Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

CR's torture scene


55 replies to this topic

#1 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:25 PM

Okay, a graphic torture scene may pass the American censors (who care more about keeping the amount of sex down on the screen), but could we see the first 18 rated 007 movie in the UK (where violence is the biggest movie taboo).

Let's also not forget that whereas here in the US kids can see R-rated movies (which always seems a little strange to me), in the UK the 18 rating means just that.

I remember having to take ID to a showing of the 15-rated "Bervely Hills Cop 2" back in the late 1980s and watching all the people under 15 being turned away.

#2 Righty007

Righty007

    Discharged.

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13051 posts
  • Location:Station CLE - Cleveland

Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:30 PM

Casino Royale will be PG-13 in the United States of America.

#3 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:32 PM

I expect it will go for the 15 rating as Licence To Kill did.

#4 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:39 PM

could we see the first 18 rated 007 movie in the UK (where violence is the biggest movie taboo).

View Post


No way. Commercial suicide. I'm told that the British Board of Film Classification threatened LICENCE TO KILL with an 18, but gave it a 15 after the filmmakers agreed to cut it.

I think all the Brosnan films have been 12s. Seems you can get away with quite a lot of violence in the 12 category, judging by the fact that TERMINATOR 3 was given a 12 (although I really can't understand why - it clearly should have been a 15). Then again, MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE II is a 15, and, again, I can't for the life of me see why it's not a 12.

I hope (but don't expect) that they'll go for a 15 with CASINO ROYALE, though.

#5 Mister Asterix

Mister Asterix

    Commodore RNVR

  • The Admiralty
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 15519 posts
  • Location:38.6902N - 89.9816W

Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:48 PM

[mra]Don

#6 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:53 PM

As DLibrasnow points out, the British censors are very tough on violence. They even excised a headbutt from ATTACK OF THE CLONES! I think all of the Brosnan films were censored: a kick to the head trimmed from TOMORROW NEVER DIES, Xenia's butting of Natalya removed from GOLDENEYE, the downmixing of the thwacking sound of punches during fight scenes (hey, too loud and you'll give the kids ideas)....

Curiously enough, though, you can see Bond ripping a woman's bikini top off and strangling her with it, with her bare breasts briefly visible and closeups of Bond looking like he's really getting off on what he's doing, and of the woman looking terrified and in pain.... in a film to which the BBFC gave a PG rating, DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER. Now that just beats me hollow.

#7 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 15 March 2005 - 05:17 PM

could we see the first 18 rated 007 movie in the UK (where violence is the biggest movie taboo).

View Post


No way. Commercial suicide. I'm told that the British Board of Film Classification threatened LICENCE TO KILL with an 18, but gave it a 15 after the filmmakers agreed to cut it.

View Post


Yes, the filmakers did agree to cut LICENSE TO KILL in the UK so that the BBFC would not slap an 18 certificate on it. You are right, an 18 would prohibit anyone under that age from going to the movie (even the 15 obviously hurt LTK) and would lead to greatly reduced box office for the picture.

#8 IndyB007

IndyB007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 15 March 2005 - 05:56 PM

Go ahead and make the next 007 movie rated R or NC17... Bond isn't for children anyway, they have their own Young Bond books...

I mean, just look at how I turned out watching and reading 007 at such an impressionable age! :)

#9 J J

J J

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 331 posts

Posted 15 March 2005 - 07:05 PM

Purvis and Wade wrote a torture scene for TWINE. I don't (dare to) expect this one to be more graphic or spectacular... :)

#10 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 15 March 2005 - 07:59 PM

Curiously enough, though, you can see Bond ripping a woman's bikini top off and strangling her with it, with her bare breasts briefly visible and closeups of Bond looking like he's really getting off on what he's doing, and of the woman looking terrified and in pain.... in a film to which the BBFC gave a PG rating, DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER. Now that just beats me hollow.

View Post


At the time of the release of LICENSE TO KILL, John Glen gave interviews in which he said they had been told by the BBFC that they couldn't get away with things they had shown in the past.

#11 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:04 PM

Go ahead and make the next 007 movie rated R or NC17...

View Post


The problem with that is that a number of US theater chains refuse to show NC-17 movies - no matter how commercial they might be. Still....the US censor doesn't seem to care about violence.

If an 18 certificate was slapped on CR, I am assuming this would effectively prevent some of CBn's UK teenage members from seeing the movie when it is released.

I remember many younger Bond fans being vocally upset that LTK got a 15-certificate because it meant they had to wait until it debuted on video to see it. (check 1989 issues of "007" magazine).

#12 Gabe Vieira

Gabe Vieira

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3873 posts
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa, USA

Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:20 PM

Ya, it won't matter how good Casino Royale is if it's rated R because it would severely cut back on total gross. But, I do suggest that CR is written and filmed with all intention of being an R-rated film, release the PG-13 version in theaters and on DVD, then wait a year or so to release the "Unrated Version" or "Director's Cut" of Casion Royale. That way it would increase the total income on the movie for the studio, and we could get a glimpse of the real Casion Royale.

Oh, and for all you Kill Bill fans: Quentin Tarantino will release Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair (1 and 2 in one film) in wide release later this year- and it's now NC-17.

#13 SPECTRE ASSASSIN

SPECTRE ASSASSIN

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4247 posts
  • Location:S.P.E.C.T.R.E Island, California

Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:22 PM

Interesting observation, Gabe.

#14 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:24 AM

I don't thikn that the torture scene will be graphically violent, but just graphically insinuated like when Sanchez whips Lupe in the Licence To Kill pre-credits.

#15 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:58 AM

That whipping scene was cut from the UK print though Brett.

Even though you don't see anything other than the sound of the whip and Lupes expression, the UK cut ends as Sanchez is taking the whip out.

There are no shots of Sanchez whipping Lupe and (if memory serves me correctly) the off-camera screams of Lupe's lover are not heard.

#16 Scottlee

Scottlee

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2592 posts
  • Location:Leeds, England

Posted 17 March 2005 - 09:35 AM

All that stuff is certainly on the LTK DVD. I watched it the other night.

I agree however with the point about trimming the film for the cinema (give it a 12), and then putting stuff back in for the DVD, if that's possible. I'd love to see a meaner, grittier, nastier Bond film with a 15 or an 18 certificate, but I understand that the teenage fanbase is a big one and needs to be catered for.

Curiously enough, I was one of those kids who wanted to see LTK and couldn't because I was only 9 years old. My dad arranged for me to see the film without knowing of the 15 certificate. Luckily for me, I wasn't as big a Bond fan back then as I am now.

#17 Johnboy007

Johnboy007

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6990 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 17 March 2005 - 11:58 AM

Doesn't matter, i'd be old enough to see it alone if needed (My parents aren't really fazed by me seeing R-rated movies, I saw The Rock in Theatres whenever it came out, I couldn't have been older than 8). I don't think a man getting drilled repeatedly is going to bring down an R-rating, unless they happen to show a frontal view, and Bond's not wearing any pants.

#18 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 17 March 2005 - 03:19 PM

Doesn't matter, i'd be old enough to see it alone if needed (My parents aren't really fazed by me seeing R-rated movies, I saw The Rock in Theatres whenever it came out, I couldn't have been older than 8).  I don't think a man getting drilled repeatedly is going to bring down an R-rating, unless they happen to show a frontal view, and Bond's not wearing any pants.

View Post


I don't think US fans have to worrry. The US censor is more concerned with sex.

The problem is for UK fans. The censor in the UK is more concerned with violence.

#19 Snake

Snake

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 134 posts
  • Location:Britain, UK, Wales

Posted 17 March 2005 - 04:35 PM

I would like it to be a 15 or 18. That would be class, especially Martin Campell is doing it. GoldenEye is one of the better ones of the new ones. And for me, these 2 new candidates are very unknown, Daniel Craig and Julian McMahon. They would put shame to Bond's name. I would prefer Clive Owen or Ewan McGreggor, as well as Christian Bale.

#20 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 17 March 2005 - 07:59 PM

these 2 new candidates are very unknown, Daniel Craig and Julian McMahon.

View Post


I wouldn't be able to watch McMahon and not think of him as Cole from the TV show "Charmed."

#21 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 17 March 2005 - 08:39 PM

[quote name='DLibrasnow' date='17 March 2005 - 10:19'][quote name='Johnboy007' date='17 March 2005 - 06:58']Doesn't matter, i'd be old enough to see it alone if needed (My parents aren't really fazed by me seeing R-rated movies, I saw The Rock in Theatres whenever it came out, I couldn't have been older than 8).

#22 Snake

Snake

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 134 posts
  • Location:Britain, UK, Wales

Posted 17 March 2005 - 08:45 PM

these 2 new candidates are very unknown, Daniel Craig and Julian McMahon.

View Post


I wouldn't be able to watch McMahon and not think of him as Cole from the TV show "Charmed."

View Post



He doesn't even look like a Bond. Nor does Daniel Craig. They're just people who are supporting actors, like henchman, not the main character like Bond.

#23 JackLordIsFelix

JackLordIsFelix

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 198 posts

Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:23 PM

I don't think it would work commercially, although it might be great artistically. U.S. theatres are starting to actually enforce the rating regulations (far more than in the Eighties, DLibrasnow, when you and I grew up). And the studios are reacting accordingly by keeping many of their action features within PG-13 limits, whereas the same films could have been rated R 20 years ago and not be hurt financially one bit (raise your hand if you saw Rambo in the theatre even if you were under 17).

#24 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:45 PM

I grew up in the UK where it has always been strictly enforced.

But I remember being amazed that young kids here in the US were in R rated movies back in the late 1980s/early 90's.

#25 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 18 March 2005 - 02:12 AM

[quote name='DLibrasnow' date='16 March 2005 - 09:58']That whipping scene was cut from the UK print though Brett.

Even though you don't see anything other than the sound of the whip and Lupes expression, the UK cut ends as Sanchez is taking the whip

#26 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 18 March 2005 - 03:33 AM

I prefer a hefty dose of sex and violence. Where can we get that?

#27 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 18 March 2005 - 04:45 AM

I don't think US fans have to worrry. The US censor is more concerned with sex.

The problem is for UK fans. The censor in the UK is more concerned with violence.

View Post

However, the UK censors seem to have the right idea, in my opinion.

View Post


I agree also...I think one of the reasons America is such a violent society is because the population has become immune to the effects of it. A friend of mine had a gun pulled on her by a 13 year old kid yesterday...

How a kid that young even gets his hands on a gun is beyond me. :)

#28 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 18 March 2005 - 05:20 AM

I don't think Americans are necessarily more violent than Britons. We're just far more public about it, just as you're more open about sex. Incidentally (not that you didn't already know this) it's way easier to get a gun in the U.S. The NRA and their allies are inordinately powerful, and politicians see it as taboo (and "left-wing" or "Un-American") to go against them. That's one of the reasons I'm always uneasy when visiting the states (especially a place like Texas, where, to quote a bumper sticker, "gun control means using both hands").

#29 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 18 March 2005 - 06:08 AM

I prefer a hefty dose of sex and violence. Where can we get that?

View Post

Fleming's books.

#30 Snake

Snake

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 134 posts
  • Location:Britain, UK, Wales

Posted 18 March 2005 - 04:50 PM

I just read the torture scene today. If wasn't much but it would hurt, being slashed with a cane. Unless there's another torture...
Who was that SMERSH bloke? Is he in the next book/s? Or will you keep it a secret?