
Does anyone here actually like A View To A Kill?
#61
Posted 09 March 2006 - 06:54 PM
Christopher Walken is Bloody brilliant in everything he does
when i first saw this i wanted Bond to die. Zorin had to win
#62
Posted 09 March 2006 - 07:20 PM
#63
Posted 10 March 2006 - 11:41 PM
Roger was most certainly unfunny. Which wouldn't be a problem, as evidenced by Dalton, except that he tried. And damn hard. Only to fail most of the time.the film would have been a bore if dalton was in it. then again that is a good thing because no one would need to use sleeping pills. and roger unfunny? now that's a joke.
"Funny" Bond? Give me Connery any day of the week. Hell, Lazenby and Brosnan could be pretty humorous too.
"Quiche" and "style" don't belong in the same sentence.also whats worng with quiche a touch of style goes along way.
Although admittedly, it's better than if he had been baking pies and brownies for neighborhood children. Even if that would have been the most "realistic" thing Rog could have done with Bond at that stage in his life.
Right, so we should scour the nursing homes for the next great untapped talent during the search for Bond #7.and old is gold.
Seriously, there's such a thing as being too old for Bond (Roger in the 80s) as there is being too young (Cavill nowadays). The character should have the appearance of being in his thirties or forties.
Aside from three or four cheesy moments of romantic "tenderness" in TLD, Dalton's performance hardly qualified as warranting hankies. I'd say that was Brosnan's department more often than not.roger can certainly teach a thing or two to mr bard dalton about playing bond and not wetting your hankies every second. when you look at dalton you get that feeling that he wants his mother to hold his hand.
Hell, not only was Moore's "sweetness" a big part of his claim to fame, he even tried to be emotionally "deep" and "sensitive" on a number of ocassions (FYEO, OP, and of course the quiche nonsense in AVTAK). Then there's Lazenby at the end of OHMSS, for that matter. Truth be told, only Connery was unabashedly detached in that sense.
Again, it's a Bond film, not something out of Disney (or Pixar, in DAD's case). Rampant silliness of a certain caliber doesn't belong. Just like being too "gritty" or "realistic." And while wannabe cartoons like MR are out of whack on one extreme of the scale, AVTAK is perhaps even worse because it has no idea what it wants to be: serious movie with a bunch of people being senselessly offed, or lighthearted fun-for-all-the-family comedy fare.and there's nothing wrong with a ride on a fire engine to keep you excited. its a bond film, not a documentary.
#64
Posted 13 March 2006 - 10:34 AM
goldfinger-realistic?
thunderball realistic?
thunderballrealistic?
these are the questions you have to ask your self. most bond films, even dr no, had some silliness to them.
Right, so we should scour the nursing homes for the next great untapped talent during the search for Bond #7.
of course, lets try that. i am sure the old men would have more style than this new bond fella.
Edited by rashid12, 13 March 2006 - 12:01 PM.
#65
Posted 19 March 2006 - 09:33 PM
#66
Posted 20 March 2006 - 05:26 PM
#67
Posted 20 March 2006 - 07:32 PM
Sean Connery is who brought humor to the role of James Bond. The Bond of the books was virtually humorless, although Fleming obviously had fun writing them and it shows in the narration, and in the choice of names for secondary characters. But Connery's humor was a gallows humor. Leaving the corpse of a man in a car, and telling an embassy guard to see that he doesn't go anywhere. Shooting a man with a speargun, then saying, "I think he got the point." This did however make it seem as if killing didn't bother Bond, when in the book, he was ambivalent about violence.
#68
Posted 25 March 2006 - 04:51 AM
As Stephen Spotswood said, Connery's humor was sarcastic and morbid, and came off naturally and incredibly cool. Rog didn't have any of that. He had painfully cheesy "puns" so obvious and easy that, well...a seven-year-old could have written them.Connery funny? in which century, or more better, in which planet? roger never needed to try hard; he's natrually funny.
What? How exactly did Dalton or Moore look like they were about to break into laughter?perhaps your idea of funny is watching men wear dungarees. dalton always looked like he would crack up. is that a realistic bond? someone like that in real life would become a liability. atleast roger never acted like he would cry or crack up.
And don't even bother getting into "real life" when you're arguing in favor of Roger. Yes, he had charm, was lively, and clearly loved the role. Those were his strengths. Being "realistic" was not among them. That was Dalton's domain more than any other Bond. He was believable as a spy, Moore undoubtedly was not.
And for the last time, the only Bond one could argue did not have "sensitive" moments in his movies was Sir Sean. The rest saw "emotional" scenes every so often, some justifiably so (Lazenby), others not so much (to be perfectly honest, the rest most of the time).
Right, I bet baking delicious pastries is part of every secret agent's survival guide.everything was taken with a pinch of salt. matter of fact his humor was a form of detachment. baking food isn't something only for feminine men. it just comes to show that roger's bond is more resourceful. hey, maybe he could bake poor, cryboy dalton a pie, or a quiche. and quiche is style. but how would you know that? you like tinothy dalton.
And between your poor spelling and grade-school insults, I'm surprised you'd even bother touting the merits of cinematic "style" in this discussion.
Of course, and definitely Dr. No (which has whiffs of YOLT, if you ask me), but I still don't like it being an element of the Bond movies. I prefer a healthy balance of realism and fantasy, which for me lies closer to the former's side of the spectrum.goldfinger-realistic?
thunderball realistic?
thunderballrealistic?
these are the questions you have to ask your self. most bond films, even dr no, had some silliness to them.
Thunderball, though "epic" in most ways, is not that unrealistic. Goldfinger more so, but still plausible enough to fall within my preferred range, which is more than I can say for the likes of, say, Moonraker or DAD.
Because you've seen him as Bond in...Right, so we should scour the nursing homes for the next great untapped talent during the search for Bond #7.
of course, lets try that. i am sure the old men would have more style than this new bond fella.
#69
Posted 26 March 2006 - 04:20 PM
also whats worng with quiche a touch of style goes along way.
Pardon, but what is your experience with cuisine or cooking? I've never heard anyone ever refer to quiche as "style." The quiche bit itself was intended as a joke (the popular book at the time "Real Men Don't Eat Quiche").
At that point in the film on opening night, some audience members laughed while others groaned. Old school Bond fans in the audience asked "Why didn't he just cook up some scrambled eggs? It's Bond's favorite dish in the Fleming novels!"
As for your comments on Dalton, at what points of TLD and LTK are they based on?
#70
Posted 26 March 2006 - 04:30 PM
WHAT HUMOUR? in which planet?
You don't actually think it was Sir Roger Moore who first brought humor to the Bond film formula do you?
Connery credits Young with the initial idea of bringing humor (which didn't exist in Fleming's novels) to the first Bond films. Over time, Bond's one-liners became cemented into the franchise.
Some classics:
"Shocking, positively shocking."
"She's just dead!"
"He got the point."
Connery laid the groundwork that Moore followed.
Sir Sean Connery once said with his Bond, he let the audience in on the joke ... while Moore let the audience know that a joke was coming.
Edited by krypt, 26 March 2006 - 11:44 PM.
#71
Posted 26 March 2006 - 07:46 PM
#72
Posted 06 April 2006 - 08:33 PM
Cool stuff:
-Christopher Walken and Grace Jones (excellent villains and younger than their predecessors-interesting contrast to Roger Moore who is a veteran)
-Pretitles sequence (even Calafornia Girls which is fun without being silly)
-Scenes in mine & fight on Golden Gate Bridge.
-Godfrey Tibbet
-That Russian bloke getting chucked into the propeller on the oil rig
-Soundtrack (one of John Barry's finest)
-San Francisco
-Tanya Roberts (not for her acting but shes undeniably one of the sexiest women in any Bond film
-Roger Moore looks too old but giving up when he should have would have been sissy. He's out to prove he can still play the part and succeeds
#73
Posted 07 April 2006 - 10:26 PM
#74
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:27 PM
Oh yes, quiche usually makes me ill.
Edited by Stephen Spotswood, 10 April 2006 - 09:02 PM.
#75
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:49 PM
#76
Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:12 PM
#77
Posted 12 April 2006 - 03:17 PM
Is that like a sorbet, or a "Soprano's" way of saying superb?
#78
Posted 13 April 2006 - 08:59 PM
#79
Posted 22 April 2006 - 03:17 AM

Edited by Piz Gloria 1969, 22 April 2006 - 03:21 AM.
#80
Posted 24 April 2006 - 08:58 PM
* Grace Jones - But why did she have to become a good guy all of the sudden? It was a very lame and bad move by the screenwriter. It would have been better if Bond faught with her to the death.
*Roger Moore and Patrick Macnee's scenes together are very good.
BUT THE MOVIE FALLS BECAUSE
* Weak Plot - Why bother with Max Zorin draining Silicon Valley? It would have been more threatfull with giving him a more sinister plan. Killing every first born perhaps

* Tanya Roberts - No she is NOT underrated she is even worse than Britt Ekland.
* Christopher Walken- Walken is a good actor but his attempt to imitate David Bowie (who was considered for the role and it's obvious it was written with his personality in mind and therefore he would have made a better villan) doesn't feel right. He's a little stiff and boring...and again his plot doesn't feel sinister so not even the DNA-stories or his killing of henchmen make him seem evil and threatening. He's like a parody of a Bond-villan taken seriously.
#81
Posted 27 April 2006 - 09:57 PM
Edited by MrMoneypenny, 27 April 2006 - 10:01 PM.
#82
Posted 28 April 2006 - 08:09 PM
With that said there are moments that I do like - fight on the Eiffel tower and Moore stealing the Taxi cab and destroying it - the final fight on the Golden Gate I sorta like - um, I'm sure I can think of more...

#83
Posted 02 May 2006 - 02:38 PM
As far as Walken goes, he's my favorite villian if for no other reason than he's a great, entertaining freak.
I also think it has one of the best sexual quips in the series: "I got off eventually."