http://www.life.com/...-bond-auditions
Brynner as Blofeld...Just perfect !
Edited by Achille Aubergine, 27 November 2010 - 10:15 AM.
Posted 27 November 2010 - 10:07 AM
Edited by Achille Aubergine, 27 November 2010 - 10:15 AM.
Posted 27 November 2010 - 08:22 PM
If Anthony Rogers was one of the five finalists whittled down from 400, I shudder to imagine what the other 395 applicants looked like.
Picture #16 looks like Pierce Brosnan. Pictures #13 and #14 make me wonder what they ever saw in George Lazenby. If Robert Campbell had even half of Lazenby's acting "ability" he should have been hired. Shave off the mutton chops in pic#13 and you would never know that photo was taken back in 1968. Classic, clean good looks last a lifetime. Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
Posted 27 November 2010 - 11:51 PM
If Anthony Rogers was one of the five finalists whittled down from 400, I shudder to imagine what the other 395 applicants looked like.
Picture #16 looks like Pierce Brosnan. Pictures #13 and #14 make me wonder what they ever saw in George Lazenby. If Robert Campbell had even half of Lazenby's acting "ability" he should have been hired. Shave off the mutton chops in pic#13 and you would never know that photo was taken back in 1968. Classic, clean good looks last a lifetime. Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
Rogers has a bit of a James Coburn thing going on, so maybe they were looking for an In Like Flint-esque guy. I agree that Campbell is the pick of the bunch here, and if I was basing my decision on choosing from these photos, he'd get the gig. He does look a bit like Brosnan and/or Josh Brolin.
Posted 28 November 2010 - 02:27 AM
Campbell, it appears, was/is an American.
Now obviously EON would have known that when he was tested, but I wonder if they found he couldn't do a reasonable Brit accent and that did his chances in????
Posted 28 November 2010 - 04:32 AM
Sorry if you knew it already :
http://www.life.com/...-bond-auditions
Brynner as Blofeld...Just perfect !
If Anthony Rogers was one of the five finalists whittled down from 400, I shudder to imagine what the other 395 applicants looked like.
Picture #16 looks like Pierce Brosnan. Pictures #13 and #14 make me wonder what they ever saw in George Lazenby. If Robert Campbell had even half of Lazenby's acting "ability" he should have been hired. Shave off the mutton chops in pic#13 and you would never know that photo was taken back in 1968. Classic, clean good looks last a lifetime. Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
Posted 28 November 2010 - 03:29 PM
Sounds like you're applying NFL standards on character to an actor. In this case, Lazenby would have been a great fit for the Cincinnati Bengals.Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
Posted 28 November 2010 - 05:36 PM
Sounds like you're applying NFL standards on character to an actor. In this case, Lazenby would have been a great fit for the Cincinnati Bengals.
Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
I don't know that would have worked in 1968 or if there even was such a thing. Could anybody really foresee the decisions Lazenby would make? Given that OHMSS is now viewed as a classic, who really knows if any of the others would have been any better or cares. The series may have ended in the '70s for all we know.
Also bear in mind as well that Connery made plenty of public rumblings about being dissatisfied with the Bond role and openly criticized Broccoli and Saltzman. If reports from the time are to be believed Connery refused to do a screentest and gave indications he would be a handful. Given his success in the role, a lot of that gets forgotten.
Posted 29 November 2010 - 09:22 AM
Posted 29 November 2010 - 01:55 PM
Posted 29 November 2010 - 03:54 PM
Nice pics.
Well, I know looking at pictures doesn't mean much (I never would've thought Craig would look so good as Bond after seeing him in Layer Cake and a couple of pics), but on the whole these men don't amount to much. De Vries and Rogers? Please!
Anyway, looking at Laz' pics, I wish he could have done a couple more Bond films. He would then have had the opportunity to fine-tune his presence, which was already great, into something even better.
Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:28 PM
Sounds like you're applying NFL standards on character to an actor. In this case, Lazenby would have been a great fit for the Cincinnati Bengals.
Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
I don't know that would have worked in 1968 or if there even was such a thing. Could anybody really foresee the decisions Lazenby would make? Given that OHMSS is now viewed as a classic, who really knows if any of the others would have been any better or cares. The series may have ended in the '70s for all we know.
Also bear in mind as well that Connery made plenty of public rumblings about being dissatisfied with the Bond role and openly criticized Broccoli and Saltzman. If reports from the time are to be believed Connery refused to do a screentest and gave indications he would be a handful. Given his success in the role, a lot of that gets forgotten.
I've always thought that part of the reason they went with (let's face it) a rather motley collection of "finalists" is precisely because of Connery's "rumblings." Unless you were around at the time, as I was, it's hard to envision the effect that Bond had on the pop culture of the time. I don't think anything before or since has informed pop culture the way Bond did circa 1965. Naturally, Connery, as the literal personification of Bond, was seen by many, including the star himself, as being a very important part of the phenomenon. More so than the producers would have liked. As far as Saltzman and Broccoli were concerned, they were the driving force behind the films' success. Seen in this light, it makes perfect sense that the producers might feel that the best way to put this whole Connery thing to rest was to get someone "off the street" (or close to it), make him a successful Bond and reassert their status as genius producers.
Posted 29 November 2010 - 10:27 PM
Sounds like you're applying NFL standards on character to an actor. In this case, Lazenby would have been a great fit for the Cincinnati Bengals.
Lazenby was okay looking and acting, but clearly the wrong choice was made for OHMSS and someone didn't perform due-dilligence on Lazenby. If they had done a proper background check they might have discovered he was immature and not to be trusted and saved themselves a disastrous PR campaign.
I don't know that would have worked in 1968 or if there even was such a thing. Could anybody really foresee the decisions Lazenby would make? Given that OHMSS is now viewed as a classic, who really knows if any of the others would have been any better or cares. The series may have ended in the '70s for all we know.
Also bear in mind as well that Connery made plenty of public rumblings about being dissatisfied with the Bond role and openly criticized Broccoli and Saltzman. If reports from the time are to be believed Connery refused to do a screentest and gave indications he would be a handful. Given his success in the role, a lot of that gets forgotten.
I've always thought that part of the reason they went with (let's face it) a rather motley collection of "finalists" is precisely because of Connery's "rumblings." Unless you were around at the time, as I was, it's hard to envision the effect that Bond had on the pop culture of the time. I don't think anything before or since has informed pop culture the way Bond did circa 1965. Naturally, Connery, as the literal personification of Bond, was seen by many, including the star himself, as being a very important part of the phenomenon. More so than the producers would have liked. As far as Saltzman and Broccoli were concerned, they were the driving force behind the films' success. Seen in this light, it makes perfect sense that the producers might feel that the best way to put this whole Connery thing to rest was to get someone "off the street" (or close to it), make him a successful Bond and reassert their status as genius producers.
And it would appear that none of the runners up were considered again after the Lazenby implosion for either DAF or LALD.
So eventually it seems the producers went for a half-way-house compromise, neither ego driven star like Connery nor non-entity like Lazenby and these guys.
They went for a failed movie star and fading TV actor who was only too happy and compliant for the gig - Roger Moore.