Updated James Bond Poster Book
#1
Posted 09 October 2003 - 04:04 PM
#2
Posted 09 October 2003 - 04:28 PM
#3
Posted 09 October 2003 - 04:29 PM
#4
Posted 09 October 2003 - 04:31 PM
#5
Posted 09 October 2003 - 04:32 PM
#6
Posted 09 October 2003 - 04:34 PM
#7
Posted 09 October 2003 - 05:07 PM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I was not too thrilled with the marketing campaign for DAD
You know what? I think DAD has the best posters of the Brosnan era (runner-up: TOMORROW NEVER DIES). I don't really like the final release poster, but the teaser poster with the gun on the ice is very cool indeed (ho ho), and I love the Japanese posters, even though they look like artwork for computer games. I even like the (much-maligned, I think) posters with Brosnan and Berry pointing their guns against a blue background.
Overall, best artwork since LICENCE TO KILL, IMO, and certainly a vast improvement on the horribly boring posters for THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.
#8
Posted 09 October 2003 - 05:21 PM
Originally posted by Loomis
and certainly a vast improvement on the horribly boring posters for THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.
What movie??? That must have been one of the unofficial movies!!
Seriously the last 007 posters I really liked were the ones for The Living Daylights
#9
Posted 09 October 2003 - 05:31 PM
#10
Posted 09 October 2003 - 05:36 PM
#11
Posted 09 October 2003 - 05:47 PM
#12
Posted 09 October 2003 - 05:57 PM
Originally posted by zencat
I really liked the GOLDENEYE campaign. For me, that's the best of the Brosnan era.
I disagree. For me, GOLDENEYE has possibly the dullest campaign of any Bond movie. All its posters seem to look exactly the same. Nothing but boring head shots. And this was the best they could come up with after SIX YEARS?!?!
#13
Posted 09 October 2003 - 06:03 PM
#14
Posted 09 October 2003 - 06:33 PM
The US GoldenEye campaign didn't have a head shot appearance as that of the UK campaign.
Similarly, the UK TND campaign was just as flat as paper compared to the US campaign. The US excelled with this one, lots of deep reds, a splendidly dynamic style for the teaser poster, a full presentation for the main campaign. Meanwhile, back in the UK, it's head shots a go-go to "tease" us and erm, well, another head shot in front of some blue TVs for the main campaign - I really do not know how this got past the drawing board.
#15
Posted 09 October 2003 - 06:41 PM
#16
Posted 09 October 2003 - 06:44 PM
#17
Posted 09 October 2003 - 07:32 PM
Originally posted by Simon
Loomers, Zencat, I think you two maybe exhibiting the problems of discussing "a" campaign that had two very different manifestations across the water from each other. Correct me if I'm wrong.
You may be right, but I thought all the GOLDENEYE posters were to be found here: http://www.artofjame...m/goldeneye.htm. And, to be honest, I don't think any of them, British, American or otherwise, are up to much.
#18
Posted 09 October 2003 - 08:27 PM
I think the first one was something of a disappointment anyway. The unusued stuff was a nice plus, but there were lots of posters I've seen over the years that were nowhere to be seen. I thought this was the definitive collection but seemed far from it.
Where was the unusued campaign for LTK, for instance? It seems some of the newer films got shortchanged. Plus there have been numerous rereleases and double features that didn't make the book. I'm not knocking it, I just wasn't all it could have been.
#19
Posted 09 October 2003 - 08:48 PM
Incomplete, but still a GREAT collection of Bond posters!
March 20, 2002
Reviewer: John Cox from Marina del Rey, CA
At last a collection of James Bond posters! While I wouldn't say this book is complete in a check-list sort of way, I do think it's pretty darn impressive. This book owes much to a German publication released in 1997 called LICENSE TO THRILL. In fact, it uses many of the same images and utilized the same basic format. But at least with this book I can read the text (or what there is of it).
The best thing about the book is the concept art for OHMSS, DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER, and LIVE & LET DIE. The OHMSS concept art is worth the price of the book alone. It shows you not just variant posters, but a whole different approach to marketing the movie. The "007 and Bride" posters are wild and I think this would have made a great campaign. It certainly would have been the most daring and different campaign ever done for a Bond film and I think perfect for this very special movie. For those of you who love montage art, you've got to see the Thai OCTOPUSSY and NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN posters (too bad it doesn't have the Thai A VIEW TO A KILL which is in the German book).
The only disappointment (and this was true of the German book as well) is how little space is devoted to the later films, especially the Dalton films. Paramount is the fact that, even though they make reference to it in the text section for LICENCE TO KILL, there are no examples of the unused and vastly superior LICENCE REVOKED campaign by Robert Peak. This is a glaring omission! Also, where's the standard U.S. one-sheets for NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN and FOR YOUR EYES ONLY? Strange.
But aside from these points, I would say this book is a must for Bond fans, especially if you don't have the German book.
#20
Posted 09 October 2003 - 08:57 PM
#21
Posted 09 October 2003 - 10:44 PM
Originally posted by Turn
I've got to echo what Tanger said about this being pretty annoying that they would come out with an updated version of this book just a year after the initial one was released. There's no way I'd buy it a second time.
If you think about it, about the only books that aren't updated with every new film are the Making of books. I totally agree, this updating fad is playing completely into the arms of the Bond fans that have to have every version of every book, I guess if the market is there... But as to the other books that have been constantly updated, Rubin's Encyclopedia, Pfeiffer's Essential Bond (now entitled Essential James Bond, Rye's Bond Girls, Pfeiffer's other work - Incredible World..., The Bond Files, the list goes on. I'm sure your bookshelves could be filled with 80 versions of just 7 books.
I think the first one was something of a disappointment anyway. The unusued stuff was a nice plus, but there were lots of posters I've seen over the years that were nowhere to be seen. I thought this was the definitive collection but seemed far from it.
Totally agreed. It was a missed chance to do something really special and while it was nicely presented, to my mind it should have been more of a checklist of all posters, all unused art, all variants to arrive at the finished product, and to have had interviews with the various designers to find out how things progressed, what the influences were, the decision making process etc etc.
I found it a bit lazy and this is the one area where I believe a Bond fan could have done the better job - albeit a trained designer - indeed, the Red Grant chap over at Art of... would have been my suggestion.
#22
Posted 09 October 2003 - 11:43 PM
#23
Posted 10 October 2003 - 07:54 PM
Originally posted by Simon
If you think about it, about the only books that aren't updated with every new film are the Making of books. I totally agree, this updating fad is playing completely into the arms of the Bond fans that have to have every version of every book, I guess if the market is there... But as to the other books that have been constantly updated, Rubin's Encyclopedia, Pfeiffer's Essential Bond (now entitled Essential James Bond, Rye's Bond Girls, Pfeiffer's other work - Incredible World..., The Bond Files, the list goes on. I'm sure your bookshelves could be filled with 80 versions of just 7 books.
I do confess to buying updated copies of The Bond Files and Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. The former was very cheap and the latter I got for a really good price at a half-price book shop.
One that really gets me as far as updating is The James Bond Encyclopedia. The updated version boasts it has a new section for all the Brosnan films. Well and dandy, but Rubin didn't even bother to update any of the other sections from what I saw. Why bother to include new information on one subject if others are somewhat out of date?
#24
Posted 10 October 2003 - 09:14 PM
Is it really just artofjamesbond.com on paper?
Is there any DAD conceptual art in it that's worth looking at? I haven't seen any of the like so far that's really significant, and after seeing TWINE's concept art, I was intrigued as to how the DAD poster art (including the half-assed US DAD poster -sorry zen) evolved.
#25
Posted 10 October 2003 - 09:40 PM
Originally posted by Double-Oh-Zero
Is it really just artofjamesbond.com on paper?
I don't own the book (I've only flicked through it in a shop), but I'd have to say that, yes, essentially it really is just artofjamesbond.com on paper.... but nowhere near as good, and nothing like as comprehensive. I don't think there's much text of interest.
Originally posted by Double-Oh-Zero
Is there any DAD conceptual art in it that's worth looking at?
I don't think there's any DAD concept art at all.
#26
Posted 10 October 2003 - 09:53 PM
#27
Posted 11 October 2003 - 12:19 AM
A truly profound statement, Simon.Originally posted by Simon
If you think about it, about the only books that aren't updated with every new film are the Making of books.
Although, I wish Benson's Bedside Companion was updated on a regular basis.
This thread is quite fortuitous for as only last weekend I almost bought the book, but now I'll just wait for the updated one.
#28
Posted 17 October 2003 - 03:49 PM
#29
Posted 17 October 2003 - 03:53 PM
Originally posted by Blofeld's Cat
Although, I wish Benson's Bedside Companion was updated on a regular basis.
Agreed...
I also wish Steven Jay Rubin would update his "The James Bond Films: A Behind the Scenes History" book and that John Brosnan would give us his insight into the newer movies with an update of his "James Bond in the Cinema".