Not from me - I loved DIE ANOTHER DAY the first time out.There's an awful lot of revisionism going on here

Posted 20 July 2004 - 06:06 PM
Not from me - I loved DIE ANOTHER DAY the first time out.There's an awful lot of revisionism going on here
Posted 20 July 2004 - 07:25 PM
Nor too much here. Upon first seeing the film, and then the second, third, however many times in the theatre, I felt it was best to wait until it was on DVD to see how I could fairly and completely rate it. Usually when seeing a Bond film in theatres for the first time, it can come off (untruthfully) as the very best. Seeing it on DVD, it's a strong, good film, but one that has flaws that are easy to ridicule and point out. Some of the dialogue, parts of the finale aboard the Antonov plane.Not from me - I loved DIE ANOTHER DAY the first time out.There's an awful lot of revisionism going on here
![]()
Posted 20 July 2004 - 07:37 PM
Or - just as untruthfully - as the very worst. I hated TOMORROW NEVER DIES when I first saw it at the cinema. I thought it was boring and embarrassing, as did the friends I saw it with. Out of what might be termed "Bond fan duty", I went to see it again a couple of nights later, with a different group, and.... we all loved it - go figure.Usually when seeing a Bond film in theatres for the first time, it can come off (untruthfully) as the very best.
Posted 20 July 2004 - 07:40 PM
One example of hatred at first sight you might say then.OTOH, I hated THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH on first viewing, and have hated it ever since.
Posted 21 July 2004 - 03:02 AM
Have to disagree Pamela. To me it's not a bad or magnificent, but a good Bond film. So I think I fit your description. Really not all that bad at all.But I honestly think that anyone who finds it to be a fine Bond film and a pleasure to watch is under some kind of Bond spell.
Posted 21 July 2004 - 03:35 AM
Posted 21 July 2004 - 03:39 AM
Posted 21 July 2004 - 03:55 AM
Posted 21 July 2004 - 03:58 AM
Posted 21 July 2004 - 05:40 PM
Posted 21 July 2004 - 05:42 PM
Posted 21 July 2004 - 10:35 PM
Posted 22 July 2004 - 01:44 AM
Posted 22 July 2004 - 01:49 AM
Posted 22 July 2004 - 05:00 AM
Posted 22 July 2004 - 05:24 AM
I'd think MI6's over abundance in the film might be more suitable. IMHO of course. The CGI speaks for itself. Can't see a thing wrong with Frost though.HATE WITH A PASSION AND REFUSE TO WATCH AGAIN, LET ALONE OWN THIS TERD:80%
Miranda frost
MI6's incompetence(again!)
CGI abuse: Surfing, those mimi-glider thingys,The car,groan
Dialogue
Posted 22 July 2004 - 08:45 PM
Posted 22 July 2004 - 08:50 PM
While I'm kind of partial to liking all the Bond films. Threads like these make me want to watch them again and actually try to see the contrary. What is so horrible about certain films to certain Bond fans.The thing I like about a thread like this, whether it's somebody giving a positive view of DAD, DAF or AVTAK for example, is if well written it can spark good discussion and maybe even make me want to look at said film in a different light.
Posted 22 July 2004 - 09:26 PM
Posted 22 July 2004 - 10:42 PM
Posted 24 July 2004 - 12:14 AM
Has all the exhiliration of a solid hour's vomiting
I vomited so hard a bowling ball came out.
Posted 24 July 2004 - 05:34 AM
Posted 17 October 2004 - 07:49 PM
Posted 17 October 2004 - 08:42 PM
Posted 17 October 2004 - 09:23 PM
Posted 02 November 2004 - 04:50 AM
Posted 02 November 2004 - 05:55 AM