Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

The Times review by Kevin Maher


12 replies to this topic

#1 dr. watson

dr. watson

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 19 posts

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:14 PM

Just to add more fuel to the fire, this is a review from today's Times which is I think, spot on.

A Spying Shame, Quantum of Solace is a dull and uninvolving outing for James Bond. (he gives it 1 Star).

Following Casino Royale- a film that managed to be supremely enjoyable while boldly rebooting Bond for the 21st Century- was never going to be easy. Yet it is hard to describe the level of disappointment that Quantum of Solace has managed to engender (in this reviewer at least). Squandering all the former film's energy, charm and complex character work, director Forster and his three screenwriters, as well as an agonisingly dull turn from star Craig, have mistaken motion for action, convolution for intrigue and pouty intransigence for mood.

The mess begins with a meaningless car-chase opener. All jagged jump-cuts, it conveys nothing more than the fact Bond can drive fast (note: the action throughout this movie is particularly uninvolving, like a poor episode of the A-Team that has been tarted up with a $200 million budget). Soon and via a single laundered banknote from Casino Royale's Le Chiffre, Bond is off to Haiti, Austria and Bolivia, hot on the trail of the pseudo environmentalist :( global megalomaniac Dominic Greene. The latter must surely go down as the most ineffective villain in Bond history. Greene plans to take control of Bolivia's water supply, to run their water companies and, get this, to charge very high prices! Which is, of course all very Austin Powers, and certainly not worthy of a franchise that, at it's best, never confuses the fantastical with the credible.

And this is perhaps the fatal flaw of Quantum of Solace - it presumes that injecting Bond with reality is good enough in itself. And that having a glum gadgetless and humourless hero who faces up to duplicitous governments can create a frisson of excitement to compensate for the fact that the entire franchise, in one egrigious film, has gone completely off the rails.

#2 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:17 PM

"An agonisingly dull turn from star Craig..."

That comment suggests the review is being controversial for the sake of it. Not a single previous review, even the negative ones, have tried to make such a claim.

#3 Mr_Wint

Mr_Wint

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2406 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:27 PM

"An agonisingly dull turn from star Craig..."

That comment suggests the review is being controversial for the sake of it. Not a single previous review, even the negative ones, have tried to make such a claim.

Craig did look somewhat less motivated this time.

#4 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:28 PM

He's motivated by his duty. :(

#5 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:35 PM

"An agonisingly dull turn from star Craig..."

That comment suggests the review is being controversial for the sake of it. Not a single previous review, even the negative ones, have tried to make such a claim.

Craig did look somewhat less motivated this time.

Yes, in some respects, I agree that his performance wasn't quite as perfect as in CASINO ROYALE. However, describing him as "agonisingly dull" seems far too extreme.

#6 Mr_Wint

Mr_Wint

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2406 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:39 PM

Yes, I still think Craig was ok. He did the best he could with the material he got (and that wasn't much).

#7 SPOTTER

SPOTTER

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 126 posts

Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:59 PM

I thought Craig was good but the film just was not Bond and it's as simple as that.

Edited by SPOTTER, 02 November 2008 - 07:00 PM.


#8 NATO Sub

NATO Sub

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 182 posts
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:10 AM

Is Kevin Maher a member of CBN? If not, why post this in member reviews? :(

#9 Mr_Wint

Mr_Wint

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2406 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:35 AM

Is Kevin Maher a member of CBN? If not, why post this in member reviews? :(

He became a honorary member after this review.

#10 Bond Bug

Bond Bug

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 879 posts

Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:42 AM

I agree with that review and his comments about Craig. I believe history will view this movie as a very poor entry.

#11 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:57 AM

The latter must surely go down as the most ineffective villain in Bond history. Greene plans to take control of Bolivia's water supply, to run their water companies and, get this, to charge very high prices! Which is, of course all very Austin Powers, and certainly not worthy of a franchise that, at it's best, never confuses the fantastical with the credible.

To determine the price of water is ineffective? It is also "very Austin Powers"? C´mon, Austin Powers´s Dr.Evil likes to have hollowed out volcanoes and is out of touch with inflation. But his schemes have nothing to do with Greene´s.

Another reviewer who hopes to be funny but disregards the facts. Hopefully he will never be subject to a guy like Greene who charges unpayable prices for a natural resource.

#12 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:57 AM

I agree with that review and his comments about Craig. I believe history will view this movie as a very poor entry.

I think you couldn't be more wrong. Time will tell.

#13 avl

avl

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 871 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 04 November 2008 - 10:02 AM

The latter must surely go down as the most ineffective villain in Bond history. Greene plans to take control of Bolivia's water supply, to run their water companies and, get this, to charge very high prices! Which is, of course all very Austin Powers, and certainly not worthy of a franchise that, at it's best, never confuses the fantastical with the credible.

To determine the price of water is ineffective? It is also "very Austin Powers"? C´mon, Austin Powers´s Dr.Evil likes to have hollowed out volcanoes and is out of touch with inflation. But his schemes have nothing to do with Greene´s.

Another reviewer who hopes to be funny but disregards the facts. Hopefully he will never be subject to a guy like Greene who charges unpayable prices for a natural resource.

Yes - the conclusion he draws seems utterly at odds with the example he gives!