
CR's torture scene
#1
Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:25 PM
Let's also not forget that whereas here in the US kids can see R-rated movies (which always seems a little strange to me), in the UK the 18 rating means just that.
I remember having to take ID to a showing of the 15-rated "Bervely Hills Cop 2" back in the late 1980s and watching all the people under 15 being turned away.
#4
Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:39 PM
could we see the first 18 rated 007 movie in the UK (where violence is the biggest movie taboo).
No way. Commercial suicide. I'm told that the British Board of Film Classification threatened LICENCE TO KILL with an 18, but gave it a 15 after the filmmakers agreed to cut it.
I think all the Brosnan films have been 12s. Seems you can get away with quite a lot of violence in the 12 category, judging by the fact that TERMINATOR 3 was given a 12 (although I really can't understand why - it clearly should have been a 15). Then again, MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE II is a 15, and, again, I can't for the life of me see why it's not a 12.
I hope (but don't expect) that they'll go for a 15 with CASINO ROYALE, though.
#5
Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:48 PM
#6
Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:53 PM
Curiously enough, though, you can see Bond ripping a woman's bikini top off and strangling her with it, with her bare breasts briefly visible and closeups of Bond looking like he's really getting off on what he's doing, and of the woman looking terrified and in pain.... in a film to which the BBFC gave a PG rating, DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER. Now that just beats me hollow.
#7
Posted 15 March 2005 - 05:17 PM
could we see the first 18 rated 007 movie in the UK (where violence is the biggest movie taboo).
No way. Commercial suicide. I'm told that the British Board of Film Classification threatened LICENCE TO KILL with an 18, but gave it a 15 after the filmmakers agreed to cut it.
Yes, the filmakers did agree to cut LICENSE TO KILL in the UK so that the BBFC would not slap an 18 certificate on it. You are right, an 18 would prohibit anyone under that age from going to the movie (even the 15 obviously hurt LTK) and would lead to greatly reduced box office for the picture.
#8
Posted 15 March 2005 - 05:56 PM
I mean, just look at how I turned out watching and reading 007 at such an impressionable age!

#9
Posted 15 March 2005 - 07:05 PM

#10
Posted 15 March 2005 - 07:59 PM
Curiously enough, though, you can see Bond ripping a woman's bikini top off and strangling her with it, with her bare breasts briefly visible and closeups of Bond looking like he's really getting off on what he's doing, and of the woman looking terrified and in pain.... in a film to which the BBFC gave a PG rating, DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER. Now that just beats me hollow.
At the time of the release of LICENSE TO KILL, John Glen gave interviews in which he said they had been told by the BBFC that they couldn't get away with things they had shown in the past.
#11
Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:04 PM
Go ahead and make the next 007 movie rated R or NC17...
The problem with that is that a number of US theater chains refuse to show NC-17 movies - no matter how commercial they might be. Still....the US censor doesn't seem to care about violence.
If an 18 certificate was slapped on CR, I am assuming this would effectively prevent some of CBn's UK teenage members from seeing the movie when it is released.
I remember many younger Bond fans being vocally upset that LTK got a 15-certificate because it meant they had to wait until it debuted on video to see it. (check 1989 issues of "007" magazine).
#12
Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:20 PM
Oh, and for all you Kill Bill fans: Quentin Tarantino will release Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair (1 and 2 in one film) in wide release later this year- and it's now NC-17.
#13
Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:22 PM
#14
Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:24 AM
#15
Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:58 AM
Even though you don't see anything other than the sound of the whip and Lupes expression, the UK cut ends as Sanchez is taking the whip out.
There are no shots of Sanchez whipping Lupe and (if memory serves me correctly) the off-camera screams of Lupe's lover are not heard.
#16
Posted 17 March 2005 - 09:35 AM
I agree however with the point about trimming the film for the cinema (give it a 12), and then putting stuff back in for the DVD, if that's possible. I'd love to see a meaner, grittier, nastier Bond film with a 15 or an 18 certificate, but I understand that the teenage fanbase is a big one and needs to be catered for.
Curiously enough, I was one of those kids who wanted to see LTK and couldn't because I was only 9 years old. My dad arranged for me to see the film without knowing of the 15 certificate. Luckily for me, I wasn't as big a Bond fan back then as I am now.
#17
Posted 17 March 2005 - 11:58 AM
#18
Posted 17 March 2005 - 03:19 PM
Doesn't matter, i'd be old enough to see it alone if needed (My parents aren't really fazed by me seeing R-rated movies, I saw The Rock in Theatres whenever it came out, I couldn't have been older than 8). I don't think a man getting drilled repeatedly is going to bring down an R-rating, unless they happen to show a frontal view, and Bond's not wearing any pants.
I don't think US fans have to worrry. The US censor is more concerned with sex.
The problem is for UK fans. The censor in the UK is more concerned with violence.
#19
Posted 17 March 2005 - 04:35 PM
#21
Posted 17 March 2005 - 08:39 PM
#22
Posted 17 March 2005 - 08:45 PM
these 2 new candidates are very unknown, Daniel Craig and Julian McMahon.
I wouldn't be able to watch McMahon and not think of him as Cole from the TV show "Charmed."
He doesn't even look like a Bond. Nor does Daniel Craig. They're just people who are supporting actors, like henchman, not the main character like Bond.
#23
Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:23 PM
#24
Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:45 PM
But I remember being amazed that young kids here in the US were in R rated movies back in the late 1980s/early 90's.
#25
Posted 18 March 2005 - 02:12 AM
Even though you don't see anything other than the sound of the whip and Lupes expression, the UK cut ends as Sanchez is taking the whip
#26
Posted 18 March 2005 - 03:33 AM
#27
Posted 18 March 2005 - 04:45 AM
However, the UK censors seem to have the right idea, in my opinion.I don't think US fans have to worrry. The US censor is more concerned with sex.
The problem is for UK fans. The censor in the UK is more concerned with violence.
I agree also...I think one of the reasons America is such a violent society is because the population has become immune to the effects of it. A friend of mine had a gun pulled on her by a 13 year old kid yesterday...
How a kid that young even gets his hands on a gun is beyond me.

#28
Posted 18 March 2005 - 05:20 AM
#30
Posted 18 March 2005 - 04:50 PM
Who was that SMERSH bloke? Is he in the next book/s? Or will you keep it a secret?