Give Hugh Jackman the part and cut it out! it's only a matter of MONEY if people say no at first.. that is the truth!
I don't think it's as simple as that. In the long-term, Bond would be very likely to harm Jackman's career. Without it, he can make even more money. So even if you offered him a ton, would you be able to match what he'd get without Bond? I also suspect he already has more than enough money, and that doing something that he loves and will be critically acclaimed for would be more important. Do you think offering tons of cash would be enough to get Stephen King to write a Bond novel? He already has tons of cash. Same with Jackman. Why on earth would he do it? He's already a film star.
even Pierce who was VERY much into the Bond thing , including off screen, did tons of other movies while in charge of Bond.. so Jackman would be free to do the same, I don't think that's an issue. He'd make the money from his own movies and the money from Bond. Of course since doing Bond implies giving up another movie a year, the payment has to be adequate. Pierce walked out because they didn't offer him enough money, that's the truth. What instead makes me think that good actors refuse the part is that the script is REALLY lame. Dam, Hugh would be perfect as Bond. I can JUST picture every scene! lol (so ok I've got a little crush on the guy but HEY... I'm allowed to have a favourite! lol



