
GOLDFINGER
#1
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:25 AM
what are the things that really jive with you about this movie?
what are the things you dont like?
#2
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:28 AM
--score
--title songs
--characters
--plot
Dislike
--It's often overrated by many generic ratings and so, just a pet peeve I guess
#3
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:46 AM
i thought connery's wardrobe was very good here-
the music was top notch
the story was very good (and a strong story at that)
it had some very memorable characters (oddjob and his hat really standout and are great)
#4
Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:45 AM
- Goldfinger, Oddjob and Pussy are ALL great villains. That's very unique. We're usually lucky to get one.
- Connery's ability to crack jokes, show fear and still be a man's man, all in one.
- Q shows up!
- Aston Martin!!
- The prototypical Bond theme song.
- The "laser table" and Jill painted gold are immortal images in film history.
- I think the scheme about irradiating the gold is ingenious, better than the book's version.
Don't like:
- Bond himself doesn't actually do a whole heck of a lot in the film since he spends so much of it captured.
- Cec Linder as Leiter.
- The mixup with the "three ticks" on the clock.
- The joke about the Beatles.
I don't think it's the best of them all, but I'd call it top 3.
#5
Posted 11 September 2004 - 06:30 AM
I've actually read a few negative reviews of the film before on forums.It has been said by some that this is THE Bond film of bond films and there are some great things about this movie that would make some feel this way and i dont believe i have ever heard someone come out and really diss this film...
i thought connery's wardrobe was very good here-
the music was top notch
the story was very good (and a strong story at that)
it had some very memorable characters (oddjob and his hat really standout and are great)
#6
Posted 11 September 2004 - 09:19 AM

The only weak spot is the woman who plays Jill Masterson, compared to Blackman and Eaton, her inexperience shows and she comes across as being much too strident (it's almost a relief when she cops it).
#7
Posted 11 September 2004 - 12:26 PM
Other than that, it's about as good as a Bond film gets. Leave me on a desert island with this film, FRWL and OHMSS and I'd be happy as Larry.
#8
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:09 PM

Dislike: The Terrycloth jumpsuit!

#9
Posted 11 September 2004 - 04:43 PM
Or Octopussy, if they're adolescent boys.
#10
Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:16 PM
#11
Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:28 PM
Again here we are to tell why we love this movie and what we dont like about it-
what are the things that really jive with you about this movie?
Nearly all of it. Even the terrycloth jumpsuit. It's always good for a laugh.
what are the things you dont like?
The fact that it seems to be the most studio-bound of the Bond films. This is painfully obvious in the Miami Beach sequence when a clearly Miami-filmed Cec Linder/Felix Leiter abruptly cuts to a Pinewood studio Miami replete with Connery/Bond, Gert Frobe/Goldfinger, Shirley Eaton/Jill, Bob Willis/Mr. Simmons and extras all performing in front of a screen backdrop rather than the authentic location. Even Dr. No and From Russia With Love with their lower budgets seem more authentic, picturesque and travelogue-ish than Goldfinger. But this is the only aspect of Goldfinger I dislike.
#12
Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:40 PM
Dislike: The Terrycloth jumpsuit!

Wave of the future.
bond being captured did seem to get old in a hurry
I didn't see it as a problem in this movie.
#13
Posted 11 September 2004 - 07:53 PM
dittoConsidering it's one of the films two key action set-pieces, I'd have liked the scene with the DB5 at Auric Enterprises to have lasted longer. And things start to feel a bit rushed after the bit where the nuclear device is defused.
Other than that, it's about as good as a Bond film gets. Leave me on a desert island with this film, FRWL and OHMSS and I'd be happy as Larry.
#14
Posted 12 September 2004 - 04:27 PM
1. Were there three ticks or 7?
2. Were was Laila? (Laila, one of the hottest women ever to appear in a bond film, was the bellydancer in the previous Bond film, From Russia With Love)
3. Although I liked Cec Linder's Felix Leiter, the Leiter character aged exceptionally fast. (This is a pet peeve I have with the whole series. Leiter's age and appearance change inexplicably throughout the series. If you count NSNA, Leiter even changes color)
Other than that, I can't think of anything wrong with GOLDFINGER. I originally had problems w/Goldfinger spending all that money on illustrating his plan, only to kill them off minutes later. If I were a greedy mudduck like Goldfinger, I would have saved my money on the scale models. But after seeing Goldfinger a couple of times, the over-the-top presentation & Goldfinger's enthusiasm of the project are part of the movie's charm.
#15
Posted 13 September 2004 - 01:10 AM
That's the one part of the film I dislike. I really wish they could've filmed Sean at the Fountainbleu.The fact that it seems to be the most studio-bound of the Bond films. This is painfully obvious in the Miami Beach sequence when a clearly Miami-filmed Cec Linder/Felix Leiter abruptly cuts to a Pinewood studio Miami replete with Connery/Bond, Gert Frobe/Goldfinger, Shirley Eaton/Jill, Bob Willis/Mr. Simmons and extras all performing in front of a screen backdrop rather than the authentic location. Even Dr. No and From Russia With Love with their lower budgets seem more authentic, picturesque and travelogue-ish than Goldfinger. But this is the only aspect of Goldfinger I dislike.
#16
Posted 13 September 2004 - 01:11 AM
Connery says three, countdown stopped at 0.0.7A couple of pet peeves:
1. Were there three ticks or 7?
#17
Posted 13 September 2004 - 04:59 PM
I like the precredits, the villains, the suspense, Fort Knox, the Aston Martin, the scene with M, Connery, the dialogue and the laser table sequence. Other than that, I have a lot of trouble seeing GF is the best, other than it set the spy trend and became the series' first runaway hit. It's one of those cases where you just had to be there to get the grasp of why it's so revered.
-I know you don't watch Bonds for great acting and direction, but there are just too many things that seem lazy, like the way the soldiers fall at Fort Knox, the rear projection, the special effects (who is that guy behind the curtain when GF enters the plane cabin near the end?). Such things make GF, at least for me, the most dated of the '60s Bonds for me.
-Nothing in the action department really stands out. As others have pointed out, it's a cycle of Bond being captured, escaping and recaptured. So many people complain about TB's underwater stuff being too slow and uninvolving, but from the time Bond is on Goldfinger's personal jet up to the Fort Knox scenes, the story becomes uninvolving. Especially the scenes with Oddjob driving Solo to be crushed and Leiter's pursuit.
-Cec Linder's Leiter. Well, enough said on this one.
-The hoods are so cartoonish with their "Whatarya tryin' ta pull, Goldfinga" comments. And even if he did pull off the caper, how would GF be able to avoid the mafia the rest of his life?
I've tried over the years, but GF just doesn't grab me enough to consider it great.
#18
Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:45 PM
#19
Posted 13 September 2004 - 09:33 PM
#20
Posted 13 September 2004 - 09:36 PM
Or perhaps other Bond films could, had more fans noticed them. I think there are quite a few candidates....but Goldfinger makes a lasting impression like no other Bond film.
#21
Posted 13 September 2004 - 09:52 PM
I'd like to hear them, Qwerty.Or perhaps other Bond films could, had more fans noticed them. I think there are quite a few candidates....but Goldfinger makes a lasting impression like no other Bond film.
#22
Posted 13 September 2004 - 10:03 PM
#23
Posted 13 September 2004 - 10:43 PM
"The Spy Who Loved Me"?? Don't make me laugh.
Edited by RJJB, 13 September 2004 - 10:48 PM.
#24
Posted 13 September 2004 - 10:45 PM
Yes it is. I'll admit that for sure, just pointing out that indeed other 'close' ones exist also.You can "what if" all you want, but the simple truth is that Goldfinger is the most influential movie in the series.
#25
Posted 13 September 2004 - 11:17 PM
The plot does not seem so far fetched and is pretty realistic. I mean... who wouldn't want to rob Fort Knox?
Frobe's personification of Goldfiner is marvellous. This madman that is more than obsessed with gold but at the same time can be a ruthless assasin.
Oddjob is a classic henchmen. He never says a word, yet he manages to transmit his menacing personality through his looks and that "killer hat".
Here the tradition of the Bond girls names begins with Pussy Galore.
Then there is the Aston Martin and that scene with Q in tha laboratory.
They should have included in the movie my favorite Ian Fleming quote "In Chicago we have a saying. Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence and the third time it is enemy action"
Well I think I could go on and on... on why I love so much this film.
#26
Posted 13 September 2004 - 11:25 PM
Interesting way of saying it, considering the book versus the film. Still, the film works better.The plot does not seem so far fetched and is pretty realistic. I mean... who wouldn't want to rob Fort Knox?
#27
Posted 19 September 2004 - 10:06 PM
Dislike: The jumpy, silent car crash
#28
Posted 07 October 2004 - 12:42 AM
Pussy Galore
The car chase
Theme song
Oddjob, Goldfinger
Golden Girl
Dislikes:
People calling it the best bond(little pet peeve)
The score
The scenes at the stud farm
The amount of screen time for Tania Mallet