Which Gardner books would you recommend?
#1
Posted 17 September 2003 - 05:30 PM
I'd like to buy some of these, but I've heard that his books are hit and miss when it comes to quality. So I'd like your advice:
Firstly, which books would you recommend I buy?
Secondly, are there any I need to read to understand the plots of the others?
Finally, which is the best one to start with?
I was leaning towards Icebreaker after reading another topic here, but do I need to start with Licence Renewed?
Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated - Thanks!
#2
Posted 17 September 2003 - 05:33 PM
#3
Posted 17 September 2003 - 05:51 PM
#4
Posted 17 September 2003 - 06:04 PM
#5
Posted 17 September 2003 - 06:23 PM
#6
Posted 17 September 2003 - 06:37 PM
#7
Posted 17 September 2003 - 06:45 PM
#8
Posted 17 September 2003 - 07:12 PM
#9
Posted 26 September 2003 - 08:02 PM
If you've never read Gardner try to stay away from "barbarossa, Win lose or die and Cold Fall unless you've already read two or three of them...
For Special Services,
Ice breaker,
Nobody lives Forever,
those are my Favrites by him....
Personally i like Benson and fleming the best
#10
Posted 26 September 2003 - 08:18 PM
Originally posted by Tarl_Cabot
Icebreaker is the best Gardner; it should have been a '91 Dalton Bond film(with some changes).I liked Scorpious too. I agree with zen, go with the first 5...
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I love the Bond novel "Icebreaker"...I know it has been much maligned over the years but I think it is a cracking good read. I actually was so impressed with it when it came out that I wrote to Gardner and told him I didn't think anyone could write Bond as good as Fleming until I read "icebreaker"...I got a very nice letter back from him.
I'm reading "Icebreaker" at the moment (only my second Gardner, my first being "Licence Renewed", which I read a few weeks ago; I managed to pick up "Scorpius" at the same time as "Icebreaker" the other day, so I'll be tucking into that one next).
My verdict? Competent and enjoyable, but uninspired (so far anyway - I'm only up to the point where Bond meets the American, Israeli and Russian agents he'll be working with).
My biggest gripe is that Bond could just be any old generic pulp thriller action hero. He seems much more like an SAS officer or British special forces operative than Fleming's creation. Is this the same guy whose adventures we read about in "Casino Royale", "You Only Live Twice" and Amis' "Colonel Sun"? Clearly, the answer is: no. Still, "Icebreaker"'s a fun read.
#11
Posted 26 September 2003 - 08:46 PM
#12
Posted 01 November 2003 - 10:59 PM
#13
Posted 02 November 2003 - 12:48 AM
#15
Posted 02 November 2003 - 04:03 AM
#16
Posted 03 November 2003 - 02:45 AM
Lucky for me I gave Gardner a second chance a year later with Licence Renewed. I then read 'em all. Moral? Read Licence Renewed and follow in order.
#17
Posted 05 November 2003 - 05:31 AM
#18
Posted 05 November 2003 - 02:24 PM
Originally posted by IndyJones
THe only disappointing Gardner Bond books I have read are Role Of Honor and Brokenclaw.
Really? I loved "Role of Honor" and I also thought "No Deals Mr. Bond" was a great read (although a terrible title).
#19
Posted 05 November 2003 - 08:12 PM
Originally posted by IndyJones
I haveyet to read The Man From Barbarossa,
You're in for a trip with that one IndyJones, in my opinion, the worst of the entire literary series.
#20
Posted 05 November 2003 - 08:18 PM
#21
Posted 05 November 2003 - 08:34 PM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I agree Qwerty, although the worst Gardner is better than the best Benson, I happen to have a real problem with "The Man from Barbarossa".
Yes. Isn't a James Bond novel supposed to have some action and adventure??? That dud fails miserably, can't understand why Gardner likes it as much as he does.
#22
Posted 05 November 2003 - 09:03 PM
#23
Posted 06 November 2003 - 04:20 AM