Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I still think Grant would have made a more (immediately) financially successful "Casino Royale" than Connery's "Dr. No"...
Wasn't "Dr. No" also released late in 1962, if there had been a Cary Grant "CR" released first, would this have affected DN's take
but didnt much of the 'exitement' caused by Dr. No result out of things like:
The James Bond Theme
The Ken Adam Sets
The idea of the hero having sex with THREE women
The ideas of cold brutal violence meted out by the 'hero'
The science-fantasy plotline of disorienting the US Space Program
Truly, these would have made a huge difference. A Casino Royale would have been an utter bore:
a singular location
a singular girl
a medeocre plot about busting a red at the gaming tables
Grant would never had participated in the types of sex and violence in the type of movie that Dr No became anyway
and whose to say that Terrence Young and Peter Hunt would have been part of the Casino Royale team
they would not have because they were Cubby's and Saltzman's men and C and S didnt have the rights to CR.
thank goodness we had connery, young, hunt, barry, adams et.al. on the Eon team