The Times review by Kevin Maher
#1
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:14 PM
A Spying Shame, Quantum of Solace is a dull and uninvolving outing for James Bond. (he gives it 1 Star).
Following Casino Royale- a film that managed to be supremely enjoyable while boldly rebooting Bond for the 21st Century- was never going to be easy. Yet it is hard to describe the level of disappointment that Quantum of Solace has managed to engender (in this reviewer at least). Squandering all the former film's energy, charm and complex character work, director Forster and his three screenwriters, as well as an agonisingly dull turn from star Craig, have mistaken motion for action, convolution for intrigue and pouty intransigence for mood.
The mess begins with a meaningless car-chase opener. All jagged jump-cuts, it conveys nothing more than the fact Bond can drive fast (note: the action throughout this movie is particularly uninvolving, like a poor episode of the A-Team that has been tarted up with a $200 million budget). Soon and via a single laundered banknote from Casino Royale's Le Chiffre, Bond is off to Haiti, Austria and Bolivia, hot on the trail of the pseudo environmentalist global megalomaniac Dominic Greene. The latter must surely go down as the most ineffective villain in Bond history. Greene plans to take control of Bolivia's water supply, to run their water companies and, get this, to charge very high prices! Which is, of course all very Austin Powers, and certainly not worthy of a franchise that, at it's best, never confuses the fantastical with the credible.
And this is perhaps the fatal flaw of Quantum of Solace - it presumes that injecting Bond with reality is good enough in itself. And that having a glum gadgetless and humourless hero who faces up to duplicitous governments can create a frisson of excitement to compensate for the fact that the entire franchise, in one egrigious film, has gone completely off the rails.
#2
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:17 PM
That comment suggests the review is being controversial for the sake of it. Not a single previous review, even the negative ones, have tried to make such a claim.
#3
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:27 PM
Craig did look somewhat less motivated this time."An agonisingly dull turn from star Craig..."
That comment suggests the review is being controversial for the sake of it. Not a single previous review, even the negative ones, have tried to make such a claim.
#4
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:28 PM
#5
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:35 PM
Yes, in some respects, I agree that his performance wasn't quite as perfect as in CASINO ROYALE. However, describing him as "agonisingly dull" seems far too extreme.Craig did look somewhat less motivated this time."An agonisingly dull turn from star Craig..."
That comment suggests the review is being controversial for the sake of it. Not a single previous review, even the negative ones, have tried to make such a claim.
#6
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:39 PM
#7
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:59 PM
Edited by SPOTTER, 02 November 2008 - 07:00 PM.
#8
Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:10 AM
#9
Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:35 AM
He became a honorary member after this review.Is Kevin Maher a member of CBN? If not, why post this in member reviews?
#10
Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:42 AM
#11
Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:57 AM
To determine the price of water is ineffective? It is also "very Austin Powers"? C´mon, Austin Powers´s Dr.Evil likes to have hollowed out volcanoes and is out of touch with inflation. But his schemes have nothing to do with Greene´s.
Another reviewer who hopes to be funny but disregards the facts. Hopefully he will never be subject to a guy like Greene who charges unpayable prices for a natural resource.
#12
Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:57 AM
I think you couldn't be more wrong. Time will tell.I agree with that review and his comments about Craig. I believe history will view this movie as a very poor entry.
#13
Posted 04 November 2008 - 10:02 AM
Yes - the conclusion he draws seems utterly at odds with the example he gives!The latter must surely go down as the most ineffective villain in Bond history. Greene plans to take control of Bolivia's water supply, to run their water companies and, get this, to charge very high prices! Which is, of course all very Austin Powers, and certainly not worthy of a franchise that, at it's best, never confuses the fantastical with the credible.
To determine the price of water is ineffective? It is also "very Austin Powers"? C´mon, Austin Powers´s Dr.Evil likes to have hollowed out volcanoes and is out of touch with inflation. But his schemes have nothing to do with Greene´s.
Another reviewer who hopes to be funny but disregards the facts. Hopefully he will never be subject to a guy like Greene who charges unpayable prices for a natural resource.