DAF: Is Fleming dissapointed in his villains?
#1
Posted 15 July 2004 - 07:30 PM
It seems everyone agrees that the villains are not as good as Le Chiffre, Mr. Big or Hugo Drax.
It seems to me Fleming feels the same way: he is constatntly having Bond think of them just as thugs etc. Now I know that Bond will come to realize how dangerous they can be, but by that time it will be too late for we readers: Fleming has already brainwashed us that they are small time and not that dangerous and compared to his previous villains they aren't.
#2
Posted 15 July 2004 - 07:32 PM
You hit it exactly B007GLE. They are the deepest dissapointment of the book. Fleming tries so hard, a bit too hard I think to make them out to be larger than life, but their lack of actual time in the book hurts them. They turn out to be rather mediocre I think. Actions speak louder than words, and words were just not enough in this case.Now I know that Bond will come to realize how dangerous they can be, but by that time it will be too late for we readers: Fleming has already brainwashed us that they are small time and not that dangerous and compared to his previous villains they aren't.
#3
Posted 15 July 2004 - 07:36 PM
Plus flemings words mostly belittle the bad guys. There is no building them up like he did with Mr. Big and Drax.You hit it exactly B007GLE. They are the deepest dissapointment of the book. Fleming tries so hard, a bit too hard I think to make them out to be larger than life, but their lack of actual time in the book hurts them. They turn out to be rather mediocre I think. Actions speak louder than words, and words were just not enough in this case.Now I know that Bond will come to realize how dangerous they can be, but by that time it will be too late for we readers: Fleming has already brainwashed us that they are small time and not that dangerous and compared to his previous villains they aren't.
#4
Posted 15 July 2004 - 07:39 PM
You're reading my mind.Plus flemings words mostly belittle the bad guys. There is no building them up like he did with Mr. Big and Drax.You hit it exactly B007GLE. They are the deepest dissapointment of the book. Fleming tries so hard, a bit too hard I think to make them out to be larger than life, but their lack of actual time in the book hurts them. They turn out to be rather mediocre I think. Actions speak louder than words, and words were just not enough in this case.Now I know that Bond will come to realize how dangerous they can be, but by that time it will be too late for we readers: Fleming has already brainwashed us that they are small time and not that dangerous and compared to his previous villains they aren't.
Once again, right on target. The thing is I think, perhaps Fleming knew his villains like Mr. Big or Hugo Drax already were outstanding and above all else that he fewlt he didn't need to use too many words to build them up.
Maybe he just didn't have enough confidence in the Spang brothers.
#5
Posted 16 July 2004 - 01:31 AM
#6
Posted 16 July 2004 - 01:32 AM
I wouldn't say anticlimactic judging from the last chapter. But that train well...yeah, (to not let any spoilers out) IMOYes, the book's villians are really weak. I found the book anti-climatic.
#7
Posted 17 July 2004 - 08:36 AM
The villains in this book are certainly the weakest, but I guess its not compulsory to have great villains. Compared to Tiffany Case many of the Bond girls could be considered the same way.