Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Is this the new "Q"?


41 replies to this topic

#1 danslittlefinger

danslittlefinger

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3680 posts
  • Location:“If not here . . . then elsewhere.”

Posted 07 December 2008 - 04:08 PM

http://www.walesonli...91466-22423355/

Philip Madoc is on Q to be James Bond star

PHILIP MADOC has been tipped to fill the shoes of James Bond gadget boffin Q in the next 007 movie.

Current Bond Daniel Craig has revealed he wants the role, made famous by Welshman Desmond Llewellyn, revived. And the heavyweight Welsh actor has been named by leading 007 expert as perfect for the role alongside Craig’s more serious Bond.

The character of Q last appeared in 2002’s Die Another Day, when he was played by Fawlty Towers star John Cleese. But Bond devotees complained Cleese’s Q failed to match the high standards set by Newport-born Llewellyn, who appeared in a record-breaking 17 Bond movies.

Craig, who starred in Casino RoyaleCORR and Quantum of Solace, said: “I’d love to see Q come back. But we should give Q to a good actor. Q has been done brilliantly and with great humour, but we have to find a way to bring Q into it properly.”

Graham Rye, the editor of online 007magazine.co.uk, said Craig’s comments revealed the affection bond fans still have for with which Llewellyn’s character is still held by Bond fans.

He said: “It’s a testament to Desmond’s portrayal of the character because Q was a character everybody expected to see in those movies and they really enjoyed his take on the role. You will never replace Desmond – he was a one off. He was so charming in the role and he was beloved by the audience.

“One of the things I always remember him telling me was that, wherever he went, whatever country he was in, he could talk to anybody of any age or any class.

“The one thing they had in common was Bond, and everyone recognised him as Q.”

Llewellyn was known to millions as the mastermind behind 007’s arsenal of secret weapons. He played the eccentric genius with a love of crazy gadgets until his death at 85 in 1999.

“There was this irascible quality. He never really got on with Bond and was quite disdainful of him,” said Rye.

“He was the only person that would boss Bond about. Sometimes it was like watching a schoolteacher treating a naughty pupil.

“The whole thing about the Bond/Q relationship was that Bond held the gadgets in disdain and didn’t think he really needed them, and Q held Bond in disdain because Bond didn’t give him and the gadgets the respect he thought they deserved.”

Rye said that whoever followed Llewellyn and Cleese into the role would have difficulty emulating Llewellyn’s enduring popularity.

“It was a very special part and Desmond thoroughly loved playing Q because he became synonymous with the role,” said Rye, who became friends with Llewellyn during the latter part of his career.

“It did affect him for other work because he became typecast, but he made the role his own and there wasn’t really anyone who could take over.“There’s no problem reintroducing Q into the films, as long as it’s done in the same serious fashion the two Daniel Craig films have taken.

“I don’t think it worked having somebody camp it up like John Cleese did; that wasn’t my kind of thing. It was too comedic, too broad and too much slapstick.

“One would imagine it would be a well-established, elderly actor, perhaps a Shakespearean actor.”

Rye said 74-year-old Madoc, best known for the title role in the BBC Wales drama The Life and Times of David Lloyd George, would be perfect in the role.

Rye said: “He’s a good actor and he’s got the necessary gravitas, a man who would know everything about anything.”

And Rye said if casting executives were seeking an actor in the same mould as Llewellyn, they should look at former Waiting For God star Graham Crowden.

Rye said of the 86-year-old Scotsman: “He’s a great actor and the kind of guy who could project the right image, but perhaps he’s a little too old.”

Posted Image

#2 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 07 December 2008 - 04:28 PM

i'd be fine with this man playing Q :(

#3 Vanya86

Vanya86

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 93 posts
  • Location:Wales

Posted 07 December 2008 - 04:50 PM

Could we at least call this what it is. Madoc is this Graham Rye guy's choice for Q, nothing more.

#4 danslittlefinger

danslittlefinger

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3680 posts
  • Location:“If not here . . . then elsewhere.”

Posted 07 December 2008 - 04:53 PM

Not bad but I think this guy could do it better,, talk about a dry sarcastic wit..

Posted Image

Richard Wilson best known for "One Foot in the Grave".

Great actor!

#5 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:00 PM

Could we at least call this what it is. Madoc is this Graham Rye guy's choice for Q, nothing more.


Agreed.

I somewhat disagree with Rye. If they reintroduce Q, they should not do what they did before and try to copy Llewlyn.

#6 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:03 PM

Could we at least call this what it is. Madoc is this Graham Rye guy's choice for Q, nothing more.

Good point.

Not bad but I think this guy could do it better,, talk about a dry sarcastic wit..

Posted Image

Richard Wilson best known for "One Foot in the Grave".

Great actor!

He is, but too old to be Q, as are Rye's two suggestions.

#7 danslittlefinger

danslittlefinger

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3680 posts
  • Location:“If not here . . . then elsewhere.”

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:08 PM

Richard is 70 and Madoc is 74...!

..god help us all if 70 is now over the hill to play a "seasoned" Quartermaster.

#8 stamper

stamper

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2994 posts
  • Location:Under the sea

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:26 PM

This is a joke thread right ? If any of those guys is Q in the next one, you might as well have Paris Hilton playing Moneypenny... The series is now directionless again...

#9 Vanya86

Vanya86

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 93 posts
  • Location:Wales

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:31 PM

Appreciate the change in heading. To be fair my comment was directed more at the article itself, whoever wrote it had no right to proclaim “Philip Madoc is on Q to be James Bond star ” based on nothing more than someone on the internet's personal preference.

While we're naming names and posting photos here's my choice: Colin Baker
Posted Image
That's right, Dr Who no. 6. He's an incredibly underrated actor, a familiar face but not so well known as to dominate the screen, we know he can play an eccentric genius and isn't likely to be tied up with other projects. And at 65 he shouldn't fall into the too old category.

#10 Cody

Cody

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1393 posts

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:47 PM

..god help us all if 70 is now over the hill to play a "seasoned" Quartermaster.


It's not about being over the hill, but about casting an actor of an age less likely to succumb to "death by natural causes" before they can have a good run in the series.

#11 Trident

Trident

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2658 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:53 PM

I really don't care too much for who they choose to play Q as long as it's a good actor (or perhaps even actress). Only thing I really don't want is a comeback of a parody armourer. If there simply is no necessity for a Q character, then there shouldn't be one. I'd only welcome a Q if

a) the character brings something new/different/interesting to the new storyline and

b ) it was played as straight as possible without clownish ado and stale jokes.

Mind you, that doesn't mean there cannot be humour and that humour cannot relate in some way to Q. But it shouldn't be a lacklustre and-now-owlish-Q-with-outlandish-gadgets-scene-prepare-your-shopping-list-for-christmas effort.

Likewise I don't really see the need for a return to gadgets. Most of our mobiles today have all the features Bond would ever feel a need for (apart from plain old shooting; and that you still do best with a plain old gun).

#12 danslittlefinger

danslittlefinger

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3680 posts
  • Location:“If not here . . . then elsewhere.”

Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:55 PM

..god help us all if 70 is now over the hill to play a "seasoned" Quartermaster.


It's not about being over the hill, but about casting an actor of an age less likely to succumb to "death by natural causes" before they can have a good run in the series.



Cant people in their 70's be healthy and live a long time?

So they sign a 70 yr old up for say 4 films that film every two years (ish)..there are tons of very agile 80 yrs old around..

ageist statement by Rye

and the change of my subtitle: my original one wasnt a dig at Welsh people in fact it was a glorious statement!

Edited by danslittlefinger, 07 December 2008 - 05:56 PM.


#13 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:18 PM

and the change of my subtitle: my original one wasnt a dig at Welsh people in fact it was a glorious statement!

I changed that just to clarify where these suggestions came from (the initial subtitle wasn't offensive at all - I thought it was just worth clarifying that these weren't official suggestions by anyone associated with the films).

Cant people in their 70's be healthy and live a long time?

So they sign a 70 yr old up for say 4 films that film every two years (ish)..there are tons of very agile 80 yrs old around..

ageist statement by Rye

I wouldn't call it an ageist statement - heck, I made the same statement a few posts up. It's not only a matter of agility but plausibility. I know Dench is now 73, but I daresay she's approaching the tail end of her run as M. Introducing a Q who's already in his 70s would not only be implausible, but could actually evoke the memory of Llewellyn. If Eon decide to bring back the character, I think they'd want a complete and utter overhaul.

#14 Pierce - Daniel

Pierce - Daniel

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 719 posts

Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:39 PM

I think they should make Q Major Boothroyd from now on, make him a really hard :(, he won't take none of Bond's cheek.
Who could do it????????

Michael Caine
Bill Nighy
Anthony Hopkins
Michael Gambon

#15 danslittlefinger

danslittlefinger

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3680 posts
  • Location:“If not here . . . then elsewhere.”

Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:40 PM

Well that's a good point, Dench is 73 but I really dont think she will leave as M until Craig does his run.

So why not a Q in his 70's? But we'll see I guess.

re: the change of subtitle : fair enough!

#16 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:49 PM

Well that's a good point, Dench is 73 but I really dont think she will leave as M until Craig does his run.

I don't think so either. Unless her character's departure is part of a storyline.

#17 stamper

stamper

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2994 posts
  • Location:Under the sea

Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:53 PM

One can dream of Bond being brainwashed and killing her. But this would have fit post CR, not post QOS.

As for Q, what would be the use ? My phone can do all the thing Q showed to Bond in episodes 2-20.

#18 Vanya86

Vanya86

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 93 posts
  • Location:Wales

Posted 07 December 2008 - 07:22 PM

and the change of my subtitle: my original one wasnt a dig at Welsh people .......

Never thought it was, I'm just happier now it's is being presented as opinion and speculation. I only mentioned it because I assumed you changed it yourself, didn't realise it was an admin decision.

Well that's a good point, Dench is 73 but I really dont think she will leave as M until Craig does his run.

So why not a Q in his 70's? But we'll see I guess.

But, Dench was 61 when she first took the role and Llewelyn as 50. Right now it think it would be unrealistic to cast someone with a view to them playing the role for the next 30 years, but you do need to find some middle ground. I think early 70's is fine, especially in this day and age, if, hypothetically, you were to suggest and 80+ actor that would be pushing it.

Edited by Vanya86, 07 December 2008 - 07:24 PM.


#19 danslittlefinger

danslittlefinger

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3680 posts
  • Location:“If not here . . . then elsewhere.”

Posted 07 December 2008 - 07:26 PM

and the change of my subtitle: my original one wasnt a dig at Welsh people .......

Never thought it was, I'm just happier now it's is being presented as opinion and speculation. I only mentioned it because I assumed you changed it yourself, didn't realise it was an admin decision.

Well that's a good point, Dench is 73 but I really dont think she will leave as M until Craig does his run.

So why not a Q in his 70's? But we'll see I guess.

But, Dench was 61 when she first took the role and Llewelyn as 50. Right now it think it would be unrealistic to cast someone with a view to them playing the role for the next 30 years, but you do need to find some middle ground. I think early 70's is fine, especially in this day and age, if, hypothetically, you were to suggest and 80+ actor that would be pushing it.



Good points, all of them. :(

#20 Double-Oh Agent

Double-Oh Agent

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4325 posts

Posted 08 December 2008 - 06:03 AM

I think they should make Q Major Boothroyd from now on, make him a really hard :(, he won't take none of Bond's cheek.

But Q is Maj. Boothroyd. From Dr. No with Peter Burton through The World Is Not Enough with Desmond Llewelyn, the series' gadgetmeister has been the same character. In Dr. No, Burton's character is called Maj. Boothroyd as is Llewelyn's in The Spy Who Loved Me, not to mention that Llewelyn is called Q throughout the series, hence Boothroyd is Q.

Only John Cleese's Quartermaster in Die Another Day was not Maj. Boothroyd since he also appeared in TWINE alongside Llewelyn's Q.

My choice for the new Q would be Hugh Lawrie.

#21 DR76

DR76

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1673 posts

Posted 08 December 2008 - 06:25 AM

What the hell? EON Productions doesn't even know what their next Bond film will be about and they've already casted Q? Oh brother! The "Age of Cheese" returns.

#22 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 08 December 2008 - 07:30 AM

As for Q, what would be the use ? My phone can do all the thing Q showed to Bond in episodes 2-20.


It can help you breathe underwater?

:( me.

#23 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 08 December 2008 - 09:25 AM

Wait, who's Graham Rye and why does his opinion matter?

Oh, wait, that's right ... it doesn't.

#24 Bradley De La Cloche

Bradley De La Cloche

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Jersey

Posted 08 December 2008 - 09:52 AM

Madoc and Crowden are good actors (I've seen their work on Doctor Who), but I think they're a tad too old to be playing a potentially long-running character.

Edited by Bradley De La Cloche, 08 December 2008 - 09:54 AM.


#25 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 08 December 2008 - 11:58 AM

I thought Graham Rye hasn't really liked a Bond film since 1847 so why are his thoughts on a long dead character even relevant? I suppose that if Q was reintroduced he would enable Rye to talk about more plot instead of and decent discourse about cinema and James Bond films.

Could we at least call this what it is. Madoc is this Graham Rye guy's choice for Q, nothing more.

Exactly.

And a rather staid suggestion at that. I don't think Graham Rye has clicked that James Bond films didn't drift since 1969. They changed. As did cinema and the world. To pine for an era that seriously ended 40 years ago is a tad desperate.

Appreciate the change in heading. To be fair my comment was directed more at the article itself, whoever wrote it had no right to proclaim “Philip Madoc is on Q to be James Bond star ” based on nothing more than someone on the internet's personal preference.

While we're naming names and posting photos here's my choice: Colin Baker
Posted Image
That's right, Dr Who no. 6. He's an incredibly underrated actor, a familiar face but not so well known as to dominate the screen, we know he can play an eccentric genius and isn't likely to be tied up with other projects. And at 65 he shouldn't fall into the too old category.

God no.

He's not a familiar face to anyone other than DOCTOR WHO fans.

And since when did Q have to be played as an eccentric genius?

#26 jamie00007

jamie00007

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 555 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 08 December 2008 - 12:13 PM

I would prefer that the next Q is a little younger than his mid-70's (or close to 80 by the time the movie rolls around) when he does his first film... Id like to see the next actor established in the role and be around for a good long time to come. Realistically, how many movies could we expect to see a 74 year old in?

If the movies were a one off, fair enough, but the next Q (like M or Moneypenny) should be chosen with the idea in mind that they will be regulars in the series for a good long while. They should be looking for someone around 50-60, someone who could concievably be around for four or five films.

Edited by jamie00007, 08 December 2008 - 12:14 PM.


#27 Lounge Lizard

Lounge Lizard

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 593 posts
  • Location:Amsterdam, Netherlands

Posted 08 December 2008 - 01:30 PM

I think Eon will need somebody younger and edgier than the gentlemen proposed by Rye. Last week I saw Ridley Scott's Body of Lies, and one of the few things I liked about the film was Simon McBurney as a more 'modern', slightly 'cooler' Q type character.

Why not cast someone like McBurney, or... the great Bill Nighy?

Nighy is not Sixty yet, he can be fussy and cool at the same time. He has my vote!

#28 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 08 December 2008 - 01:44 PM

Whoever would get cast in this role would not be "Q like" at all - not if that role was anything like the changes made since 2006. Just because someone was "like Q" in one film does not make them a shoe-in.

The character doesn't even need to return. Not if its just the fans who need appeasing.

#29 Lounge Lizard

Lounge Lizard

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 593 posts
  • Location:Amsterdam, Netherlands

Posted 08 December 2008 - 01:50 PM

Whoever would get cast in this role would not be "Q like" at all - not if that role was anything like the changes made since 2006. Just because someone was "like Q" in one film does not make them a shoe-in.


Not suggesting that anyone is a shoe-in for anything, just that a Q like character in another film gave me some ideas for a new casting approach in the Bond series.

#30 Skudor

Skudor

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9286 posts
  • Location:Buckinghamshire

Posted 08 December 2008 - 01:59 PM

If they have to reintroduce Q they should be aiming for someone around 50 - go too young and you just have a typical geek character and go too old and it's just not realistic. Personally I think they should just avoid Q for now. Llewellyn owned the role, to me it just doesn't make sense without him.