'The Critique of Pure Bond'
#1
Posted 04 December 2003 - 08:00 PM
The first is Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero by Tony Bennett and Janet Woollacott. Written in 1987, it focuses on the Bond phenomenon and its influence on politics (in the broad sense of the word).
The other is The Devil with James Bond! by Ann S. Boyd. Written in 1967, it focuses on the moral aspects of our hero (it is based on an article called 'James Bond: Modern-day Dragon-slayer' by the same author). It refers to the 'Good vs Evil' bit in CR, and Mr Big's mention of 'accide' in LALD, for instance.
PS. Do you think anyone will ever write a Critique of Pure Bond, and attempt to save the series as Kant attempted to save metaphysics?
PPS. Yes. I just finished my philosophy term paper.
#2
Posted 04 December 2003 - 08:49 PM
'The Least Of All Evils'
It examined James Bond's behavior from a moral point of view.
On the one hand, He (the Fleming Bond) was an adulterer. I forget the exact count but from my recollection he engaged in sexual activity with three married women.
In addition, he was a substance abuser. Using benzadrine, for example, to keep awake/stay sharp.
Further, he was a killer. He may not have 'liked' killing (a MooreBond trait) but if killing HAD to be done, he took comfort in the fact that he killed people who, let's say, deserved to die.
In spite of his 'sinning ways', he was a man of honor who defended the innocent and destroyed evil.
I finished off the paper by refering to him as a "Dark Angel". or was it "Dark Knight" (Often a title used for Batman...although I wrote the paper prior to 1989 and was not familiar with said title for said 'super-hero'). I forget. But the point remains the same.
#3
Posted 04 December 2003 - 11:59 PM
Originally posted by General Koskov
The first is Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero by Tony Bennett and Janet Woollacott. Written in 1987, it focuses on the Bond phenomenon and its influence on politics (in the broad sense of the word).
My textbook for one of my University subjects looked at this particular book. Apparently, it completely redefined the way people analyse texts.
I'd love to read an actual copy of the book.
#4
Posted 05 December 2003 - 05:01 AM
Originally posted by [dark]
My textbook for one of my University subjects looked at this particular book. Apparently, it completely redefined the way people analyse texts.
I'd love to read an actual copy of the book.
I'm fairly certain the Gold Coast Library has a copy, i seem to recall reading it a few years ago.
#5
Posted 05 December 2003 - 05:13 AM
#6
Posted 05 December 2003 - 05:13 AM