
The Persuaders
#1
Posted 29 October 2004 - 03:02 PM
#2
Posted 29 October 2004 - 07:37 PM
This is most likely where the idea came from.
#3
Posted 29 October 2004 - 08:10 PM
#4
Posted 30 October 2004 - 06:57 AM
#5
Posted 30 October 2004 - 12:44 PM
#6
Posted 31 October 2004 - 10:01 AM
#7
Posted 31 October 2004 - 03:21 PM
#8
Posted 31 October 2004 - 06:42 PM
#9
Posted 01 November 2004 - 08:33 AM
#10
Posted 02 November 2004 - 03:52 PM
http://www.bbcameric..._persuaders.jsp
#11
Posted 13 November 2004 - 11:50 PM
Great show! To write fan fiction would be fun, too.
#12
Posted 14 November 2004 - 04:14 AM
#13
Posted 14 November 2004 - 01:21 PM
#14
Posted 19 December 2004 - 02:01 AM
This is fast becoming my favorite show. I was born in '71, so it's interesting to see how people dressed back then. And I thought the early 1970s were boring... The era does have it's charm...
#15
Posted 19 December 2004 - 02:38 AM
#16
Posted 19 December 2004 - 02:51 AM

By the way, it would appear that the premiere "Persuaders!" site, Blofeld'scat.com's domain has lapsed. What a shame, as it's the only place on the net that does the show any justice in terms of fan sites. Hopefully, it will be back up soon.
#17
Posted 19 December 2004 - 02:52 AM
#18
Posted 19 December 2004 - 03:36 AM
I got mine last Christmas from Deep Discount DVD when they had a 20 percent off everything sale. Do some searching and you can find them for a decent price, especially if it's becoming your favorite show.I'm seriously thinking of getting the DVDs for this show, but have read on Amazon.com that there are some sound problems on a few episodes, like it wasn't synchronized properly. Can anyone provide some more information on this? Besides, those sets are friggin' expensive!!! And for a show with just 24 episodes.
This is fast becoming my favorite show. I was born in '71, so it's interesting to see how people dressed back then. And I thought the early 1970s were boring... The era does have it's charm...
Can't speak about any of the synchronization problems, though.
#19
Posted 19 December 2004 - 03:38 AM
#21
Posted 19 December 2004 - 07:03 AM

OK, he was excellent as James Bond, but in some way he was above playing this character.

Roger Moore is what I'd call a 'celebrity actor', and playing James Bond was just a routine part for him. And I don't think that any actor could, or would of been able to take over from the definitive James Bond, Sean Connery.
Roger Moore is a self contained institution in his own right.
Cheers,
Luisa Moore.

#23
Posted 19 December 2004 - 07:42 AM
After you've seen Rog in 'The Persuaders' you'll know what I mean.I seem to be hearing that more often lately. Pretty interesting.
Roger played himself in 'The Saint' and in 'The Persuaders' and he was bloody good.
Playing James Bond he kinda had a problem with the part. He was too nice to play a killer who killed in a cold way. OK, he was a very good James Bond, but it didn't suit his character.
You could say that he was the best actor to play the part because it was out of his usual 'persona'. And in my opinion, I prefer him because of his stellar and self defecating approach to a very hard role.
To me, Sean is the boss, but Roger hold the key to the shop.
Cheers,
Ian
#24
Posted 19 December 2004 - 07:44 AM
#26
Posted 19 December 2004 - 01:29 PM
I just hope there won't be a remake of the serie as the chemestry between Roger and T. Curtis was unique and perfect... I've heard in a recent past about Nicolas Cage playing Danny Wilde and Hugh Grant as Lord Sinclo. No, no!
I must admit I do prefer Roger as Simon Templar and Lord Sinclair rather than as Bond even if he is and will stay from far the best one

#27
Posted 19 December 2004 - 03:00 PM

Qwerty, if you haven't seen "The Persuaders!" Do so now! It's a great show, very early seventies in style, music, etc., But most of all, it's fun.
As for a movie remake: Please, no! There are movies and TV shows best to remain in their era of origin (The Avengers, The Saint, The Mod Squad) because those shows are so representative of that time. And it's pretty much a given that the Hollywood hacks are going to "re-imagine" and "update" a "Persuaders!" movie. Besides, the world isn't as mod, funky or cool anymore.

And not to beat this topic to death, but Roger Moore is still the second-best Bond ever. No small feat considering he was "all wrong" for the role.
#28
Posted 19 December 2004 - 03:54 PM
And in my opinion, I prefer him because of his stellar and self defecating approach to a very hard role.
Bondian, when you say "self defecating" approach, would this be because you feel all his roles have a manure like consistency to them; perhaps you feel he just squeezes them out between cigarette puffs; or more likely you feel his portrayal just dumps on those of all other pretenders to the role?
I'm not sure I follow but if perhaps you would be good enough to unload the true essence of your thoughts, that would better qualify your input and indeed enlighten the board members.
For which, many thanks.
#29
Posted 19 December 2004 - 03:58 PM
He even designed himself his clothes.
He didn't actually - there was an interview with him that included this topic. they were designed elsewhere and just had his name attached as a sales gimmick.
To quote him, "It happened as a gimmick but in the end, no one gave a ****."
#30
Posted 19 December 2004 - 09:01 PM
I think The Persuaders!, along with The Avengers and The Saint, is probably my number one show ever.I'm seriously thinking of getting the DVDs for this show, but have read on Amazon.com that there are some sound problems on a few episodes, like it wasn't synchronized properly. Can anyone provide some more information on this? Besides, those sets are friggin' expensive!!! And for a show with just 24 episodes.
This is fast becoming my favorite show. I was born in '71, so it's interesting to see how people dressed back then. And I thought the early 1970s were boring... The era does have it's charm...
There are a few places in one or two episodes in which the lip synch is off. It's annoying, sure, but it doesn't last very long when it does happen.
You could get the Region 2 DVDs for a much cheaper price, but the picture isn't nearly as clean and bright as it is on the Region 1.