Sounds like there was a great atmosphere, of the kind that you probably only get at Bond screenings (there was a sort of "rock concert" atmosphere when I saw GOLDENEYE and, later, YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE on the big screen with packed houses; obviously, a Bond flick can be just a regular trip to the cinema, but if it's an "event" like a premiere or a showing of an old film, and if the audience is "up for it".... well, you don't need me to tell you

).
What's all this "back to basics" talk? The "basics" are exotic locals, outrageous villains, weird lairs, world domination, control rooms, and women in bikinis.

Granted. But DR. NO does not feature an invisible car, a "buttkicking babe" who's 100% Bond's Equal, machine gun battles and colossal explosions every five minutes, puerile humour ("You always were a cunning linguist, James"

) and unnecessary and unfunny attempts at "comic relief", and bags and bags of pretentious and po-faced tosh about Stockholm Syndrome and the like.
Note that the exotic locales in DR. NO are not only exotic but also authentic; and the picture is soaked in genuinely sophisticated wit, some real suspense, and a very weird atmosphere that's not to be found in any other Bond film, not even FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE or GOLDFINGER. The "grit" is there, I think, but it's all in Connery's (superb) performance - you believe this Bond is very dangerous indeed, but the filmmakers don't have to make the point with "personal missions" and scenes of anger and angst, because it's all there in Connery's attitude.
So I don't think people who talk about "back to basics" are talking at cross purposes with those who want to go "back to DR.NO/Terence Young".
The following thread may be of interest to DR. NO fans:
http://debrief.comma...opic=15238&st=0.