Vin Diesel talks DAD and 007
#1
Posted 31 December 2002 - 08:58 PM
DVDFile: As we talk the new James Bond film (Die Another Day) is just out and seems to be a hit. Did you feel any pressure trying to create a "new Bond" in XXX, and did you intentionally try to pay homage to or avoid any of the elements that has made that series so long-lasting?
V.D: My intentions when I made XXX were not to create a new Bond, but to create an original approach to the secret agent genre, the spy genre. The first and foremost different between XXX and all of its predecessors and contemporaries is that he (Xander Cage) doesn't want to be a secret agent. And that's the first characteristic that makes him fascinating, and makes the story fascinating. That this guy is the quintessential reluctant hero.
I felt like that there was more integrity in that approach, a little bit more tangible about that reality, especially in the wake of September 11th.
DVDFile: What sorts of things did you try to focus in on with the character to make it more accessible, more tangible?
V.D: I remember when I used to see James Bond movies, the one thing I didn't relate to was that this guy seemed like he probably went to school for 12 years to be a secret agent. I was like, "No, that's not going to be me."
DVDFile: While the Bond films are still popular with a wide audience, XXX seems like it was designed to appeal more directly to the young adult demographic...
V.D: It was successful in that demographic, but it was I also found is that when the older audience went to see the film they were tapping into something completely different than the modern cultural influences that were incorporated into the character. They were talking about the characters, the relationships and the storyline. The were intrigued by it , which was cool. I feel like this is a film that entertained, that hopefully anybody that went to it came away entertained.
DVDFile: Did you allow any influence of Bond the character into your portrayal of Cage?
V.D: Bond is the father of these movies. We were just taking it one step further and making it current. That was Rob Cohen's objective. But, of course, you can't help but to take the Bond films into account. Look at it, analyze it, and see what they've done. It would be shortsighted not to. Especially the techniques they used to be as successful as they've been. When we were doing XXX, we knew that we were creating a prototype, and that if this wasn't good and we didn't knock this out of the park, then there wouldn't be others.
THE COMPLETE INTERVIEW IS AVAILABLE AT WWW.DVDFILE.COM
#2
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:03 PM
#3
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:13 PM
I was intrigued by the fact that pre-production has actually begun on not one, but two sequels to xXx.
#4
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:14 PM
As for XXX - I got the DVD today and it's simply, well, good to the averge movie fan. I liked it as a popcorn flick, that's all. When I want Bond, I have my 007 Giftset to watch. And as for the next two XXX films - I've heard what Cohen wants in XXX2. He wants a dirtbike chase on top of the Capitol building. I'd like to make this official - ROB COHEN IS A HORSE'S ***. He knows nadda about a good film. TFATF was different though, but now John Singleton has the reigns to that franchise.
And as for DAD - yes it was GREAT but no it lacked that old Bond spark. I so want a Bond film that downplays the extreme stunts aspect. And CGI - go watch the FX feature in TND. The CGI in TND is NOT noticeable at all, but yet DAD is corny. Hoo boy. Get that CGI crew from TND back!!
#5
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:18 PM
#6
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:26 PM
#7
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:29 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
This is a JameS Bond Fan Post?chat. Why(?) waste time discussing a loser like Vin Diesel. What he should be doing is looking then play the part of the Bond Villina in Bond 21. XXX was a waste of valuble money. It only serve to highen interest in the real thing. 007 ,James Bond. So heart felt thanks.
Yes, Barbara Broccoli said in an interview that she believes movies such as Austin Powers and xXx help the James Bond franchise by creating interest in the genre..
After all, all those 007 rip-offs in the 1960s hardly hurt James Bonds box office.
#8
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:38 PM
#9
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:49 PM
#10
Posted 31 December 2002 - 09:52 PM
~LTK~
#11
Posted 01 January 2003 - 06:45 AM
Medicre actor at best. Saw TFATF, didn't bother with xXx. More of a personality with "attitude".
I understand there needs to be a new up and coming crop of new action stars to replace Stallone, Arnold, etc. But THIS guy? C'mon!
I can't take him seriously at all.
I sure hope EON never uses him in a Bond film. He would cheaspen the franshise.
#12
Posted 01 January 2003 - 11:28 PM
#13
Posted 02 January 2003 - 12:25 AM
#14
Posted 02 January 2003 - 02:36 AM
#15
Posted 02 January 2003 - 06:28 AM
#16
Posted 02 January 2003 - 12:53 PM
It didn't seem as if they went out to trash 007 movies, or the James Bond character. xXx was so completely different.
If you want a movie that cheapens the James Bond movies look at the Derek Flint series.
I am REALLY looking forward to xXx 2 and xXx 3....The scripts are already being written for both so we should see them going before the cameras soon...Maybe they will do them back-to-back ala LOTR?!
#17
Posted 02 January 2003 - 01:19 PM
#18
Posted 02 January 2003 - 01:29 PM
Loved it, in some respects I preferred it to DAD.
#19
Posted 02 January 2003 - 01:33 PM
#20
Posted 02 January 2003 - 04:05 PM
#21
Posted 02 January 2003 - 10:19 PM
#22
Posted 03 January 2003 - 01:57 PM
Originally posted by Blue Eyes
Preferred xXx to DAD? Wow. I couldn't even watch xXx. I turned it off after about 15 minutes on the plane as the acting and scripting was so utterly horrible.
I said IN SOME RESPECTS I preferred xXx to DAD.
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. I think a person has every right to enjoy both xXx and DAD.
#23
Posted 04 January 2003 - 06:41 AM
#24
Posted 05 January 2003 - 01:38 AM