

Keira Knightley Apparantly in Talks to Star
#31
Posted 27 August 2003 - 04:18 PM

#32
Posted 27 August 2003 - 04:19 PM
Now who wants a bite of my strawberry?"
http://forums.comman...=&postid=150651
#33
Posted 28 August 2003 - 03:16 AM
#34
Posted 28 August 2003 - 03:20 AM

#35
Posted 28 August 2003 - 03:43 AM
Anyway now that I have a pictoral reference I think she could do well as a Bond girl. I doubt very much that they will choose her for Bond 21 but I think she would be great in upcoming years. She was pretty good in Pirates of the Caribbean, too.
#36
Posted 28 August 2003 - 02:25 PM
And that's bad...why?Originally posted by Tarl_Cabot
Dude, she looks 17 in this pic...

Actually, this pic is from the Sept '03 Empire magazine so we're safe. She turned 18 in March (oh my God, she's an Aries!). Maybe too young for Bond, but for zencat...
*zencat closes eyes and rubs temple*
"The madness begins."
#37
Posted 28 August 2003 - 02:30 PM

#38
Posted 28 August 2003 - 03:32 PM
Originally posted by zencat
Actually, this pic is from the Sept '03 Empire magazine so we're safe. She turned 18 in March (oh my God, she's an Aries!). Maybe too young for Bond, but for zencat...
*zencat closes eyes and rubs temple*
"The madness begins."
What exactly do you mean by 'temple'?

#39
Posted 28 August 2003 - 05:33 PM
Originally posted by Tarl_Cabot
Hey, she has the arched eyebrows...she *really* does look like she could be a child pf 007! God knows 007 got around!!!![]()
It's called tweezing, sweetie. Makes the eyes look bigger and transforms the face.
Then again, Bond was quite the man-ho. Never know....
#40
Posted 28 August 2003 - 08:46 PM
I have arched eyebrows and I don't 'tweeze'.

#41
Posted 28 August 2003 - 08:50 PM
#42
Posted 28 August 2003 - 09:14 PM
#43
Posted 28 August 2003 - 09:22 PM
As for her as a Bond girl, it would be alright if she wasn't the main Bond girl, maybe Moneypenny's neice or something. She shouldn't be the sex object of Bond, definantly to young.
#44
Posted 29 August 2003 - 02:39 AM
#45
Posted 29 August 2003 - 02:55 AM
Originally posted by Blue Eyes
Keira Knightley is, in a word, yum. There are a lot more words suitable though.
You are correct on both points.
#46
Posted 29 August 2003 - 03:00 AM
Originally posted by Blue Eyes
There are a lot more words suitable though.
But not suitable for the boards, right?

#47
Posted 29 August 2003 - 04:18 AM
Originally posted by Loomis
It's all about suspension of disbelief, though. Was Moore really all that fantastically stunning? Especially in the likes of OCTOPUSSY and A VIEW TO A KILL? Personally, I feel he looks so old, raddled and out-of-shape in those films that you wonder whether he's even capable of getting it up, never mind pulling any woman on earth.
At least in Octopussy, the producers had the sense to cast "older" actresses to play Bond girls(women). At least that may the romance/seduction more palatable.
The Stacy Sutton character in AVTAK was older but she was the true damsel- waiting for Bond to save her at every turn.
We had a discussion tonight about the dearth of "older" actresses in contemporary cinema. I know Hollywood has a penchant for casting the new PYT(pretty young thang) but I'm tired of casting being determined by the Maxim set.
#48
Posted 29 August 2003 - 10:54 AM
#49
Posted 29 August 2003 - 12:51 PM
And you don't have to force her being into an unbelievable role like nuclear scientist.

#51
Posted 30 August 2003 - 03:08 AM
What a surprise.Originally posted by [dark]
According to Dark Horizons, her agents have dismissed the rumour.

#52
Posted 30 August 2003 - 11:19 AM
I bet they jumped fences to rush the denial out.Originally posted by [dark]
According to Dark Horizons, her agents have dismissed the rumour.

#53
Posted 20 May 2004 - 02:27 PM
#54
Posted 23 May 2004 - 02:26 AM
She has ability, as she proved in Doctor Zhivago, and she's poised to become a big star. So again, I think they should let her stew a bit.
She's one of the most beautiful young celebs out there, though. She'd be a great Bond girl--in time. And given the fact that she works without an agent and takes real care in choosing parts on her own, I think she'll see that this isn't the right time for her to venture into Bond either.
And oh yeah...she's not too young for me. I have a mere five month advantage on her. But I doubt she'd go for a young archaeology student



Edited by Adrian Carlisle, 23 May 2004 - 02:31 AM.
#55
Posted 23 May 2004 - 03:54 AM

Oh, it's 85' btw

Attached Files
#56
Posted 23 May 2004 - 03:55 AM


#57
Posted 23 May 2004 - 04:09 AM

#58
Posted 25 May 2004 - 06:58 AM
Attached Files
#59
Posted 25 May 2004 - 11:03 AM
Yes, that'd be a good way to describe her.Steaming my friend.
#60
Posted 25 May 2004 - 11:19 AM
