Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

The Countdown - #19


42 replies to this topic

#31 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 27 December 2004 - 06:03 PM

You don't see too much bashing of it (rightly so IMO), compared to some other films.

View Post


I disagree. I think there are plenty of Bond fans (and non-fans) who think the whole Dalton era was a disaster for the franchise and that Dalton was a truly terrible 007. It's true that LICENCE TO KILL seems to be the more hated of the two films, and the film that Dalton-bashers tend to point the finger at when justifying their views, but, still, I think there's quite a bit of mauling of THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS and Dalton in general.

#32 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 27 December 2004 - 06:08 PM

Perhaps I just do not see it as often than. More of Dalton on the whole than of the aspects of The Living Daylights I would say. But yes, more of Licence To Kill.

#33 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 28 March 2005 - 05:22 AM

#19: The Man With The Golden Gun

This is just simply a turkey of a movie. Poor acting, poor direction, and a poor storyline keep this movie from even getting off the ground.

Roger Moore, who was decent in his first go around as Bond in Live And Let Die seems to have lost his way in TMWTGG. He just seems to sleepwalk through the role, as if there is no purpose of him even being there. He is not helped, though, by the horrible script that tries to throw in some nonsense about a solar agitator to give the villian a huge scheme for Bond to destroy.

Sometimes, low-key is what is needed in a Bond film, and if there were ever a film that this was true for, it's TMWTGG. Instead of Bond having to track down who has the solar agitator, why didn't the writers just keep the plot to Scaramanga trying to assassinate Bond. It could have been much better this way, with Bond and Scaramanga playing a cat and mouse game throughout the film. Unfortunately, this is not the case and the film becomes a tangled mess.

Christopher Lee is well cast in the role of Scaramanga, but he's not given anything to do. Britt Ekland is one of the worst Bond girls ever, only in front of Halle Berry's Jinx. Goodnight could have been such a good character, but Brit reduces her to a complete moron. The only reason that she beats out Jinx as a Bond girl is that she's easier on the eyes. Both of their performances, though, were just dreadful.

Maud Adams is terrible in her role as Andrea Anders. She is much better a few years later in Octopussy. Even M and Q are made to look like incompetent fools in this film. It's just a downright awful film that the producers should consider withdrawing from the official 007 series and consider going back and remaking.

The musical score is okay, but LuLu's title track is flat out awful. If they wanted someone to sound like Shirley Bassey, as LuLu has claimed that she was forced to do when recording the track, then John Barry should have just gone out and gotten Shirley Bassey to do another Bond theme. Just let the performers perform it the way that they would normally, that's why you picked them instead of Shirley Bassey!

It's good to see that they recovered from this one to make one of the finer entries, The Spy Who Loved Me, but The Man With The Golden Gun leaves an unnecessary black-eye on the Bond franchise. It could have been so much better, yet it self-destructs on practically every level.

#34 trumanlodge89

trumanlodge89

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 615 posts

Posted 24 August 2005 - 03:41 AM

#19

Die Another Day


Do I hate it like I hate Moonraker? No. Do I like it? Not much. Pierce is all right. Halle Berry won an Oscar for Monsters Ball while filming this movie. If not for her performence as Jinx in this movie, she should give the trophy back for Catwoman. There was talk of giving Halle a spin-off for her Jinx character. Did it fall apart because EON realized how bad she was in Die Another Day? It's likely. Rosamund Pike is much stronger as Miranda Frost, however she is underused. Toby Stephens isn't particularly menacing as Gustav Graves, and Rick Yune as Zao dies too early. John Cleese slips seemlessly into his new role as Q, and includes a couple nice nods of tribute to the late Desmond Llewelyn.

This movie starts strong, with a great hovercraft chase on the teaser sequence, however, instead of ending with a funny quip from Bond ("Saved by the Bell") we get to watch him captured and tortured as we ourselves are tortured with a hideous title theme by Madonna. Don't worry, she has an insignificant cameo later. After Bond is allowed to leave camp, the movie picks up again, with a great sequence in Hong Kong and a solid set piece in Cuba. (backed by awesome music from David Arnold) Next comes the best scene in the movie, the sword fight in Blades. I won't bother to tell you anything about the rest of the movie, because nothing of value happens. Nothing besides bad CGI, a stupid DNA modification plot, and a rehash of Diamonds are Forever, which wasn't that great in 1971, and yet Purvis and Wade managed to make Connery's swansong look less campy.

I'd say it's about time for a series reboot.

#35 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 24 August 2005 - 07:01 AM

#19, for me, is definitely "LTK" because it looks medicore, it has a ridiculous coda, a Bond that has lost his humor and tries to be hip by being uselessly violent and instead just is strained and at times even boring. Dalton was so much better in "TLD".

#36 Double-Oh Agent

Double-Oh Agent

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4325 posts

Posted 20 October 2005 - 08:36 AM

#19 -- The Man With The Golden Gun

The Man With The Golden Gun is probably the most lackluster Bond film. For whatever reason something just seems to be missing. Maybe it's the dated energy crisis plot or the lack of a truly interesting Bond girl but the film is like an eight-cylinder car firing on only six cylinders.

First the bad--M and Q's scenes are the worst in the series for the both of them. M's in a perpetual bad mood and Q is overly talkative in a rambling sort of way. Britt Ekland's Mary Goodnight is not a highlight. It is not so much her effort but the script which leaves her character as a bumbling ignoramous. It's enough to make one wonder how she got into the service to serve as Bond's secretary or then transferred to such an important station as Hong Kong. The kung-fu fight with Hip's nieces is also a disappointment as they dispatch the students way too easily and Bond just stands there watching instead of helping them and Hip fight. The score is also disappointing as it is probably John Barry's worst of the series.

As for the good--Christopher Lee's Francisco Scaramanga adds much-needed menace to the film although I find him just a tad too urbane for the million-dollar hitman. The 360-degree aerial jump is one of the best stunts of the series but is somewhat marred by the slide whistle. The best scene in the movie is when Bond meets Lazar and points the three-fingered gun. Roger Moore's line of "Speak now or forever hold your piece" has to rank as one of the five best lines in any Bond film. I also like the suspense built up during Bond's attempt to retrieve the Solex when the sun is hidden behind a cloud. I also think Herve Villechaize's Nick Nack works. Why not have a midget henchman, especially when you have such a dangerous villain? Nick Nack's funny and a threat in his own right. And the golden gun is an ingeniously crafted weapon. It makes perfect sense for a hitman like Scaramanga to use such a cleverly disguised gun to get around customs and metal detectors.

#37 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 20 October 2005 - 01:32 PM

Cheers for the review, Double-Oh Agent! :)

#38 A Kristatos

A Kristatos

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 609 posts
  • Location:Chicago, USA

Posted 13 November 2005 - 07:33 AM

#19 Live And let Die


Plot:

Here's a movie that just seems too bizarre for my tastes. Mainly a mish-mosh of voodoo, psychic readings and one long chase after another, this movie never could quite find a smooth flow of plot and action. In addition, what plot there is just rambles on too long. Not that I mind a slow plot, but I would like one that is detailed, moves along somewhat and doesn't just stall out for a long while. Unfortunately, there's just not much to work with here.

Acting:
Roger Moore has a decent debut as Bond, but he is obviously still trying to find the right tone here, as he comes across a little brash and cocky at times. No other major problems with the supporting cast, though the absence of Q was a real mistake by the producers. Also, David Hedison's Felix was by far the best in the series. J.W. Pepper was also entertaining as the foul mouthed Louisiana sheriff.

Score:
The George Martin score, while not terrible by any means, seemed more suited for Starsky And Hutch rather than a Bond movie. However, the Paul McCartney sung title theme is certainly one of the series best!

Why Number 19?
While certainly not the worst movie of all time, Live And Let Die does suffer from a slow moving plot, and a mish-mash of elements that don't quite lead to a smooth movie. There some fun moments to be sure, but ultimately, this is not the most memorable Bond film.

#39 Major Bloodnok

Major Bloodnok

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 264 posts
  • Location:Titletown, U.S.A.

Posted 13 November 2005 - 08:51 PM

20. TMWTGG

19. A VIEW TO A KILL

Christopher Walken... must've been having a bad year. Bad story. Bad acting. Not interesting. The final battle atop the bridge was not inspiring.

Oh, and Tanya Roberts.

#40 PierceConneryMoore

PierceConneryMoore

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 82 posts
  • Location:Las Vegas, Nevada

Posted 07 January 2006 - 05:42 AM

#19 DAF

Only mildly better than OHMSS

Problems:

1.It's way too silly even for a Bond movie.

2.The plot is proposterous & lame.

3.Charles Gray is easily the worst Blofeld.

4.Most of the henchmen were lame.

5.The climax was one of the weakest action scenes in Bond history.

Good Things:

1.Connery's back, even if a little older & sometimes seems a little tired.

2.Jill St.John is underrated & brings real attitude & style as Tiffany Case.

3.Mr.Wynt & Mr.Kidd are great henchmen whom admittedly don't belong in a Bond movie but that's part of what makes them so good. They're menacing with a sense of humor that makes them even more menacing.

5.The Bambi & Thumper scene is great.

6.The action scenes are fun if not as good as as the 4 previous Bond films. The most notable mentions are the car chase through Fremont Street, the elevator fight & again the Bambi & Thumper scene.

7.This was filmed in Las Vegas where I live & in a way that makes te movie a little more fun to watch. Whenever I go down Fremont Street Downtown, I think of the car chase.

Overall:The movie is marginally better than the worst, OHMSS, mainly cause of Connery & the fact it was shot in Las Vegas. It's extremely stupid & is trying to hard to capture the spirit of Goldfinger & the earlier Bond films. At least it was fun & it had Connery.

#41 Dr. Kananga

Dr. Kananga

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 110 posts

Posted 19 December 2006 - 09:36 PM

19. Diamonds are Forever

Not horrible, but boring, slow, and weak plots make it a bad film. This was the second disrace to Sean Connery, the first being leaving for 1 movie and then coming bakc to this! I would rather watch DAD(Good) than watch this.

5 1/2/10

#42 O.H.M.S.S.

O.H.M.S.S.

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1162 posts
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 29 July 2008 - 01:24 PM

19. Die Another Day
Halle Berry is a memorable Bond girl, the car chase is great. Apart from that it is a Bond film closer to xXx than to its predecessors.

#43 Fiona Volpe lover

Fiona Volpe lover

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 347 posts

Posted 08 August 2008 - 07:06 PM

#19 A VIEW TO A KILL

There's a huge gap from Licence To Kill to the second worst Bond movie, and in fact A View To A Kill is not an especially bad film. It's certainly recognisably a Bond film. It features all the things you expect from a Bond film. The trouble is, it's a Bond movie on autopilot. It feels incredibly tired, as it everyone just wanted to get the film out of the way. It seems to continually rehash bits and pieces from other Bond films, but very weakly. It often feels like a pale echo of several proceeding ones.

The basic aim was the continue the feel and formula that, that for the most part had worked for Octopussy. A combination of For Your Eyes Only seriousness and Moonraker silliness which resulted in Octopussy being a very schizophrenic Bond film, but a very entertaining one. In A View To A Kill, the tone is weighted towards the 'realistic' end, but in a way that all glamour and much of the feel of escapism just goes out of the window. A View To A Kill is one of the several Bond fiilms that suffered from having a lower budget than normal, and suffers from it most. The title sequence has bits from The Spy Who Loved Me's title sequence plastered on it for goodness sake! The film had a drab look and can't even make Paris and San Francisco look good. It lingers in tourist cliche-the first sight of Paris is of two holiday makers photographing it- and never attempts to go into actuall local colour.

When A View To A Kill does put in the odd 'silly' moment, such as Bond driving the front half of his car after the back half has been removed, they just seem out of place with the general style and feel of the film. And as for Snooper, the most pointless, idiotic gadget ever, words fail me. The basic plot is Goldfinger rehashed, down to even having several parellel scenes, but some elements are really clumsy-watching this film you could be forgiven that microchips are dug out of the ground. There's also no sense of urgency or growing tension. There is actually plenty of action, but the bits in between are often quite boring due to the dull and disinterested feel. Bond making a quiche might well be the character's low point in the entire series.

As for the action scenes, the pre credits ski chase is pretty good until the Beach Boys come on, the Eiffel Tower chase is okay while it lasts but afterwards has a feeling of being a bit wasted despite May Day's jump, the steeple chase sequence is quite clever but rarely looks convincing, the two brief underwater bits unexciting, the burning lift IS genuinely exciting, the jokey chase in San Francisco with Bond hanging on a fire engine ladder is a fun bit of nonsense but badly needs Sherriff JW Pepper in place of the police captain lacking in personality here, the mine stuff in most of the final quarter just bores, and the climax-well, never has Roger Moore's stuntman seemed more obvious as when he's hanging on the airship, and never has the series had as abysmal back projection as when Bond is fighting Max Zorin atop the Golden Gate Bridge. The fight itself is basic and really quite poor. All this is evidence that A View To A Kill has tons of action, but still feels slow and lazy.

Roger Moore just goes through the motions here and he really seems to have aged drastically in the two years since Octopussy. Tanya Roberts as Stacy Sutton is as forgettable and badly acted as Pam Bouvier and a great deal more annoying. Grace Jones as May Day does have a striking presence but is wasted as the film seems to be building up to a fight between her and Bond which doesn't happen. Her change of sides seems like a hurried script rewrite [of course we can't have Moore fighting womnen can we?]. Christopher Walken as Max Zorin is monotonous despite his character's intriguing history. Davil Yip's Chuck Lee must be Bond's dullest ally. The two best cast members are Patrick Macnee as Tibbett, who has some great banter with Bond as an agent posing as his chauffeur, and Fiona Fullerton's Pola Ivanova, whose dalliance with Bond ends with a great gag involving tape swapping.

Other good points? Aubergine's death is one of the most inventive and surreal of the Moore era. Duran Duran's theme song is great, not that 'Bondian' but catchy and John Barry's fairly low key score, which includes an action theme that is reminiscent of the great On Her Majesty's Secret Service theme, is solid and is a great improvement on his lazy Octopussy score although it's still not that interesting. Most aspects of the film are professionally done,there's just no spark to any of it.

A View To A Kill is a poor and very lacklustre Bond film but all said and done it's still quite fun in places and as a whole isn't a total disgrace! I still quite enjoy watching it, but than it's still a Bond film, isn't it?