
CRThe next Jamesbond movie after Bond 20 wil in 2004 0f 2005 or later ?
#1
Posted 30 August 2001 - 10:31 AM
#2
Posted 30 August 2001 - 11:14 PM
#3
Posted 17 November 2001 - 05:48 PM
#4
Posted 17 November 2001 - 05:16 PM
rafterman (17 Nov, 2001 02:28 a.m.):
...but if they skip 2007 then that's just plain stupid...
Maybe they could come to a compromise with Pierce and do the next two Bonds at a two and a half year pace. Bond 21 in the summer of 2005 and Bond 22 in the winter of '007.
#5
Posted 17 November 2001 - 01:23 PM
#6
Posted 17 November 2001 - 02:28 AM
#7
Posted 30 August 2001 - 10:47 AM
It all depends on Pierce Brosnan. Should he stay on as Bond you would say 2005 and then one in 2007, in anyone passes 2007 they're stupid!
If Brosnan retires after Bond 20 I'd say 2004!
#8
Posted 30 August 2001 - 05:33 PM
#9
Posted 17 September 2001 - 06:41 PM
#10
Posted 16 September 2001 - 06:16 PM
zencat (31 Aug, 2001 12:14 a.m.):
Good theory. I think MGM would like them to go back to a 2-year cycle. Heck, I think MGM would like a Bond movie every year!
Wouldn't we all?
#11
Posted 17 September 2001 - 03:23 PM
What, and end up with a bunch of TMWTGG's. :-)zencat (31 Aug, 2001 12:14 a.m.):
Heck, I think MGM would like a Bond movie every year!
Every 2-3 years is just about right.
#12
Posted 30 August 2001 - 11:05 PM
Brosnan has asked for this 3 year cycle at the moment, MGM are just saying it's a part of their plan or whatever.
So once Brosnan steps aside we'll probably go back to the old two year cycle
