no real reason to complain about it when it doesn't not even involve your country. I'm not trying to be a dick here, but your complaining is utterly pointless.souness is out. whats newcastles chances? i say the F.A cup
#9
Posted 06 February 2006 - 04:13 AM
#10
Posted 06 February 2006 - 07:03 AM
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Not that football players or their fans need defending, but that argument always strikes me as lame.
Were Medieval knights pansies because they wore body armour and helmets?
Whilst that's a very good point, did they have to stop fighting every thirty seconds to have a five minute break?
#11
Posted 06 February 2006 - 08:04 AM
Enough said.
Word.
#12
Posted 06 February 2006 - 09:16 AM
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Not that football players or their fans need defending, but that argument always strikes me as lame.
Were Medieval knights pansies because they wore body armour and helmets?
Whilst that's a very good point, did they have to stop fighting every thirty seconds to have a five minute break?
Well said, and our lads don't prance around in satin longjohns. Grr. Mud.
#13
Posted 06 February 2006 - 10:15 AM
Relegation? With Roeder in charge, that's a big possibility. I'd rather think about West Ham's chances- Europe maybe?souness is out. whats newcastles chances? i say the F.A cup
#14
Posted 06 February 2006 - 10:18 AM
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Not that football players or their fans need defending, but that argument always strikes me as lame.
Were Medieval knights pansies because they wore body armour and helmets?
Whilst that's a very good point, did they have to stop fighting every thirty seconds to have a five minute break?
Well said, and our lads don't prance around in satin longjohns.
Arguably a disappointment.
#15
Posted 06 February 2006 - 11:49 AM
thats the spirit my son!Relegation? With Roeder in charge, that's a big possibility. I'd rather think about West Ham's chances- Europe maybe?
souness is out. whats newcastles chances? i say the F.A cup
#16
Posted 06 February 2006 - 12:20 PM
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Not that football players or their fans need defending, but that argument always strikes me as lame.
Were Medieval knights pansies because they wore body armour and helmets?
Whilst that's a very good point, did they have to stop fighting every thirty seconds to have a five minute break?
Well said, and our lads don't prance around in satin longjohns. Grr. Mud.
Well your little lads play pretty well for such small guys--scrappy little buggers.
#17
Posted 06 February 2006 - 01:46 PM
#18
Posted 06 February 2006 - 04:55 PM
American Football is for pansies anyway, it's basically boring Rugby with body armour and helmets.
Not that football players or their fans need defending, but that argument always strikes me as lame.
Were Medieval knights pansies because they wore body armour and helmets?
Whilst that's a very good point, did they have to stop fighting every thirty seconds to have a five minute break?
Well said, and our lads don't prance around in satin longjohns. Grr. Mud.
American Football is a much rougher game than rugby. They didn't used to wear "body armor" as you call it, but then there was a season where a number of the players were killed and the padding was introduced to prevent further fatalities.
How many rugby players are killed every year?!
#19
Posted 06 February 2006 - 05:23 PM
#20
Posted 06 February 2006 - 05:33 PM
who give a toss about the super bowl?, not me!!!!!!
souness is out. whats newcastles chances? i say the F.A cup
[mra]If no toss is given by you, why
#21
Posted 06 February 2006 - 05:36 PM
#22
Posted 06 February 2006 - 05:39 PM
#23
Posted 06 February 2006 - 05:45 PM
The high level of this conversation is amazing.
Well, it's been very enlightening for me. Today, after all these years I realize it was my pansi-ness that was responsible for the separated shoulders, torn cartilage, and herniated disks I suffered in high school, and not the 260 pound linemen I faced each game.
It seems that if I hadn't been wearing those stupid pads, I might've come out better off. Although, the fact that the football helmet is one of the more dangerous weapons around might negate that notion.
#24
Posted 07 February 2006 - 02:36 AM
How many rugby players are killed every year?!
And they are just the one that don't make it through training!17.
#25
Posted 07 February 2006 - 03:33 PM
How many rugby players are killed every year?!And they are just the one that don't make it through training!17.
Without pads you'd have almost the whole NFL crippled or dead in a few years--the size, speed and intensity of impact is unparalled in sports.
#26
Posted 07 February 2006 - 03:36 PM
How many rugby players are killed every year?!And they are just the one that don't make it through training!17.
Without pads you'd have almost the whole NFL crippled or dead in a few years--the size, speed and intensity of impact is unparalled in sports.
I've no issue with that - it does look jolly rough - but I'm still mystified why the game has to keep stopping (although I suspect it's because it is so rough).
I fully appreciate that in Cricket, we have a game that can last five days and involve a lot of tea and cake, but this stop-start is always something that's prevented me enjoying American Football (as it's known around these parts).
#27
Posted 07 February 2006 - 04:03 PM
How many rugby players are killed every year?!And they are just the one that don't make it through training!17.
Without pads you'd have almost the whole NFL crippled or dead in a few years--the size, speed and intensity of impact is unparalled in sports.
I've no issue with that - it does look jolly rough - but I'm still mystified why the game has to keep stopping (although I suspect it's because it is so rough).
I fully appreciate that in Cricket, we have a game that can last five days and involve a lot of tea and cake, but this stop-start is always something that's prevented me enjoying American Football (as it's known around these parts).
I guess it's part the roughness, part intensity, part set-up, part strategy and part TV commercials. I suppose also because it is so regimented time-wise--being exactly 60 minutes of play with the clock ticking down every second of play. So in between the ticking of the clock and of play there are the timeouts for strategy, for setting up the next play and commercials. It is hard looking at it from the outside--I for one would have a hard time getting all of Rugby and especially Cricket.
#28
Posted 07 February 2006 - 04:18 PM
I've no issue with that - it does look jolly rough - but I'm still mystified why the game has to keep stopping (although I suspect it's because it is so rough).
I fully appreciate that in Cricket, we have a game that can last five days and involve a lot of tea and cake, but this stop-start is always something that's prevented me enjoying American Football (as it's known around these parts).
I guess it's part the roughness, part intensity, part set-up, part strategy and part TV commercials. I suppose also because it is so regimented time-wise--being exactly 60 minutes of play with the clock ticking down every second of play. So in between the ticking of the clock and of play there are the timeouts for strategy, for setting up the next play and commercials. It is hard looking at it from the outside--I for one would have a hard time getting all of Rugby and especially Cricket.
I've never known that - seriously. I'm beginning to see the point. Thanks.
#29
Posted 07 February 2006 - 05:36 PM
#30
Posted 08 February 2006 - 03:46 AM