It says I already voted, but it's fine, I guess it really doesn't matter much that it is included in the poll.
What was Ken Adam's best 007 set?
#31
Posted 17 April 2004 - 08:49 PM
It says I already voted, but it's fine, I guess it really doesn't matter much that it is included in the poll.
#32
Posted 17 April 2004 - 08:51 PM
#33
Posted 17 April 2004 - 08:54 PM
Sorry.
-- Xen
#34
Posted 17 April 2004 - 08:56 PM
#35
Posted 14 August 2006 - 11:50 AM
#36
Posted 14 August 2006 - 12:02 PM
Do I really have to choose?
#37
Posted 14 August 2006 - 07:14 PM
#38
Posted 14 August 2006 - 07:38 PM
A Bond film without Ken Adam's contribution isn't really a proper Bond film.
From Russia With Love not a proper Bond film...?
Seriously, the volcano in You Only Live Twice for me. It hadn't been done before. It hasn't been bettered since.
#39
Posted 14 August 2006 - 09:01 PM
#40
Posted 14 August 2006 - 09:09 PM
Like John Barry, Ken Adam made an enduring contribution much greater than the sum of its parts to the Bond series. While Barry defined how a Bond film should sound, Adam defined how a Bond film should look.
Adam arguably made a huge impact on popular culture, giving birth to the notion of supervillains sitting around in elaborate, ultramodern lairs (often in odd locations such as volcanoes or beneath the sea) boasting the most improbably gorgeous interior design. Just look at an AUSTIN POWERS film to spot Adam's lasting influence.
I completely agree with the first statement.
There had to be the best of the best to create the biggest cinematic legend (Brocolli, Saltzman, Young, Adam, Barry, Connery, Bassey, Hunt, etc.). We take it for granted now, but it must have been one of those rare occassions that everything seemed to be exactly as they should be.
He didn't actually give birth to this notion you are referring to, but he did make it hugely popular, so, in principle I agree with the second statement as well.
Although I don' want to sound obsessed with the idea, repeating it over and over again, Ken Adam was German, and he was deeply influenced by the movement of expressionism; hence the slanted surfaces (you can see this type of supervillains in films of the 20s and 30s). He was influenced and he influenced a lot of other architects, like the one whose name I can't remember right now, and who designed the house of Whyte in DAF.
BTW, I voted for Fort Knox
#41
Posted 15 August 2006 - 01:44 AM
#42
Posted 15 August 2006 - 08:43 AM
But if you put a gun to my head, I will say that the best set was the volcano lair in YOLT with the best overall production design being in TSWLM.
I was going to say something similar to pgram above about how fortunate the Bond series was in having such great and talented people working on the films from the get go, people who influenced the series--and cinema--for years to come (and still are). Just look at the roster:
Producers: Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman
Director: Terence Young
Screenwriter: Richard Maibaum
Production Designer: Ken Adam
Cinematography/Director Of Photography: Ted Moore
Music: John Barry
Main Titles: Maurice Binder
Special Effects: John Stears
Stunts: Bob Simmons
Star: Sean Connery
How EON got all these talented people together all at one time is mind-boggling--and they were in most or virtually all of the 1960s Bond films. Is it any wonder the films succeeded? Interestingly, and perhaps not coincidentally, all those mentioned above were only all together for one film--Thunderball--the biggest and, adjusted for inflation, highest grossing 007 film of all time.
#43
Posted 15 August 2006 - 10:57 AM
Frank Loyd Wright desgined the desert house that Whyte is kept in, God I want that place it's so cool in a 60's playboy pad kinda way...
No, it wasn't FLW. Sorry, I still can't remember the name. But he belonged to same architecture movement with FLW.
I completely agree about its coolness.
#44
Posted 15 August 2006 - 11:07 AM
#45
Posted 15 August 2006 - 02:02 PM
The house where W. Whyte was held captive is the Elrod house by John Lautner.
I once read in a book about Adam that the moment where DN stops to be an average spy flick and starts to show Bond's world as a world of its own could exactly be determined: The 34th minute where Prof. Dent enters the "spider room".
Of course, as said above, nobody can ignore that there were several other ingredients that formed the cinematic Bond myth (Connery, Young, Barry,
#46
Posted 15 August 2006 - 02:07 PM
#47
Posted 13 March 2007 - 04:26 AM
#48
Posted 13 March 2007 - 05:13 AM
#49
Posted 13 March 2007 - 06:37 AM
Believe me to a 7 year old the Volcano set was simply mind-blowing. As someone else said all of YOLT is visually stunning. Every room Bond walks into is huge. Osato's office being another great set. It may not be all round the best Bond, but it is certainly the best looking. What with Adam's sets and Freddie Young's cinematography (the man who shot LAWRENCE OF ARABIA, the best looking film ever!) it has sheen and a beauty no Bond has ever come close to. Genius was at work on those early Bond's.
Edited by MarkA, 13 March 2007 - 06:39 AM.
#50
Posted 13 March 2007 - 10:53 AM
#51
Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:07 PM
Edited by MarkA, 13 March 2007 - 02:07 PM.
#52
Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:11 PM
Totally agreePoint taken, but I'm not sure Ken Adam had such total control. Remember first and foremost Bond movies are producers movies. Also William Cameron Menzies storyboarded Gone With The Wind. Adam as far as I know never did, on any film he worked on. Remember William Cameron Menzies was also a director.
I was just pointing out the work of a production designer is more than just building and designing sets. I don't think anyone on any film has total control - film-making is such a collaborative artform.
#53
Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:46 PM
#54
Posted 13 March 2007 - 07:34 PM

