Goldfingers Evil Twin Brother
#1
Posted 19 January 2003 - 01:54 PM
#2
Posted 19 January 2003 - 09:48 PM
Perhaps a business partner, or maybe even a son, but the evil twin brother thing is a bit too much for me to believe. It would have come across as a shallow attempt to emulate Goldfinger, and would probably have backfired.
#3
Posted 19 January 2003 - 11:11 PM
'Mother always said Auric was a bit retarded.' wasn't that a proposed line?
#4
Posted 20 January 2003 - 07:17 PM
I agree it would be fun to be able to read the early script treatments of these. Hey EON, this would be a great marketing opportunity for us to see this rare stuff.
#5
Posted 06 February 2003 - 11:20 PM
this was the continuation of the Bond movie no longer following Fleming. It all statred with YOLT. It the film barely worked with the Blofeld theme.Originally posted by Double-0 Six
I only know what you've described, which I originally heard on the DAF DVD. I personally don't think this would have been any good, for a start the concept is too silly (not that DAF isn't a silly film anyway).
Perhaps a business partner, or maybe even a son, but the evil twin brother thing is a bit too much for me to believe. It would have come across as a shallow attempt to emulate Goldfinger, and would probably have backfired.
#6
Posted 06 February 2003 - 11:33 PM
I think that move would have smacked of desparation that early in the series. While the Blofeld of DAF wasn't exactly evil, at least he was a continuing character rather than trying to relive the glory of the best loved villain of the series.
I argee, it kind of sounds like a last roll of the dice, and they really were never that desperate, were they ?. Although if they weren't certain that they'd have Connery back one can kind of understand their thinking.
I like the finished film, though I somethings think they should have made Charles Gray out to be a new villian rather than Blofeld returning, not that it really matters that much.
#7
Posted 06 February 2003 - 11:37 PM
To me Charles Gray , may not be "Evil". Still he had some of the best lines in the film. His delivery was great. I still get a kick out of the exchanges between him and Bond.Originally posted by freemo
I argee, it kind of sounds like a last roll of the dice, and they really were never that desperate, were they ?. Although if they weren't certain that they'd have Connery back one can kind of understand their thinking.
I like the finished film, though I somethings think they should have made Charles Gray out to be a new villian rather than Blofeld returning, not that it really matters that much.
#8
Posted 07 February 2003 - 12:28 AM
But the only good thing about Diamond's in my opinion is Jill St John anyway.
#9
Posted 07 February 2003 - 12:45 AM
To me Charles Gray , may not be "Evil". Still he had some of the best lines in the film. His delivery was great. I still get a kick out of the exchanges between him and Bond.
Yeah, I got nothing against him, was just thinking that his character could have been an entirely new character with a different name rather than being "Blofeld".
#10
Posted 07 February 2003 - 01:36 AM
#11
Posted 07 February 2003 - 01:55 AM
The information about this draft is talked about in an issue of Starlog from 1983 (it has the Roger Moore/Sean Connery cover). Richard Maibaum discusses it during an interview.
The quotes about it are repeated verbatim in Marcus Hearn's Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (both 1st & 2nd editions).
#12
Posted 07 February 2003 - 04:25 AM
#13
Posted 07 February 2003 - 02:25 PM
Your right , Telly was the ideal Blofeld. And Jill St John is very hot. she was similar to the "Tiffany Case" character in the book.Originally posted by 1q2w3e4r
He's a weak Blofeld. Telly is easily the most physically imposing. I think he should have just been a different character.
But the only good thing about Diamond's in my opinion is Jill St John anyway.
#14
Posted 08 February 2003 - 04:55 AM
#15
Posted 14 February 2003 - 12:28 AM
Originally posted by freemo
Yeah, I got nothing against him, was just thinking that his character could have been an entirely new character with a different name rather than being "Blofeld".
I agree.
I think the same could be said about the Telly Savalas Blofeld.
Donald Pleasance and the FYEO Blofeld are THE Blofeld.
#16
Posted 14 February 2003 - 12:48 AM
What is wrong with Telly Savalas's Blofeld ? Donald Pleasance was not the original Blofeld for "YOLT" . A actor named Jan Welch was to play Blofeld. Pleasance replaced him during filming. The person in the "wheelchair" ,holding the cat is not Blofeld. Blofeld died during DAF.Originally posted by JBond007
I think the same could be said about the Telly Savalas Blofeld.
Donald Pleasance and the FYEO Blofeld are THE Blofeld.
#17
Posted 17 February 2003 - 05:13 AM
"Blofeld died during DAF."
Did ya check the vitals? Did ya see the body? (Just kidding, stolen from UnderSiege 2 and seemed appropo).....
Now, that intriguing little fact has been debated to death. Actually, it was never made crystal clear at the end of DAF (the film, anyway, don't know about the book) what the heck really happened to Blofeld. Last we all saw, he was still banging back and forth in his getaway minisub. The sub was never released from the crane as of the moment Bond jumped off the rig. You just knew Blofield didn't die at the climax to YOLT-and it was just as ambiguous here in DAD.
After what that character did to Bond and Tracey, that was an awfully weak and frustrating manner to leave his fate in middair (literally).
I've seen DAD a zillion times and I KNOW I didn't miss anything! LOL!
#18
Posted 17 February 2003 - 12:19 PM
#19
Posted 19 February 2003 - 01:45 PM
Blofeld death in DAF was firmly not established . That why Maibaum was about to bring himback in "TSWLM".Originally posted by rafterman
yeah, what exactly did happen to Blofeld at the end of DAF? Bond swings him around in his little capsule, but that's it......plus how can he be an evil twin? then they'd both be evil...
#20
Posted 19 February 2003 - 04:18 PM
#21
Posted 19 February 2003 - 04:43 PM
#22
Posted 20 February 2003 - 02:45 PM
Blofeld had no place in "LALD". That novel had enough plot and character development to transfer to film. The film was jsut a smaller scale Bond moovie as compared to "DAF" which was large scale Bond on the level of "YOLT". PLus the villians major and minor in "LALD" were black. It was rightly so that EON remained "fairly faithful " to the spirit of the book.Originally posted by sausagebrigade
While it's unsatisfying, it would just be annoying if they brought Blofeld back in LALD...while I enjoy Charles Grey's performance, by that point there was no menace about the character.
#23
Posted 04 March 2003 - 04:54 PM
#24
Posted 10 March 2003 - 09:24 PM