Re-reading (and re-thinking) Doubleshot
#1
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:10 PM
What really strikes me is how Doubleshot IS the Bond novel people knock Benson (and Gardner for that matter) for never having written. There is no feeling of a collision between the book Bond and movie Bond here. Doubleshot is pure literary Bond. There's no Q scene, no gadgets, no car chase, no car! It's just Bond alone with his PPK, a knife, and his wits. The action scenes are, by in large, balls out foot chases. I love this!
Even Hedy and Heidi, the twins, who I remember on first read I felt didn't really belong in this "dark" novel, this time I find are a real highlight of this book. They are very well characterized, sexy and intriguing. I find myself looking forward to when and where they will pop up next.
As I said, when I first read this book I don't think I "got it" as clearly as I do now. I know Jim is going to next do a review of Doubleshot as part of his "Impossible Job" series, so I won't be doing one myself. But if I did, I think my take would be this is Benson unfettered by the films; his pure expression of the literary Bond. The result is one of the best expressions of the literary Bond in a continuation novel, period.
#2
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:35 PM
All the same I do agree with you on the other points, a very fine, serious book.
#3
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:55 PM
As I said, I'm not done yet and I do remember the very last beat of the book being somewhat film-like (more so than other Benson books), but I'll forgive that. It's Bonds reward.I'd have to argue for Heidi and Hedy being a little more movie Bond style than literary. The end almost seems like its straight out of a Purvis and Wade screenplay (*giggle giggle, you need sex, sis). For the record, I'm not complaining just saying...
All the same I do agree with you on the other points, a very fine, serious book.
#4
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:59 PM
#6
Posted 11 August 2005 - 11:39 PM
#7
Posted 11 August 2005 - 11:43 PM
I think Doubleshot is Bond at his most human in the Benson books. Once again, it is finely plotted and develops a sense of place. I think the villain is very well drawn and the novel is resonant with Fleming-esque touches.
Zencat, I totally agree. Fans of the literary Bond were served Doubleshot and then went on about Bond taking pills or being mentally unwell. Fleming set this up (YOLT, MWGG) and Benson plays with it admirably.
I particularly like the playing with structure. Bond novels can do this and should do it more often.
For everyone who is a Fleming fan, please try to read all the continuation novels. Make up your own mind. Just imagine if someone told you to only watch the Connery films. Think what you'd miss.
ACE
#8
Posted 12 August 2005 - 12:57 AM
I agree with the guy who wrote this http://commanderbond...ies/353-1.shtml
A good review by a bright fellow indeed. (Glad you reminded me of this review, ACE. I have a nifty Doubleshot icon that I've been wanting to put on some story.)
For everyone who is a Fleming fan, please try to read all the continuation novels. Make up your own mind. Just imagine if someone told you to only watch the Connery films. Think what you'd miss.
Obviously, I couldn't agree more.
#9
Posted 12 August 2005 - 01:24 AM
I must say all I have heard about Doubleshot makes me think I will like it!
You will. I echo alot of zencat's points about this book. It's one of Benson's best for certain, and the dark mood works very well for it. I particularly like the opening chapters - a good introduction to the novel. Descriptive throughout.
#10
Posted 12 August 2005 - 01:28 AM
#11
Posted 12 August 2005 - 08:12 AM
#12
Posted 12 August 2005 - 10:34 AM
Doubleshot is pure literary Bond.
Really? Cool. Too many flagrantly "movie" elements helped ruin "High Time to Kill" for me (e.g. the car chase with the flying "scout"). I'm surprised to read that "Doubleshot" is so restrained, since the premise always struck me as the kind of thing you'd get in a '60s superspy craze Bond ripoff film (good agent goes up against evil double).
I'll definitely give "Doubleshot" a chance if I get the chance. Would I be right in assuming it's Benson's "darkest" work?
#13
Posted 12 August 2005 - 02:41 PM
I'll definitely give "Doubleshot" a chance if I get the chance. Would I be right in assuming it's Benson's "darkest" work?
You've never read Doubleshot Loomis? I must have thought you did. And in my opinion from reading it a few times, yes.
#14
Posted 04 October 2005 - 03:52 AM
A local grocery store had Doubleshot and Never Dream of Dying for A DOLLAR APIECE. So I buy them, take them home...and promptly lost Doubleshot!
#15
Posted 04 October 2005 - 04:23 AM
The most appealing thing about the book for me was that James Bond wasn't mentally fit in this mission. After all he had been through in HIGH TIME TO KILL he's an injured man that suffers through this assignment.
Overall, I think this is a very fine read. I sort of get the impression that of all the Bodn novels he wrote, this is Benson's secret favorite -- or at least one he is very, very proud of. And rightly so.
#18
Posted 09 October 2005 - 05:09 AM
#19
Posted 26 October 2005 - 03:58 AM