
On Her Majesty's Secret Service: Spectacular?
#31
Posted 01 May 2004 - 03:55 PM
#32
Posted 01 May 2004 - 09:27 PM
I'm pretty sure you're right, Chandler.I thought it was Chi Chi, the guy who takes a pummeling from Lazenby in his motel room.
#33
Posted 15 May 2004 - 06:18 AM
#34
Posted 15 May 2004 - 06:40 AM
1. The cinematography is great, but, the style of the film seems outdated and tacky (The purple, the ruffled shirts, Tracy's ski outfit...) I also didn't like the quick-cut action sequences. I would have preferred to have just seen the fights straight-on.
2. Telly Savalas didn't really do it for me as Blofeld. Even though he's a great actor, he was truly mis-cast. He does seem like a gangster type, and is more hands-on than all of the other Blofelds. For me, Vincent Price would have made a great Blofeld in this film, provided a few changes. Also, Blofeld throwing down his cat and pursuing Bond on ski's seems too un-villain like, for any Bond film. Why would Blofeld stoop so low.
3. George Lazenby seems too young for the role, considering those around him. Moneypenny is clearly older than he is. He also can't act very well in the first half. That comment about the caviar in his Tracy's hotel room is so dry, that it makes me want to scream. In the second half though, he really picks up, and starts to form his own character, and not to to do a "by the book" Bond.
4. Blofeld's plot is rather mundane. A pardon and Title? This is Ernst Blofeld here! Even though he's clearly insane, why would he want a title, of all things, if he was one of the worlds most wanted criminals. It's not like he'd be making any speeches, or cutting ribbons in public any time soon. He may be a psychotic, but he's certainly a genius. "The distance between genius and insanity, is measured only by success."
Other than that, the film is great, one of my favorites to watch on a rainy day.
9.5/10
#35
Posted 29 May 2004 - 11:07 PM
#36
Posted 29 May 2004 - 11:32 PM
The film overall though truly is excellent.
#37
Posted 30 May 2004 - 08:13 PM
The fight scenes and the way that they are edited and sped up makes them look more like cartoons to me. I half expect Batman and Robin to join in BIFF! BAM! KABOOM! It makes no sense to me, especially when you consider that George Lazenby was hired to play the role of James Bond mainly because of his ability in fight scenes.Well yes, I can never make up my mind on whether I like that fight scene editting or not, it just depends I suppose. Sometimes it seems like too much of a visual overload on the eyes.
#38
Posted 31 May 2004 - 04:01 AM
I think Hunt was trying to really make it an interesting sequence, and his editting could be quite fantastic. But, I don't think he pulled it off with this scene.The fight scenes and the way that they are edited and sped up makes them look more like cartoons to me. I half expect Batman and Robin to join in BIFF! BAM! KABOOM! It makes no sense to me, especially when you consider that George Lazenby was hired to play the role of James Bond mainly because of his ability in fight scenes.Well yes, I can never make up my mind on whether I like that fight scene editting or not, it just depends I suppose. Sometimes it seems like too much of a visual overload on the eyes.
#39
Posted 31 May 2004 - 05:09 PM
In my previous post I forgot to mention about the weird sound effects that accompany the sped up fight scenes in OHMSS which significantly contribute to their cartoon like nature.I think Hunt was trying to really make it an interesting sequence, and his editting could be quite fantastic. But, I don't think he pulled it off with this scene.
I don't doubt that Peter Hunt was trying to make those fight scenes more interesting, but unfortunately he got it all wrong. However, when he got it right his editing was indeed quite fantastic.
#40
Posted 31 May 2004 - 05:19 PM
Oh yes, I think I know of the ones you speak of.In my previous post I forgot to mention about the weird sound effects that accompany the sped up fight scenes in OHMSS which significantly contribute to their cartoon like nature.I think Hunt was trying to really make it an interesting sequence, and his editting could be quite fantastic. But, I don't think he pulled it off with this scene.
#41
Posted 02 June 2004 - 12:33 PM
The movie was great, the story was excellent and it was done splendidly. Unfiortunately, I didn't care for the actor and this was the reason why I didn't watch it as many times as perhaps should have.
#42
Posted 02 June 2004 - 07:00 PM
I've often thought that too and wondered if Connery could have really done it. I've accepted Lazrnby, and he does fine. Connery would have been interesting to see though, no doubt there.I think that OHMSS was the most important movie in the series, and it was a shame that Sean Connery refused to play Bond in it. I think this film would have shown his acting ability and would have been a perfect ending to his rein as James Bond. I don't understand why he took a different route.
#43
Posted 02 June 2004 - 07:57 PM
It is all a matter of timing. The Sean Connery of the first four Bond films would have been just fine in OHMSS, certainly a lot better than George Lazenby. But the non performing Sean Connery of YOLT would have been worse than George Lazenby.I've often thought that too and wondered if Connery could have really done it. I've accepted Lazrnby, and he does fine. Connery would have been interesting to see though, no doubt there.
#44
Posted 02 June 2004 - 08:04 PM
#45
Posted 03 June 2004 - 06:10 PM



#46
Posted 03 June 2004 - 06:12 PM
Well I do like, there isn't a Bond film that I hate. I consider it one of Connery's lesser Bond films, but still very enjoyable nonetheless. Sometimes my opinion changes on it occasionally.Hi, Qwerty and Moore Not Less! You didn't like YOLT? I thought most fans consider it one of Sean's best.

Overall a fine film.
#47
Posted 03 June 2004 - 07:59 PM
Hello, SimplyMoore. I do like You Only Live Twice and I do consider it one of Sean Connery's best Bond films despite his performance, or should I say non performance. My favourite Connery films are Goldfinger, From Russia With Love and then You Only Live Twice.Hi, Qwerty and Moore Not Less! You didn't like YOLT? I thought most fans consider it one of Sean's best.
The best highlight of YOLT is John Barry's absolutely superb score.

Edited by Moore Not Less, 03 June 2004 - 08:01 PM.
#48
Posted 04 June 2004 - 05:24 PM
That brings me to my next question, what do you think about OHMSS title song?
I am going to watch YOLT again and pay better attention to Sean's performance. Strangest thing how SC wanted so desperately to get out of playing James Bond and yet later on insisted on returning to the role in Never Say Never Again.

#49
Posted 04 June 2004 - 07:14 PM
Well that can be attributed to his wife's support and him being away from the role so long.That brings me to my next question, what do you think about OHMSS title song?
I am going to watch YOLT again and pay better attention to Sean's performance. Strangest thing how SC wanted so desperately to get out of playing James Bond and yet later on insisted on returning to the role in Never Say Never Again.
Regarding the title song for On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, I love that "killer tune" as David Arnold describes it. Always excellent.
#50
Posted 04 June 2004 - 07:34 PM
#51
Posted 04 June 2004 - 09:08 PM
#52
Posted 05 June 2004 - 01:18 AM
#53
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:21 AM
I've always wondered that if they took a chance and went with a strong instrumental title song, if it'd work. The odd thing would be though that they'd probably want a song with lyrics to promote the film.Sadly, they don't make them like that anymore.
Certainly worked for On Her Majesty’s Secret Service though.
#54
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:30 AM
Could you imagine them trying that in this day and age? It really shows they were more interested in promoting the film than the product around it. But you could get away with it 35 years ago.I've always wondered that if they took a chance and went with a strong instrumental title song, if it'd work. The odd thing would be though that they'd probably want a song with lyrics to promote the film.Sadly, they don't make them like that anymore.
Certainly worked for On Her Majesty’s Secret Service though.
It's just too valuable to have a popular artist associated with your product.
#55
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:34 AM
Exactly, it'd be very cool, and rather surprising if they considered that now.But you could get away with it 35 years ago.
#56
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:40 AM

#57
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:48 AM
#58
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:50 AM
You then pity me.So, in other words, yes I agree OHMSS was spectacular. I pity anyone who says that Lazneby was the worst James Bond.
Of all the official Bond's, he's my least favorite. The film is spectacular to me, but he's just my least favorite of them all.
#59
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:55 AM
I don't pity those who least prefer Lazenby, I pity those who say he's the worst Bond actor of them all. Maybe that's your opinion, but still, I don't pity you.
I'm just too nice, aren't I?

#60
Posted 05 June 2004 - 02:59 AM
But basically I'm saying he is in my opinion the worst Bond if he's my least favorite, yes?Nah, I don't pity you, Qwerty.
I don't pity those who least prefer Lazenby, I pity those who say he's the worst Bond actor of them all. Maybe that's your opinion, but still, I don't pity you.
I'm just too nice, aren't I?