Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Brosnan's 007


35 replies to this topic

#31 Tinfinger

Tinfinger

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts

Posted 13 February 2006 - 06:19 AM

Whatever {rolls eyes}

#32 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 13 February 2006 - 06:41 AM

Whatever {rolls eyes}

You said you had no clue as to why it was hated. I explained exactly why some find it detestable.

#33 Tinfinger

Tinfinger

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts

Posted 13 February 2006 - 07:27 AM

Yep, and I rolled my eyes at your reasoning. Case closed.

#34 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 13 February 2006 - 07:33 AM

Yep, and I rolled my eyes at your reasoning. Case closed.

What was "eye roll" worthy about my reasoning? There's no reason to be so condescending. After all, it's all opinion. Self-important things irk me. A lot. And TWINE is about as self-important as it gets, and for all its effort, it still mananges to be slow and uninteresting.

If you must know the whole host of things I find wrong with TWINE, I'd be more than than happy to tell you, but I was only listing the primary reason - and that is that it got who Bond is all wrong. And I do give a lot of leeway there - I like most of the Bond interpretations and am looking forward to Craig's reinvention. But when you take a male fantasy figure who is supposed to be hard and removed and throw in a lot of sensitivity and melodrama (Bond even stops a tear on a computer screen in TWINE), you're moving the character in a direction I won't stand for.

#35 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 13 February 2006 - 09:46 PM


Yep, and I rolled my eyes at your reasoning. Case closed.

What was "eye roll" worthy about my reasoning? There's no reason to be so condescending. After all, it's all opinion. Self-important things irk me. A lot. And TWINE is about as self-important as it gets, and for all its effort, it still mananges to be slow and uninteresting.

If you must know the whole host of things I find wrong with TWINE, I'd be more than than happy to tell you, but I was only listing the primary reason - and that is that it got who Bond is all wrong. And I do give a lot of leeway there - I like most of the Bond interpretations and am looking forward to Craigs reinvention. But when you take a male fantasy figure who is supposed to be hard and removed and throw in a lot of sensitivity and melodrama (Bond even stops a tear on a computer screen in TWINE), you're moving the character in a direction I won't stand for.



I'm with you Harmsway. In fact if this poster wants to know the reasons why people dislike this movie he can research it in the Pierce Brosnan forum, there is more than one thread on the subject there.

#36 Judo chop

Judo chop

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7461 posts
  • Location:the bottle to the belly!

Posted 13 February 2006 - 10:15 PM

My ranking of the Pierce films:

1. GE
2. DAD
3. TND
4. TWINE

My ranking in terms of what I thought of PB's performances:

1. TWINE
2. GE
3. DAD
4. TND

Though, truth be told, I don't see THAT much difference in his performances. I can find moments in each film where I think he's right on, and moments where I think he's trying too hard to be Connery/Dalton or where his mannerisms just irk me. (Breathing through his nose in every make-out scene! I can't stand it!)

Ranking his films is easy for me though. GE wins by a mile; fun and wholly unoffensive. TWINE loses by a mile; dull and lifeless. TND and DAD are generally both equally entertaining and yet long-winded in action at the end. DAD wins out because of a small handful of inspired moments that TND just did not have.