Was "tmwtgg" All Fleming's Own's Work?
#1
Posted 06 January 2004 - 03:38 PM
#2
Posted 06 January 2004 - 04:23 PM
#3
Posted 06 January 2004 - 05:41 PM
#4
Posted 06 January 2004 - 05:55 PM
#5
Posted 06 January 2004 - 05:56 PM
#6
Posted 06 January 2004 - 05:59 PM
Good point.In all but that last point I believe him. If Amis had done the final draft then I would have expected TMWTGG to be more polished than it actually is.
Maybe it was Geoffrey (Per Fine Ounce) Jenkins?
#7
Posted 06 January 2004 - 06:00 PM
I'll have to knock my Amis fantasies on the head.
#8
Posted 07 January 2004 - 01:35 AM
I used to think when I was younger that it was perhaps Amis or unnamed editors, thanks for the name of the one Zencat. I never knew his name.
#9
Posted 10 April 2004 - 01:24 AM
I could be dead wrong, but that is the way it seems to me.
#10
Posted 10 April 2004 - 08:13 AM
I agree that if Amis had had a go at TMWTGG, then I would expect it to be more developed and less empty feeling than it is. As to whether the book as published is all Fleming's work, or someone else "finished" it, I've always wanted a definitive answer. But apparently none is forthcoming.
Fleming's last great mystery, I suppose.
#11
Posted 10 April 2004 - 10:52 AM
Which is not only frustrating, but very strange after all these years.As to whether the book as published is all Fleming's work, or someone else "finished" it, I've always wanted a definitive answer. But apparently none is forthcoming.
#12
Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:01 PM
Yes, or they could be someone else's attempt at the Fleming touch. It has always bothered be to know if this was real Fleming, or what parts of the novel was someone else's writing.Certain parts of it seem very Flemingesque to me, e.g., the chapter titles "Ballcock, and Other Trouble," "3 1/2 Love Lane," and "Endit." Portions of the narrative, especially in the earlier parts of the book seem to have that Fleming touch (I don't have a copy of the book in front of me from which to quote). But there are many areas that feel very un-Fleming.
#13
Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:03 PM
#14
Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:55 PM
#15
Posted 10 April 2004 - 04:25 PM
I don't think we'll ever be told the complete story.I always though it was Amis and fleming's editor, an interesting piece of trivia...perhaps one day we might get an answer from one of the parties involved? *yeah right*
#16
Posted 10 April 2004 - 09:35 PM
#17
Posted 10 April 2004 - 10:19 PM
#18
Posted 12 April 2004 - 12:53 PM
May be someone at GP did some final writings but I thing Amis would have tell it if it was him.
#19
Posted 02 May 2004 - 02:01 PM
4A