Let's just say that Fiennes is Blofeld.
#1
Posted 03 November 2011 - 04:31 PM
#2
Posted 03 November 2011 - 04:46 PM
So what role would Bond have? The classic temptation is to imagine a sort of Yojimbo situation in which 007 deftly plays one foe against the other. But perhaps Bond could simply be trying to survive, minimize casualties, and "keep the British end up" as the turf war spirals wildly out of control. Lots of dramatic possibilities in this.
#3
Posted 03 November 2011 - 04:49 PM
#4
Posted 03 November 2011 - 04:58 PM
Sadly, though, I would expect, given the vehement public outcry against QOS, that we've possibly seen the last of Quantum.
#5
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:15 PM
They built up Quantum too much to just drop it. Surely it will return. Despite what they've said about Skyfall being unrelated to CR and QOS, that doesn't mean it will be a one-off in the grand scheme of things. A character may well be introduced, or a chain of events set in motion, which will, in the subsequent film, tie it back in with Quantum. If Fiennes turns out to be Blofeld or a Blofeld-type character, he will turn out to have been the force behind everything in CR and QOS. That way everything wraps up in the fourth film rather than the third. If we assume that Craig is doing one more film after Skyfall, which is a reasonable assumption, it will make very little sense to resolve everything in Skyfall and leave no unfinished business for Craig's final outing.
#6
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:23 PM
In my skimming earlier, I thought I saw a line from the news conference saying that the word Skyfall would have some sort of "emotional" resonance? Naturally, I may be deluded, but it was the word "emotional" which piqued my interest. It seemed like an odd word to make reference to. The matter at hand is whether 'Skyfall' is a who, a where, a what, etc.What if "the organisation" is called Skyfall?
Anyway, I do indeed like the idea of it being Quantum vs. A.N. Other Group of Baddies - but that may well be redundant given the comment that it's not connected to QUANTUM OF SOLACE and CASINO ROYALE.
#7
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:31 PM
What if "the organisation" is called Skyfall?
NOPE. SkyFall is the Scottish estate where the climatic scenes take place. It's obvious from the
title, Craig's comments, and the brief story synopsis.
And I very much doubt Blofeld is back, but we def know Quantum is NOT back for this film.
#8
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:35 PM
#9
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:35 PM
What if "the organisation" is called Skyfall?
NOPE. SkyFall is the Scottish estate where the climatic scenes take place. It's obvious from the
title, Craig's comments, and the brief story synopsis.
And I very much doubt Blofeld is back, but we def know Quantum is NOT back for this film.
Ehh maybe.
"Sam, tell us about the Scottish elements and Bond going back to his roots.
Mendes: “You’re not entirely accurate about him going back to his roots… there is a Scottish element, and it is the wilds of Scotland.”
We shall see, but Craig did say that Skyfall refers to a geographic region.
#10
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:39 PM
#11
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:39 PM
What if "the organisation" is called Skyfall?
NOPE. SkyFall is the Scottish estate where the climatic scenes take place. It's obvious from the
title, Craig's comments, and the brief story synopsis.
And I very much doubt Blofeld is back, but we def know Quantum is NOT back for this film.
Ehh maybe.
"Sam, tell us about the Scottish elements and Bond going back to his roots.
Mendes: “You’re not entirely accurate about him going back to his roots… there is a Scottish element, and it is the wilds of Scotland.”
We shall see, but Craig did say that Skyfall refers to a geographic region.
Yep, it's a location - which maybe about M's roots, not Bond's. I never said it was about Bond's roots - but, hey, maybe it is (?)
#12
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:40 PM
It could be very interesting. When two ruthless criminal organizations are locked in deadly combat, anything is possible. Just look at the nightmarish rivalry between the Mexican drug cartels. This concept has the potential to be bloodier, more terrifying, and generally more unpredictable than a plot in which one disciplined organization has the situation under tight control.
So what role would Bond have? The classic temptation is to imagine a sort of Yojimbo situation in which 007 deftly plays one foe against the other. But perhaps Bond could simply be trying to survive, minimize casualties, and "keep the British end up" as the turf war spirals wildly out of control. Lots of dramatic possibilities in this.
I could see 007 playing one off the other like Clint Eastwood did in FIST FULL OF DOLLARS. Reminds me a little of LTK. Think about it; Timothy Dalton's Bond really didn't kill any bad guys (other than SANCHEZ). they were killed of as Sanchez began to distrust them all.
#13
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:34 PM
However a possible return of SPECTRE would be greatly appreciated if of course the organisation is up-to-date regarding its criminal activities.
#14
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:45 PM
#15
Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:03 PM
What if "the organisation" is called Skyfall?
NOPE. SkyFall is the Scottish estate where the climatic scenes take place. It's obvious from the
title, Craig's comments, and the brief story synopsis.
Scottish estates don't really have names like that (its too pronouncable, for a start). Another guess - with the comments about M's past coming back to haunt her, maybe "Skyfall" was the code name of an operation she headed up in the cold war/in her early days as M, which ended badly and now the consequences of it are happening.
#16
Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:24 PM
#17
Posted 04 November 2011 - 05:23 AM
#18
Posted 04 November 2011 - 10:45 AM
If Fiennes is Blofeld, I wouldn't mind if he only appeared in one film and was killed off at the end. I'd much rather EON go in for one deifnitive interpretation of the character rather than dilute him over multiple appearances.
I was thinking along the same lines. Have him be a powerful presence in one film, much the way Moriarity initially had one strong appearance in The Final Problem but his character resonated over the whole original mythology thereafter.
#19
Posted 04 November 2011 - 10:51 AM
Tell me that's not "darkly complex".
#20
Posted 04 November 2011 - 10:59 AM
#21
Posted 05 November 2011 - 09:47 PM
That being said, I don't want to know what his character in Skyfall will be. I remember that TWINE's plot was somehow ruined from the very beginning when we learnt, well before the movie was released, that Sophie Marceau was to play a villain. No surprise, everybody knew that Bond was chasing the wrong villain, hence a weakened plot.
#22
Posted 05 November 2011 - 11:42 PM
I actually reckon Fiennes could be Miles Messervy. Sure, the tabloids have talked him up as Blofeld, but they also thought Naomie Harris would be Moneypenny. If they can be wrong about Harris, they can be wrong about Fiennes. And when you think about it, the role of M is "darkly complex" the way the reports talked the role up - he's a man who has to order the deaths of other people, be perfectly willing to send others to their deaths, and (if I'm right about certain other elements of the plot:
Spoiler
Tell me that's not "darkly complex".
Played with the idea of Fiennes being Messervy myself ever since they didn't want to reveal the character names for Fiennes, Whishaw and Finney, because they'd be to revealing for Bond fans.
Three familiar names. Let's say at least one of them has to be a good guy.
Three options:
1st: One of them is a new M. Whishaw too young, Finney too old - it's Fiennes.
Which means that we've seen the last of Dench's M. And they won't dismiss her in some kind of witch hunt, too important character - she's going to die.
2nd: One of them is the new Q. Finney too old, Fiennes just not the type - it's Whishaw. Could play the nerdy/geeky type, young enough to be a believable gee-whizz kid handling modern technology.
3rd: Whishaw is the new Fiennes M's secretary Sheldon J. Monneypenny. Not very likely, but it's an option.
No real good guy option for Finney, that leaves him as baddie. With Bardem playing the Largo type, he could be Blofeld. Or -dare I say it - Shatterhand...
#23
Posted 06 November 2011 - 12:17 AM
#24
Posted 06 November 2011 - 12:28 AM
I disagree. I don't think it automatically means that Dench will be killed off. The plot synopsis makes it pretty clear that M's previous actions will have consequences for the film, so evidently something big is going to happen. I think it would be far more interesting to see M's career ruined, simply because it would give Dench some good material. Once she's dead, she's dead - but how would she react to being forced to resign out of disgrace?Which means that we've seen the last of Dench's M. And they won't dismiss her in some kind of witch hunt, too important character - she's going to die.
The Daily Mail claims that Finney is a career politician who has amassed a lot of power form himself, and has managed to position himself as M's boss. However, my suspicion is that "Skyfall" is the name of an operation that was covered up when it failed, because it could be damaging to those involved. In that case, I could see Finney as one of M's co-conspirators, and maybe named Frederick Grey ...No real good guy option for Finney, that leaves him as baddie.
#25
Posted 06 November 2011 - 09:23 AM
#26
Posted 06 November 2011 - 01:55 PM
How about Bardem's character's father went down on the Belgrano, sunk by false information fed through by M, and now he wants RE-WEN-GE and the castle in Scotland isn't in Scotalns it's actually in the Falklands (which looks a bit like Scotland) - the Skyfalklands- and all sorts of crazy stuff happens? A little bit of politics for you there.
Needlessly political, with a decidedly un-Bondian anti-Thatcher bent.
#27
Posted 07 November 2011 - 01:16 AM
#28
Posted 07 November 2011 - 01:31 AM
And that's my thing, just make it fun EON, just make it fun.
#29
Posted 07 November 2011 - 01:44 AM
How about Bardem's character's father went down on the Belgrano, sunk by false information fed through by M, and now he wants RE-WEN-GE and the castle in Scotland isn't in Scotalns it's actually in the Falklands (which looks a bit like Scotland) - the Skyfalklands- and all sorts of crazy stuff happens? A little bit of politics for you there.
Needlessly political, with a decidedly un-Bondian anti-Thatcher bent.
No comment on the idea itself, but I don't see how it's "anti-Thatcher" if the villain is an Argentine. Unless it's anti-Thatcher merely because it alludes to an episode in the Falklands War which doesn't necessarily reflect well on the UK. Was it "anti-Churchill" to mention the Lienz cossacks?
#30
Posted 07 November 2011 - 02:30 AM
If the Falklands were to be a part of the plot, would the villain be a member of the Argentine Air Force, or the Argentine Army? One would be very convincing as a villain ... the other, not so much.I don't see how it's "anti-Thatcher" if the villain is an Argentine.