GQ Men: Daniel Craig .vs. Pierce Brosnan
#1
Posted 27 September 2005 - 01:43 AM
PB_GQ05_2.jpg 159.81KB 718 downloads
I thought this would be a good picture to post here because we can see [almost] side-by-side Craig and Brosnan both actually looking suave, dressed up, and groomed.
Anywho... "Craig" vs "Brosnan" in this picture, thoughts? I'm still with Brosnan (thought I doubt he'll be back for Casino Royale), he's the one with the Bond looks. Craig, eh, he's alright... but he just looks like a "Steve McQueen" type and that type is just not James Bond in my eyes.
#2
Posted 27 September 2005 - 01:55 AM
Daniel Craig..........well Steve McQueen...yeah that's accurate.
#3
Posted 27 September 2005 - 01:59 AM
#4
Posted 27 September 2005 - 01:59 AM
#5
Posted 27 September 2005 - 09:28 AM
#6
Posted 27 September 2005 - 09:45 AM
#7
Posted 27 September 2005 - 09:50 AM
#9
Posted 27 September 2005 - 12:36 PM
#10
Posted 27 September 2005 - 12:40 PM
#11
Posted 27 September 2005 - 04:25 PM
Uh?
#12
Posted 27 September 2005 - 05:05 PM
http://www.cinematic...nd-rumors-sigh/
#16
Posted 27 September 2005 - 05:20 PM
#17
Posted 27 September 2005 - 07:34 PM
#18
Posted 27 September 2005 - 10:44 PM
Edited by Alex Zamudio, 28 September 2005 - 02:55 AM.
#19
Posted 28 September 2005 - 02:51 AM
#20
Posted 28 September 2005 - 03:19 AM
He really doesn't work as Bond for me...Pierce looks pretty good.
Brosnan for Bond #5/6 Tarl?
Tarl!
Snap out of it, man!
If Craig becomes Bond, my advice to you is: don't look a problem eliminator in the mouth.
*snap*,Ok I'm still not sold... Daniel Craig just doesn't do it for me as Bond;he's just uninspired. You Limies have a serious gene pool crisis on your hands! Start breeding with those Spaniards and we'll get some proper Bond choices down the road . I almost would rather give Brosnan another shot just so they get Bond #6 right in 2008/9.And Brosnan looks pretty good there...my ' ' was out of fear they might call the 'ol bastid back to work but maybe that's not such a bad idea.
#21
Posted 28 September 2005 - 03:24 AM
#23
Posted 28 September 2005 - 04:53 AM
#26
Posted 28 September 2005 - 02:53 PM
And Mumbles is no James Bond.
#27
Posted 28 September 2005 - 03:12 PM
#28
Posted 28 September 2005 - 03:52 PM
#29
Posted 28 September 2005 - 10:38 PM
Blame the shoot's wardrobe department.Hang on, is the Bros-man in jacket, jeans and smart shoes? How can one of the most 'stylish men of the year' be dressing like Jeremy Clarkson on the cover of GQ?
I feel similar. I think that Brosnan could still play the role of 007 and would love to see him back in Bond's shoes. But... all this talk of a new Bond and Casino Royale has gotten me to a point of wanted to see another actor in the role. I don't have a specific person in mind though... Craig doesn't have the proper looks to me (maybe if they died his hair black? No, not sure that would do the trick.). Anywho, they had just better pick... someone in the spirit of the past five 007 actors.Brosnan looks in excellent shape and could still play the part, but it's time for new blood...