
Did Mankiewicz do a good or bad deed?
#1
Posted 06 July 2004 - 04:58 AM
Was there more he could have taken from the book's storyline to have kept the film more similar? Was the film better because of the reason that it was different from the book? Thoughts?
#2
Posted 06 July 2004 - 08:09 PM
#3
Posted 06 July 2004 - 09:21 PM
I'm with you. I think more could have actually been done to prevent the diamond plots from being so dramatically different.I like the film and the book and was a little disappointed that were so different.
#4
Posted 07 July 2004 - 12:48 AM
#5
Posted 07 July 2004 - 12:53 AM
#6
Posted 07 July 2004 - 01:23 AM
Oh no, not at all.Yeah, it's not all Mankiewicz's responsibility.

I've just used his name, as he was the screenwriter you associate with Diamonds Are Forever.
#7
Posted 08 July 2004 - 08:54 PM
#8
Posted 09 July 2004 - 01:47 AM
True, while Diamonds Are Forever didn't offer the best when it came to villains, I guess I just would have liked to see something morew similar.I think they did fine with what was included in the film version of DAF. The mudbath was given a nod at the beginning where Blofeld was being cloned. As for the Spang Brothers, they were pretty much just hoodlums and not that exciting to being with. And the ghost town thing sounded like something out of The Man From UNCLE or something.
#9
Posted 13 July 2004 - 06:07 PM
The Scorpion in the 1st chapter;
Peter Franks;
Tiffany first meeting Bond in her underwear;
Wint & Kidd on the plane shadowing Bond and Tiffany;
The Spang Brothers are twins whcih may have been (at least partiallly) the inspiration for Blofeld's look-alikes,
and here's one for you:
"The custom's officer, a paunchy good-living man with dark sweat marks at the armpits of his grey uniform shirt..."
Tell me that isn't the charisma-less Norman Burton's Felix Leiter to a Tee?
#10
Posted 13 July 2004 - 06:39 PM
#11
Posted 13 July 2004 - 06:43 PM
Hmm, I would think it all came from Cubby's "Dream." I do see what you mean though, never thought of it that way.The Spang Brothers are twins whcih may have been (at least partiallly) the inspiration for Blofeld's look-alikes,
#12
Posted 13 July 2004 - 07:09 PM
#13
Posted 13 July 2004 - 07:11 PM
If Fleming had actually done more than just making them out to be intensely dangerous, but never, or rarely showing exactly how, they would have made much better contenders for villains to go into the film.I al;ways thought the Spang brothers belonged more in a Mike Hammer story than a Bond story. I'm frankly glad that so little was used from the book as I view it as one of the weakest of Flemings work.
#14
Posted 14 July 2004 - 06:54 PM
You mnetion Cubbies dream for the inspiration of the Blofeld look-alikes. (Sorry I can't figure out how to copy what you said directly and place it here so I must paraphrase.)
Anyway, I thought the same thing as well, but Cubbies dream was that he went to see Howard Hughs and someone else had taken his place, which is what is done with Willard Whyte in the film. I don't think there was anything in Cubbies dream about look-alikes. They say it came from the discarded idea that Lazenby woudl be Connery after plastic surgery.
I thik that the twin Spangs may have somehow, maybe even subconsciously influenced Mankewicz.
B007GLE
#15
Posted 14 July 2004 - 06:55 PM
That's also a very different way at looking at it.Qwerty,
You mnetion Cubbies dream for the inspiration of the Blofeld look-alikes. (Sorry I can't figure out how to copy what you said directly and place it here so I must paraphrase.)
And BTw, you can just click "Quote" on my post for easier copying.
#16
Posted 14 July 2004 - 07:08 PM
Did I do that correctly?
#17
Posted 14 July 2004 - 07:09 PM
#18
Posted 14 July 2004 - 07:24 PM
[Hmm, just lick the word "Quote" on my post, and then you can type a message along with that you quoted from me.
I think this may have worked.
Qwerty, thanks for your patience and assitance, my brother in Bond.
B007GLE
#19
Posted 14 July 2004 - 07:26 PM

Not a problem.
#20
Posted 14 July 2004 - 09:33 PM
#21
Posted 19 July 2004 - 07:11 PM
"Bond braced himself as the tyres screamed and the car lurched on two wheels and tehn righted itself and stopped."
Could this be the inspiration for the two-wheeled alleyway drive?
It seems that Mankiewicz took lots of littel things from Fleming to make his own story.
#22
Posted 19 July 2004 - 07:14 PM

I was wondered why the took away the, I suppose it can be called, the villainous marking on Wint of his wart that he always sucked on. A bit disturbing and odd, but then they often seemed fond of that distinguishing mark on the villains. (Blofeld's scar, Scaramanga's third nipple, Teehee's claw, etc.)
#23
Posted 19 July 2004 - 08:16 PM
Quick question: Did you notice that the two gansters following Bond and Cureo in the Jaguar are referred to as "pansy's" which made me think at first they were Wint and Kidd, but they were two other guys.
What is the deal with the Spangled Mob anyway?
#24
Posted 19 July 2004 - 08:20 PM
True, such a odd, but good henchman.Putter Smith was odd looking enough probably without the wart.
What is the deal with the Spangled Mob anyway?
The Spangled Mob, and Wint and Kidd in the book? Not too much to say about them. Rather bland, but they might have been better if they could have made a transfer which highlighted it in the movie.
#25
Posted 20 July 2004 - 04:47 PM
It is so good that the cartoon "Codename Kids Next Door" parodied it recently. I think my 8 year old may have beenthe only kid in America who got the joke.
#26
Posted 20 July 2004 - 06:59 PM
Definitely agreed. Two of the most disturbing people you'll ever see in a Bond film. Far more effective than other characters. Wint's overbearing control, and Kidd's just odd looking character make them work. And of course the lines for the other to finish.The key to Wint and Kidd in the movie is that very creepy way they talk to each other and finish each other's sentences.
It is so good that the cartoon "Codename Kids Next Door" parodied it recently. I think my 8 year old may have beenthe only kid in America who got the joke.

Don't believe I've seen that cartoon.