What If, there was no DB5
#1
Posted 22 May 2012 - 06:11 PM
#2
Posted 22 May 2012 - 07:07 PM
#3
Posted 22 May 2012 - 07:34 PM
The Jaguar MKII is a beauty but I somehow associate it more with the wheels of the villain, bit like a Mercedes.
#4
Posted 22 May 2012 - 09:22 PM
Connery thought the DB5 was a 'lady's car'; that's a man's car. I'd say it's a fresher design than the DB5 too; I love the DB5 but it's really a 50's car.
#5
Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:19 PM
So, to answer the question, if a Jag had the gadgets then I do believe we would be thinking of it in the same way as we do the AM.
#6
Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:37 PM
Yes, I have to admit that the Jaguar MK2 3.8 is a very Conneryesque car, but I'm not so sure if it's looks like a Bondish vehicleAs per title, what if Sean Connery drove a Jaguar E-Type or a Jaguar MK2 3.8 in Goldfinger/Thunderball, would this be any less iconic? I have always pictured SC driving a MK2 3.8 more than a E-Type, in my eyes the Jaguar MK2 was better looking than the DB5 and elegantly sinister. Any thoughts?
Yes, it's true the DB5 design is a little bit stucked on the 50's particularly the rear end of the car.A car I think Bond should have had (although it was released the year after Goldfinger so wouldn't have replaced the DB5) is the AC 428. British, stylish, massive American engine... it's right up Fleming's street:
I'd say it's a fresher design than the DB5 too; I love the DB5 but it's really a 50's car.
#7
Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:10 AM
#8
Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:11 AM
#9
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
Honestly (and I say this as a huge Jaguar enthusiast), I don't think the Jaguar would have reached the Bond iconic status of the Aston Martin. Why? Because the production was higher and many more people owned them. Seeing an Aston Martin is a rare thing and when most people see them they associate Bond. There are many more Jaguars on the road than there are Aston Martins.
I think it was about half the price of a DB5, wasn't it? And faster.
I'm sure I've read that Jaguar refused to supply an E-Type too.
#10
Posted 26 May 2012 - 12:59 AM
#11
Posted 26 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
I think it was about half the price of a DB5, wasn't it? And faster.
I'm sure I've read that Jaguar refused to supply an E-Type too.
It is the TV show The Saint that you are thinking of. Since Bond drove and Aston Martin in the book GF, that is what the producers went after. As far as I know, an E-type was never an option.
#12
Posted 26 May 2012 - 10:31 AM
They may be wrong, of course. I don't have my copy of Most Famous Car in the World with me.
In fact, search for 'E-Type Goldfinger' and you'll find that story all over the place; so, no: it's not The Saint I'm thinking of.
Although oddly Bond's DB5 did make an appearance on The Saint before fiding fame in Goldfinger, 'BMT' numberplate and all!
#13
Posted 26 May 2012 - 11:02 AM
However, I don't know about the Jag story relating to Goldfinger. There is nothing I could see in the Most Famous Car in the World book. Aston did refuse to lend them an AM, so thoughts did veer towards Bentley and a Chevy(!), but they always wanted the AM. And they got it.
#14
Posted 26 May 2012 - 11:08 AM
Some say the E-Type story for The Saint is actually erroneous: Roger wanted a Mk X, and although Jaguar were happy to supply it, they couldn't do it in time.
As a sidenote; I watched the slightly rubbish Tower Heist a few weeks ago: there's an amazing replica of a Ferrari 250 GT Lusso in that, which was apparently made from a Volvo P1800. It's an incredible bit of work.
#15
Posted 26 May 2012 - 12:28 PM
I must admit to not knowing or having forgotten the Mk X story.
#16
Posted 26 May 2012 - 06:05 PM
#17
Posted 26 May 2012 - 11:34 PM
Curious that Jaguar were happy to supply that which they couldn't supply, but didn't want to supply something that (we are, over time, lead to believe) they could supply.
Not really: it's the same thing. They'd give them a car but they'd have to go on the waiting list.
#18
Posted 27 May 2012 - 08:42 AM