Sean Connery in ZARDOZ
#1
Posted 13 August 2003 - 01:31 PM
#2
Posted 13 August 2003 - 01:32 PM
#3
Posted 13 August 2003 - 01:39 PM
#4
Posted 13 August 2003 - 01:41 PM
Not that this makes it any clearer, mind
#5
Posted 13 August 2003 - 02:01 PM
Well, that and the gratuitous nudity.
#6
Posted 13 August 2003 - 07:57 PM
Here's how I interpret it. I lent it to a friend-of-a-friend once who called it one of the greatest things he'd ever seen. This guy is supposedly a borderline genius who never did anything with his life, held various jobs at pallet companies and pizza delivery places, did little else but take drugs and drink and is near death from it last I heard.
Maybe it was the diaper thing or he had the right mindset at the time.
#7
Posted 13 August 2003 - 08:06 PM
#8
Posted 13 August 2003 - 10:48 PM
#9
Posted 13 August 2003 - 11:40 PM
If ever there was a movie for Connery to break out of his Bond image, this was certainly the one. Burt Reynolds was apparently the first choice for the role.
#10
Posted 13 August 2003 - 11:58 PM
#11
Posted 02 September 2003 - 12:05 AM
Film producers and studio big wigs probably liked the theme because science fiction films could be made cheaply using existing costumes and sets with several layers of dirt and grime.
It's interesting to think that Sean Connery passed on doing Live and Let Die to make this film.
Could you imagine what John Boorman's pitch was to Sean Connery to get him to play Zed. You will have long hair and a beard and run around in a red loin cloth with bandoliero weapon slings across your chest running around killing people with a revolver.
Talk about shattering the James Bond image.
#12
Posted 02 September 2003 - 07:57 PM
Originally posted by Phuyuck '74
Hmmmm. I'm trying to picture Zed driving a Trans Am through Texarkana...
Now I'd pay to see that movie, damn it!
#13
Posted 02 September 2003 - 09:34 PM
BTW, Boorman originally wrote the role of Zed for Burt Reynolds but his career had taken off after the success of Deliverance and he wasn't available.Connery on the other hand was having a tough time finding post-Bond work.
#14
Posted 02 September 2003 - 09:36 PM
#15
Posted 03 September 2003 - 05:15 PM
Originally posted by Triton
It certainly is a very strange film. Funny how the dystopia theme was quite fashionable in science fiction films during the early 1970s. About the time that Zardoz was released, we got Gene Roddenberry's pilots for Planet Earth and Genesis II on television, which introduced a character named Dylan Hunt, and in the cinema there were films like Z.P.G. (Zero Population Growth), Silent Running, and Soylent Green. I guess that in the early 1970s some people expected that society and its institutions would collapse and future generations would live in a future where buildings and technology were decaying and knowledge was lost.
Film producers and studio big wigs probably liked the theme because science fiction films could be made cheaply using existing costumes and sets with several layers of dirt and grime.
It's interesting to think that Sean Connery passed on doing Live and Let Die to make this film.
Could you imagine what John Boorman's pitch was to Sean Connery to get him to play Zed. You will have long hair and a beard and run around in a red loin cloth with bandoliero weapon slings across your chest running around killing people with a revolver.
Talk about shattering the James Bond image.
Wow, someone on this board remembers Genesis II and Planet Earth, two of my guilty old pleasures!! All right, Triton!
Loved your whole post on 70s SF films. In the 80s when SF films became hot again it became a cliche among SF film fans to say that the 70s had been a dry spell, but there was more in that decade than people realized. You named a few. Of course there was also a lot of drek. But I loved Silent Running, Soylent Green, all the Planet of the Apes films (even the awful sequels), Gene Roddenberry's TV films The Questor Tapes and Spectre (horror, not SF). SF films in the 70s also tended to be message movies, unlike the ones in the 80s. Hence the dystopia themes.
#16
Posted 03 September 2003 - 08:05 PM
Originally posted by Jaelle
In the 80s when SF films became hot again it became a cliche among SF film fans to say that the 70s had been a dry spell, but there was more in that decade than people realized. You named a few. Of course there was also a lot of drek. But I loved Silent Running, Soylent Green, all the Planet of the Apes films (even the awful sequels), Gene Roddenberry's TV films The Questor Tapes and Spectre (horror, not SF). SF films in the 70s also tended to be message movies, unlike the ones in the 80s. Hence the dystopia themes.
I agree. It is a huge understatment to say sci-fi suffered in the '70s. Some of my fondest movie memories growing up came from those films. I think the lines get blurred because people think of the big-budget sci-fi films that came in the wake of Star Wars.
But I'd rather watch Zardoz, Westworld, a Planet of the Apes sequel or Logan's Run than some cheesy '80s thing like Spacehunter, Brainstorm, Battle Beyond the Stars or some of the other big-budget sci-fi clunkers that were part of that time.
#17
Posted 03 September 2003 - 08:08 PM
Oh, and I forgot The Andromeda Strain (1971).
What dry spell? It seems that certain themes and ideas become fashionable during a particular decade, and the films reflect this fashion.
Ideas change, and then people begin to forget about the films.
#18
Posted 03 September 2003 - 08:22 PM
#19
Posted 04 September 2003 - 12:21 AM
#20
Posted 04 September 2003 - 02:49 PM
Originally posted by PrinceKamalKhan
There is a good DVD edition of Logan's Run. It has a feature-length audio commentary with Michael York, the director, and costume designer as well as some other standard inclusions for DVDs of older films, i.e. the original trailer and a "making of" featurette.
There is? Boy, I've been out of the loop! Thanks, that's the next thing on my shopping list!
#21
Posted 04 September 2003 - 03:51 PM
#22
Posted 05 September 2003 - 03:40 PM
Originally posted by ChandlerBing
I recently saw the first Planet of the Apes sequel for the first time and was totally thrown off guard by the idiot ending--or brave, depending on your perspective. Oh, well, it had be better than the Marky Mark remake.
Well Dr. Zaius did warn Taylor about going through the Forbidden Zone!
I guess I would have to say that it's a draw between Tim Burton's remake, or re-imagining, of Planet of the Apes and Beneath the Planet of the Apes. Beneath the Planet of the Apes is almost surreal in its strangeness. In the remake, it appears that Rick Baker has perfected his ape make up.
I was looking at IMDb and realized that Paul Dehn, who co-wrote Goldfinger with Richard Maibaum, also has screenplay credit for Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970), Escape From the Planet of the Apes (1971), Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972), and Battle for the Planet of the Apes (1973). Wow, I did not know that.