The Richie Fahey CBn Interview CBn talks to the artist responsible for bringing Bond back to the 1950s |
The Richie Fahey CBn Interview
#1
Posted 08 September 2004 - 05:46 AM
#2
Posted 08 September 2004 - 05:58 AM
#3
Posted 08 September 2004 - 11:36 AM
#4
Posted 08 September 2004 - 12:14 PM
#5
Posted 08 September 2004 - 04:29 PM
How cool he used Red's site as reference!
I would love to see his original, full cover for Thunderball. Here's the back cover art he's referring too.
Congrats again Matt. Another terrific CBn Interview.
#6
Posted 08 September 2004 - 08:22 PM
I am glad those points were brought up about the Thunderball cover and the On Her Majesty's Secret Service cover font.
#7
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:21 AM
I was very surprised to hear that Ian Fleming Publications/Estate was disappointed with Fahey's cover design for Casino Royale. It seems that IFP/E objected to the Fahey's 1950's pulp style. Is it possible that IFP/E was taken aback because they felt that the Fleming novels were more sophisticated than typical pulp fiction of the era?
I don't quite understand why IFP/E thinks so highly of the covers of the UK Penguin Modern Classics editions. Although they are clean in design, they seem rather dull to me.
Fahey covers seem to promise more adventure, suspense, danger, and sex and illustrate many of the themes or events in the books. Something that the UK Penguin Moden Classics edition covers don't do.
I'm certainly not very enthusiastic about the abstract photographic images created by Toby McFarlan Pond for the 2002 Penguin paperback editions as well.
Is IFP/E moving the James Bond literary series in the wrong direction trying to make the Fleming books more sophisticated than they really are? Although Fleming is an excellent writer, shouldn't the James Bond books be shelved with the pulp thrillers of the era, instead of the literary classics?
#8
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:26 AM
I agree. While I'd still like to collect both versions, the US covers are the ones that I would choose firstly being presented both.Fahey covers seem to promise more adventure, suspense, danger, and sex and illustrate many of the themes or events in the books. Something that the UK Penguin Moden Classics edition covers don't do.
#9
Posted 09 September 2004 - 03:01 AM
Perhaps Fleming belongs in his own category: Pulp Literature....
Is IFP/E moving the James Bond literary series in the wrong direction trying to make the Fleming books more sophisticated than they really are? Although Fleming is an excellent writer, shouldn't the James Bond books be shelved with the pulp thrillers of the era, instead of the literary classics?
(You heard it here first. )
#10
Posted 09 September 2004 - 06:42 AM
#11
Posted 09 September 2004 - 10:57 AM
Rather similar to the Signet cover if I recall correctly.Great interview Matt! (And a great layout, Mr. Asterix.) Very interesting stuff. I love these covers. I'm encouraged that it was the Fleming Estate who encouraged this "reto" approach, but they also sound like a typical board of "suits." "No nudity!"....then, "Where's the nudity?" LOL.
How cool he used Red's site as reference!
I would love to see his original, full cover for Thunderball. Here's the back cover art he's referring too.
Congrats again Matt. Another terrific CBn Interview.
#12
Posted 09 September 2004 - 02:13 PM
It's always great to get Bond info straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak.
#13
Posted 09 September 2004 - 07:47 PM
#14
Posted 11 September 2004 - 06:23 AM
#15
Posted 11 September 2004 - 01:27 PM
#16
Posted 03 June 2005 - 01:12 AM
#18
Posted 11 September 2006 - 01:24 AM
Edited by Kilroy6644, 11 September 2006 - 01:24 AM.
#19
Posted 11 September 2006 - 01:29 AM
Wotcha doin' over here, ya bloody traitor. ROFLMAO.That was a really neat interview. I guess I never realized that those were actually photographs. I always assumed that they were paintings. Well, that explains the amazing detail on the Kalashnikov on the Octopussy cover. Now if only it wasn't reversed.
Great to see you here, Bud.
Kilroy is my right-hand man at nearly all my domains. Cannot blame him really. Have tied him down, and one of his own guns are pointed at his crotch. LOL.
Great to see you here, my friend.
Okay. Back to The Richie Fahey Interview.
Cheers,
Ian
#20
Posted 11 September 2006 - 01:57 AM
You may have one of my own guns pointed at my crotch, but I think you've failed to take into account how much I love my guns....
#21
Posted 11 September 2006 - 02:06 AM
I knew you would, my friend.Yeah, I've been here about a week and a half. I like it.
ROFLMAO. "Why don't you loosen you're bullets".You may have one of my own guns pointed at my crotch, but I think you've failed to take into account how much I love my guns....
Hey. Wonder if we can get the rest of the gang here. Where JBJ these days?.
Ciao.
Ian
#22
Posted 11 September 2006 - 02:15 AM
I don't know. I haven't heard from him in months. It sure would be great to have the old gang back together.Hey. Wonder if we can get the rest of the gang here. Where JBJ these days?.
#23
Posted 07 December 2008 - 08:03 AM
Is IFP/E moving the James Bond literary series in the wrong direction trying to make the Fleming books more sophisticated than they really are? Although Fleming is an excellent writer, shouldn't the James Bond books be shelved with the pulp thrillers of the era, instead of the literary classics?
I see no reason they can't be both - 'pulp' is a genre, which is only a categorical term, and has no bearing on the book's shelf life as 'literary classics,' which is a qualifier.
There's no reason the novels can't be marketed both ways, and if there is a problem, it's not with the approach, but with the execution.
Edited by Superhobo, 07 December 2008 - 08:08 AM.
#24
Posted 10 October 2013 - 11:38 PM
I can't find the interview on the site at all. I click on links and get nothing.
Randy
#25
Posted 11 October 2013 - 10:40 PM
http://commanderbond...-interview.html
#26
Posted 11 October 2013 - 11:01 PM
Thank you Commander RNVR.
Randy