I have begun!
#1
Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:35 AM
Incidentally this starts my oddyssey to read all of Gardner's Bond novels...wish me luck.
#2
Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:57 AM
#3
Posted 10 June 2009 - 04:26 AM
Good luck! I've always enjoyed John Gardner's novels, despite the fact that they're quite a different experience than Ian Fleming's works. Here's hoping you enjoy them, and that you'll post some of your thoughts as you read.
The sole Garnder novel I did read was an enjoyable experience. I'd rather have a whole new experience reading a Bond novel than have Fleming lite.
#4
Posted 10 June 2009 - 05:35 AM
#5
Posted 10 June 2009 - 05:48 AM
Couldnt tell you about the other Benson novels though, I never read em.
#6
Posted 10 June 2009 - 05:59 AM
#7
Posted 10 June 2009 - 06:13 AM
#8
Posted 10 June 2009 - 06:24 AM
Tarl - I echo you thoughts on Icebreaker - I always envisioned James Coburn playing Tirpitz.
#9
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:34 AM
We shall see though.
#10
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:44 AM
Sure, I could critique each one one pro and con, but he gave the literary series a good shot of life. The funny part is that a lot of the elements from those novels somehow ended up being incorporated here and there into the films.
When you get to Role of Honour, there's a computer game battle between Bond and the villain that was apparently changed because it was too close to the video battle between Bond and Largo in NSNA.
Carry on good man. Carry on. The first three Gardner's are solid IMO.
#11
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:59 AM
Sure, Gardner - even in his early books - isn't writing about Ian Fleming's James Bond. But then, none of the continuations novelists are writing about Fleming's Bond - NOT EVEN CHARLIE HIGSON.
With these restrictions in mind - as a non-Fleming - Licence is a perfect "Bond" novel, unlikely many, many others.
#12
Posted 10 June 2009 - 08:10 AM
Wish me luck.
You'll need it with the Gardner abominations...
#13
Posted 10 June 2009 - 08:23 AM
Agreed.You'll need it with the Gardner abominations...
I find Gardner’s novels typically uninspired and boring.
#14
Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:39 AM
#15
Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:56 AM
Next up is The Man From Barbarossa.
The memory of wading through that bloody book to the bitter end will haunt me for the rest of my days...
#16
Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:20 AM
I'm aware of its reputation, so I'm keen to see what I think of it. I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised, but know that I'll most likely find myself crushed to discover it's every bit as awful as it's said to be.The memory of wading through that bloody book to the bitter end will haunt me for the rest of my days...Next up is The Man From Barbarossa.
#17
Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:31 PM
Next up is The Man From Barbarossa.
The memory of wading through that bloody book to the bitter end will haunt me for the rest of my days...
Have to agree. It was a chore to get through that book at times.
#18
Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:56 PM
#19
Posted 10 June 2009 - 04:22 PM
Best of luck, Jimmy. The nice thing with the Gardner series is that if you read them in chronological order, you get a nice assortment of his better Bond adventures right at the beginning. Licence Renewed, For Special Services, Icebreaker and Nobody Lives Forever are all some of his best. After that there are some hits and misses.
Next up is The Man From Barbarossa.
The memory of wading through that bloody book to the bitter end will haunt me for the rest of my days...
Have to agree. It was a chore to get through that book at times.
Took me three attempts to get through it myself.
#20
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:39 PM
#21
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:42 PM
So what are everyone's opinions on Death is Forever? I know it's a late Gardner, and I do remember enjoying it, so I can't help that I'll probably even enjoy the most mediocre of Garnder.
See No Deals, Mr Bond and change some of the names.
You'll need it with the Gardner abominations...
Well, the first half dozen are pretty jolly but things go a smidge off at Scorpius - probably familiarity with the routines - and then there is, admittedly, a dramatic tailing off.
#22
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:44 PM
So what are everyone's opinions on Death is Forever? I know it's a late Gardner, and I do remember enjoying it, so I can't help that I'll probably even enjoy the most mediocre of Garnder.
I suppose if I'm being absolutely fair, Death Is Forever is one of the Gardners that offended me least. That said, they do all tend to merge into a mediocre pudding now as it's years since I picked one up, even though I have most (all?) as first edition hardbacks.
#23
Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:48 PM
That's why I said "Wish me luck" (with tongue firmly in cheek of course).
#24
Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:17 PM
#25
Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:36 PM
#26
Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:15 AM
Good luck in your assignments JimmyBond and Dark, and enjoy.
#27
Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:59 AM
This is actually more interesting as I was waiting to hear about the "dark" side of Gardner
The odd thing is that I actually like a lot of Gardner's non-Bond books. His thriller The Dancing Dodo is one of my favourite books. But I found his Bond books ghastly, to be honest.
#28
Posted 11 June 2009 - 10:44 PM
I'm aware of its reputation, so I'm keen to see what I think of it. I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised, but know that I'll most likely find myself crushed to discover it's every bit as awful as it's said to be.The memory of wading through that bloody book to the bitter end will haunt me for the rest of my days...Next up is The Man From Barbarossa.
This is the book that Gardner liked best.
It is one of his best and certainly the most interesting. It is the only one that breaks the formula and takes risks(for the first two thirds).