Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Quantum of Solace - Spoiler-Free Review


15 replies to this topic

#1 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 31 October 2008 - 05:43 PM

There are plenty of reviews knocking around now that rattle off lengthy bumph that's not really important or start describing what happens in the film, so I'll keep this short, punchy and juicy (just like the film).

Quantum of Solace opens with a metaphorical, deep, powerful and calculating cinematographical breath in expectance of the wild ride to follow. What is then delivered is a burst of hard-hitting and slick action and a very strong title sequence which certainly improves the song. Not a great Bond song in my opinion, but it's grown on me somewhat and works pretty well with the theme and style. The action has been talked about a lot in many if not all reviews, and while I can understand some not liking it's intense, shocking and close-in style I thought it was pulled off very well indeed. Throughout the film we get many action sequences of a wide variety, but each one held me captivated. I had read so much about how the action completely dominates the film. I dissagree, and felt there was plenty of quiet scenes, some of which were extremely powerful in terms of character development and acting. While the plot is very multi-layered and intricate I could follow it fine, but no doubt it was easier having known Casino Royale well as well as having read the basic synopsis and knowing some other bits and pieces beforehand. The characters and acting throughout is consistently very good, only with the odd slip up but no problems with any of the major players. I was more impressed with Olga Kurylenko than I expected to be, she did herself proud and is a genuinely likeable, tough, modern woman. None of this attitude and bitchyness combined with poor acting that these kinds of Bond girls usually are. Mr White is extra creepy, Dominic Greene played solidly and, while not a notably grandiose villain, quite solid and unlikeable as a cog in the Quantum machine. General Medrano turned out to be quite the hate figure of the story for me and as the film went on I really wanted him to die, despite his character not taking center stage all that much.

To get quickly onto niggles I have to say they were few and usually not that big of a deal, I just have to go through them as this is a review. Some intricate details in the plot are not really explained or fully dealt with. This is more of a negative for the casual viewers as any actual Bond fans here will easily be able to and enjoy working things out. The finale showdown and the plot surrounding it is rushed into a tad too quickly which is no doubt where some reviewers have felt short changed; it leaves little room for a satisfying build up and sense of purpose about the villains demise. The various labels of places visited in the film with large and fancy fonts seemed a little un-Bond really, though not distasteful at all. The waiter who recites the Vesper recipe made me cringe, a very laboured and somewhat embarrassing piece of unnecessary dialogue. Gemma Arterton's delivery of her first line in the film is pretty bad, but thankfully she was fine for the rest of her part, so no worries really. I really enjoyed the little joke about her name (check the credits).

The film held me captivated and enthralled throughout with some real emotional reactions. All together it feels like a really interesting and slick little Bond film with depth and grit to boot. More importantly however I feel that it's an absolutely superb add-on to Casino Royale with just the right amount of a twist in the style. I enjoyed seeing Daniel Craig rattle off some fluent Spanish, unlike Brosnan's occasional and poorly accented "Buenos Dias" and "Gracias" in Die Another Day.

Again this film has a small epilogue style ending which is really well done and certainly rounds off the whole story (carried through from Casino Royale) perfectly. The very end of Quantum of Solace is a good solid cap on the end of the two films. I also can't wait to find out more about Quantum, scary stuff. All in all I think there are many reviews out there that are highly missleading, but then again we're all different. Being a huge and original fan of the Fleming books I found a lot of Fleming touches and character in this film, and the various references and nods in style etc to the old classic Bond films were very nicely done. This is without doubt the darkest, grittiest and most hard-hitting 007 film so far, but it is still very lush, exotic and fantastical at the same time - a difficult and rare combination to get. It is certainly not like a Bourne film as has been mentioned and worried about. I hope the next film with the great Daniel Craig will see 007 enjoying a little more relaxation and luxury, as I think he's earned it! Some more classic Bond shots such as Craig in a shoulder holster with his jacket off perhaps enjoying the comfort of a plush hotel suite. Oh and long live the Walther PPK! Glad to see it back.

I feel 8.5/10 is my rating for it, and that's a very high score. Casino Royale and each of my other very favourite Bond films get a 9. There's still room for a 9.5 or that elusive and utterly perfect 10, but that would require something very very special.

A final and humorous note: did you ever notice the emails in Bond's laptop in Casino Royale? He has one entitled "Stationary Request". Look out for Bond's mention of stationary in this film, I think Craig's Bond has some particular thing for it, the perfect christmas present for him would be a gift voucher for Staples, though I can't imagine Bond ever buying these things. :( M's use of the S word is fantastic too, I really wasn't expecting it and it was used effectively.


Enjoy the film when you get to see it!

Signing off. :)

#2 The Dove

The Dove

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16671 posts
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 31 October 2008 - 05:51 PM

Excellent review Leon!! This is what I was hoping for. An 8.5-9 out of 10 will make Quantum of Solace a winner in my book. :) :(

#3 Loeffelholz

Loeffelholz

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 337 posts
  • Location:Springfield, Illinois

Posted 31 October 2008 - 05:52 PM

Glad to read your review, Leon. It's tough to be a Yank in the current climate...two weeks to wait for the film is just intolerable.

#4 HildebrandRarity

HildebrandRarity

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4361 posts

Posted 31 October 2008 - 05:53 PM

Thanks.

I've now raised my expectations - after having lowered them a few days ago - to a 7.25 in the hope of getting dealt an 8.5 as well. :(

#5 MattofSteel

MattofSteel

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2482 posts
  • Location:Waterloo, ON

Posted 31 October 2008 - 05:56 PM

Some encouraging reviews are coming regularly from the fans, now. Interesting.

#6 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:00 PM

Thanks.

I've now raised my expectations - after having lowered them a few days ago - to a 7.25 in the hope of getting dealt an 8.5 as well. :(


Good, I'm glad to hear it. It's a brilliant and incredibly entertaining film with a lot of artistic touch. I think some of the bad reviews may stem from something Fry says in Futurama where they are trying to stage their own "Single Female Lawyer" episode to save earth:

"Clever things make people feel stupid, and unexpected things make them feel scared!"

I have a broader image of what 007 is as well as can be from my enjoyment of the novels, and I am also not really a humper of the worn-out formula. I put everything I'd heard about the film out of my mind, watched the very end of Casino Royale before I went to meet my friends and just took it all in as it happened. There are a lot of little touches to spot and there is plenty of re-watch value in this film. It's darkness and intensity will require waiting a little before watching it again, but I will definately go again on an Orange wednesday.

#7 volante

volante

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1926 posts
  • Location:GCHQ

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:18 PM

Thanks for a very accurate review of the film.
I watched it this afternoon @ 14.45 and thoroughly enjoyed it.

I have followed every production review and fallen for the hype and the glitz.

It was actually a relief when it got underway.

Yes it's a rollercoaster ride.
Yes there are some tender moments.
and yes, Bond has got his head in the right place for the next edition.

I thought it was rushed, and would have prefered more "Bond" music.

But I can overlook that.

#8 Bureau Of Weapons

Bureau Of Weapons

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 60 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:19 PM

I have a broader image of what 007 is as well as can be from my enjoyment of the novels, and I am also not really a humper of the worn-out formula. I put everything I'd heard about the film out of my mind, watched the very end of Casino Royale before I went to meet my friends and just took it all in as it happened. There are a lot of little touches to spot and there is plenty of re-watch value in this film. It's darkness and intensity will require waiting a little before watching it again, but I will definately go again on an Orange wednesday.


I agree that if you're open minded as to what ingrediants can constitute a Bond film you will find QOS less disagreeable.

It's a brave and starke take on the usual formula and it's sad that EON wont get any kudos for this.

#9 Dangerous Liaison

Dangerous Liaison

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 80 posts

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:24 PM

Thank you so much Leon!

Your review has (as stated from other members) raised my expectations. Once watching QoS on Nov 14th, I'll go after you and Zorin if what you guys wrote is utter hogwash! (I joke of course. :()

#10 Loeffelholz

Loeffelholz

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 337 posts
  • Location:Springfield, Illinois

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:26 PM

I have a broader image of what 007 is as well as can be from my enjoyment of the novels, and I am also not really a humper of the worn-out formula. I put everything I'd heard about the film out of my mind, watched the very end of Casino Royale before I went to meet my friends and just took it all in as it happened. There are a lot of little touches to spot and there is plenty of re-watch value in this film. It's darkness and intensity will require waiting a little before watching it again, but I will definately go again on an Orange wednesday.


I agree that if you're open minded as to what ingrediants can constitute a Bond film you will find QOS less disagreeable.

It's a brave and starke take on the usual formula and it's sad that EON wont get any kudos for this.


I'm in this camp as well. A strength of the Bond canon is that it has evolved to survive.

P.S. Leon, I miss you from the old days, on 'another site.' Good to see you still around here...

#11 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:35 PM

I thought it was rushed, and would have prefered more "Bond" music.

But I can overlook that.


Parts of it were a little rushed indeed, certainly not the whole film as I was lead to believe, and the downplaying of the Bond theme seems to just be what David Arnold is going for lately. There are small snippets of it but a little more would have been good in a major action sequence. It is a nice kind of prize at the end of the film though.

#12 Loeffelholz

Loeffelholz

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 337 posts
  • Location:Springfield, Illinois

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:37 PM

Roger that. Hint taken.

#13 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 31 October 2008 - 06:38 PM

Thank you so much Leon!

Your review has (as stated from other members) raised my expectations. Once watching QoS on Nov 14th, I'll go after you and Zorin if what you guys wrote is utter hogwash! (I joke of course. :))


Haha, you'[re welcome. And feel free to make your own judgement and dissagree. All I can promise you here is that this is 100% what I think of the film :(

To Lofty, thanks and yes I am not against the expansion and improvement (as I call it) on the Bond films. I am fully aware that it could go horribly wrong, but it certainly hasn't here and I very much doubt we won't see the return of other classic Bond elements in the near future. Re-worked of course.

#14 ACE

ACE

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4543 posts

Posted 31 October 2008 - 11:14 PM

There are plenty of reviews knocking around now that rattle off lengthy bumph that's not really important or start describing what happens in the film, so I'll keep this short, punchy and juicy (just like the film).

Quantum of Solace opens with a metaphorical, deep, powerful and calculating cinematographical breath in expectance of the wild ride to follow. What is then delivered is a burst of hard-hitting and slick action and a very strong title sequence which certainly improves the song. Not a great Bond song in my opinion, but it's grown on me somewhat and works pretty well with the theme and style. The action has been talked about a lot in many if not all reviews, and while I can understand some not liking it's intense, shocking and close-in style I thought it was pulled off very well indeed. Throughout the film we get many action sequences of a wide variety, but each one held me captivated. I had read so much about how the action completely dominates the film. I dissagree, and felt there was plenty of quiet scenes, some of which were extremely powerful in terms of character development and acting. While the plot is very multi-layered and intricate I could follow it fine, but no doubt it was easier having known Casino Royale well as well as having read the basic synopsis and knowing some other bits and pieces beforehand. The characters and acting throughout is consistently very good, only with the odd slip up but no problems with any of the major players. I was more impressed with Olga Kurylenko than I expected to be, she did herself proud and is a genuinely likeable, tough, modern woman. None of this attitude and bitchyness combined with poor acting that these kinds of Bond girls usually are. Mr White is extra creepy, Dominic Greene played solidly and, while not a notably grandiose villain, quite solid and unlikeable as a cog in the Quantum machine. General Medrano turned out to be quite the hate figure of the story for me and as the film went on I really wanted him to die, despite his character not taking center stage all that much.

To get quickly onto niggles I have to say they were few and usually not that big of a deal, I just have to go through them as this is a review. Some intricate details in the plot are not really explained or fully dealt with. This is more of a negative for the casual viewers as any actual Bond fans here will easily be able to and enjoy working things out. The finale showdown and the plot surrounding it is rushed into a tad too quickly which is no doubt where some reviewers have felt short changed; it leaves little room for a satisfying build up and sense of purpose about the villains demise. The various labels of places visited in the film with large and fancy fonts seemed a little un-Bond really, though not distasteful at all. The waiter who recites the Vesper recipe made me cringe, a very laboured and somewhat embarrassing piece of unnecessary dialogue. Gemma Arterton's delivery of her first line in the film is pretty bad, but thankfully she was fine for the rest of her part, so no worries really. I really enjoyed the little joke about her name (check the credits).

The film held me captivated and enthralled throughout with some real emotional reactions. All together it feels like a really interesting and slick little Bond film with depth and grit to boot. More importantly however I feel that it's an absolutely superb add-on to Casino Royale with just the right amount of a twist in the style. I enjoyed seeing Daniel Craig rattle off some fluent Spanish, unlike Brosnan's occasional and poorly accented "Buenos Dias" and "Gracias" in Die Another Day.

Again this film has a small epilogue style ending which is really well done and certainly rounds off the whole story (carried through from Casino Royale) perfectly. The very end of Quantum of Solace is a good solid cap on the end of the two films. I also can't wait to find out more about Quantum, scary stuff. All in all I think there are many reviews out there that are highly missleading, but then again we're all different. Being a huge and original fan of the Fleming books I found a lot of Fleming touches and character in this film, and the various references and nods in style etc to the old classic Bond films were very nicely done. This is without doubt the darkest, grittiest and most hard-hitting 007 film so far, but it is still very lush, exotic and fantastical at the same time - a difficult and rare combination to get. It is certainly not like a Bourne film as has been mentioned and worried about. I hope the next film with the great Daniel Craig will see 007 enjoying a little more relaxation and luxury, as I think he's earned it! Some more classic Bond shots such as Craig in a shoulder holster with his jacket off perhaps enjoying the comfort of a plush hotel suite. Oh and long live the Walther PPK! Glad to see it back.

I feel 8.5/10 is my rating for it, and that's a very high score. Casino Royale and each of my other very favourite Bond films get a 9. There's still room for a 9.5 or that elusive and utterly perfect 10, but that would require something very very special.

A final and humorous note: did you ever notice the emails in Bond's laptop in Casino Royale? He has one entitled "Stationary Request". Look out for Bond's mention of stationary in this film, I think Craig's Bond has some particular thing for it, the perfect christmas present for him would be a gift voucher for Staples, though I can't imagine Bond ever buying these things. :) M's use of the S word is fantastic too, I really wasn't expecting it and it was used effectively.


Enjoy the film when you get to see it!

Signing off. :D



Good, I'm glad to hear it. It's a brilliant and incredibly entertaining film with a lot of artistic touch. I think some of the bad reviews may stem from something Fry says in Futurama where they are trying to stage their own "Single Female Lawyer" episode to save earth:

"Clever things make people feel stupid, and unexpected things make them feel scared!"
I have a broader image of what 007 is as well as can be from my enjoyment of the novels, and I am also not really a humper of the worn-out formula. I put everything I'd heard about the film out of my mind, watched the very end of Casino Royale before I went to meet my friends and just took it all in as it happened. There are a lot of little touches to spot and there is plenty of re-watch value in this film. It's darkness and intensity will require waiting a little before watching it again, but I will definately go again on an Orange wednesday.



Parts of it were a little rushed indeed, certainly not the whole film as I was lead to believe, and the downplaying of the Bond theme seems to just be what David Arnold is going for lately. There are small snippets of it but a little more would have been good in a major action sequence. It is a nice kind of prize at the end of the film though.



Haha, you'[re welcome. And feel free to make your own judgement and dissagree. All I can promise you here is that this is 100% what I think of the film :)

To Lofty, thanks and yes I am not against the expansion and improvement (as I call it) on the Bond films. I am fully aware that it could go horribly wrong, but it certainly hasn't here and I very much doubt we won't see the return of other classic Bond elements in the near future. Re-worked of course.


Leon, you really are The Professional! ;) Such wise, wise words. Such insightful points. Loved it :(

#15 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 01 November 2008 - 02:18 AM

:( Thanks for all the compliments, I thought to post a review here as soon as I got home as I wanted to share my thorough enjoyment of the film to those still unable to see it and worried about all of the bad reviews. I really think the extremely bad reviews are just ridiculous, it just shows how different people can feel about the same thing.

Feel free to ask questions, if you want spoilers from my point of view I will just spoiler tag them for highlighting.

#16 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 06 November 2008 - 12:24 AM

I saw it again today and thought i'd give my second watch additions.

It was better the second time! I knew everything that was happening this time and even the fast editing was easier to follow (though not particularly difficult the first time as some found it).

I noticed even more quality in the acting also, i'm very impressed with Olga Kurylenko considering her lack of experience relative to the big, experienced acting names she was working against (Dame Judi Dench, Mathieu Amalric, Daniel Craig).

None of the emotional impact and wow factor from the first viewing was lost. In the same way I am sure you also may find the wince factor never gets lost on re-watching Casino Royale's torture scene. Fantastic.

A final note on the gunbarrel, as many people seem very very interested in the speciics. It's definitely a great gunbarrel, I made sure to watch carefully. It is a little zoomed-in, that can be the only complaint, but not motably more than Brosnan's was. Craig's firing stance is quite reminiscent of Dalton's only a bit better IMO.