Did Eric Serra have something against the Bond theme?
#1
Posted 26 August 2002 - 03:31 PM
It just seemed that Serra wanted nothing to do with the Bond theme, and as a result, the movie suffered, not a lot, but a bit.
#2
Posted 26 August 2002 - 03:47 PM
#3
Posted 26 August 2002 - 03:50 PM
#4
Posted 26 August 2002 - 04:26 PM
#5
Posted 26 August 2002 - 06:56 PM
#6
Posted 26 August 2002 - 07:02 PM
I was referring to the more traditional use of the theme though, such as during the tank chase.
The typical orchestra simply isn't Serra's style, he's a synth man normally (an obvious point if you've heard some of his other scores), I feel that "Tank Chase" by Robert Altman, which substituted Serra's brilliant "A Pleasent Drive Through St. Petersburg" was placed during the chase by producer's request.
All in all, I love Serra's score, as I love all of the "one-off" Bond composer's scores!
#7
Posted 26 August 2002 - 08:05 PM
#8
Posted 27 August 2002 - 11:20 AM
I own the "Bond Back In Action 2" CD and I recently listened to the tank drive music that was used in the movie; I don't think that John Altman's version of the theme was that much better than Serra's original track. When you watch the tank scene and hear the music simultaneously, you will see that Altman's score is quite lame.
#9
Posted 06 September 2002 - 09:16 AM
I think what's most likely is that he got a lousy brief and he didn't really understand Bond - not necessarily his fault, but the worst score and soundtrack by a mile IMO.
#10
Posted 15 September 2002 - 04:47 PM
#11
Posted 15 September 2002 - 07:48 PM
Now onto Serra's score. It was weak in the way that it wasn't Bond. That's ok, if you're trying to take a new direction. But I personally believe that GE shouldn't have gone as dark and modern as it did. It should've come blaring "BOND IS BACK!" in the style of TSWLM and now DAD. GE was great film. It just lacked Bondiness. It feels more like an action movie and less like Bond, but it is saved by it's great dialogue and plot.
Serra's score shouldn't have been used. It should've been given to someone who actually understood Bond music. Serra was different, and I appreciate that, but it was too different. Nearly eliminating the Bond theme and using dark voices and sounds doesn't work. The score for the GE N64 video game beats the score of the film, which is a sad, sad, thing.
#12
Posted 16 September 2002 - 05:49 PM
#13
Posted 16 September 2002 - 07:52 PM
Serra's main weakness lies in the fact he didn't use enough brass and relied too much on synth sounds and re-doing the Bond theme. Let's face it, the Bond theme should be done traditionally at least ONCE in a Bond film. Serra failed to live even up to that. His GoldenEye overture is an interesting piece, and I do like it, but I think it would have been vastly improved if it had been performed with full orchestra. The brass, which is (in my humble opinion) one of the defining points of a score, is nonexistant. However, he did perfectly score the film, and defined the mood of GoldenEye.
However, when comparing the cues of Arnold and Serra, one immediately sees a contrast - such as Backseat Driver up against his original A Pleasant Drive Through St. Petersburg. Serra's Tank Chase is a terrible piece of music from any way you look at it, regardless of it being Bond or not. Arnold's Backseat Driver, though, is a fun and wonderful piece that both sums up the whole of James Bond.
Arnold does have his weakness, but I think having the Bond theme play in the scene where Bond and Dr. Jones escapes from the silo was nessecary. It fits so perfectly, and regardless of whether its a cliche or not, it works.
Now when you compare the lack of the Bond theme in Moonraker to the lack of the theme in GoldenEye, you get two completely different things. While Moonraker was a highly melodic score that was very beautiful and still represented Bond, GoldenEye was a score that's dissappearance of the Bond theme made it weak. The music itself is quite boring, when placed apart from the film. There's no beauty in it, and that's its weakness. I have no doubt that Arnold could do a Bond score without using the Bond theme, but Serra's would be a terrible mess. The cue Serra uses for the race between Bond and Xenya is a horrible mismatched cue that shouldn't have been written, as with his finale piece with Trevelyan and Bond fighting. He definitely should have included a more traditional Bond theme piece at the end - after all, this is Bond reclaiming his throne. Just a few thoughts.
#14
Posted 17 September 2002 - 06:11 PM
#15
Posted 17 September 2002 - 07:37 PM
Arnold on the other hand has been able to capture the Bond spirit, while being original, I dont think you can judge someone on how often they use the Bond theme, its up to the composer when they feel it should be used, the closest Serra got to the Bond theme was the gunbarrel music he used.
Theres a reason Arnold keeps getting asked back. If Serra was so good, dont you think he'd be the composer still?
#16
Posted 17 September 2002 - 11:01 PM
Michael Wilson said in an interview, Arnold's writing is like 'the son of Barry'. They want that sound again. Wilson also said that Serra was 'a kind of an experiment'. This can be heard on the Region 1 DVD GoldenEye. Not Region 2, alas. The more the current producers stick to formula the less likely the boat rocks. You say Serras music has dated that it sounds very 90s - so which era does Barrys first scores come from? or the 70s? or the 80s? I remember in the 70s Barry's 60s scores being 'made fun of' because they sounded so 60s! And now look? All these things are caught up in fashions. What some1 today will think the best, 5/10/15/20 years from now they'll lambast, and the wheel turns...la de da..
#17
Posted 17 September 2002 - 11:58 PM
Rich
#18
Posted 18 September 2002 - 12:19 AM
I'm afraid I disagree to some extent, Rich, I like most of Serra's avant-garde score. Sure, it's a little leftfield for a Bond score but I believe it adds a great deal to the film. I love the Russian choir you hear during some sections of the soundtrack, an eerie representation of the ghosts of former Soviet Russia in my mind. The out-of-tune synthesised brass in The GoldenEye Overture I believe is a hark back to Bond's former musical style, and the timpani-Bond theme is wonderfully dramatic.
I'd call the score original, deeply atmospheric, even if it's not faithful to the music of old, it is still a wonderful soundtrack.*
(* apart from that crock of ****e called Experience Of Love)
#19
Posted 18 September 2002 - 02:46 AM
With that being said, Barry is asked back all the time, but you know what? He keeps turning them down, he usually asks for too much. He wanted to score the main title song for GE, the producers didnt want him to, so he walked. They came close to getting him for TND, instead he asked for too much money, the producers said no, he walked. Not sure about TWINE, but there were rumors that he was coming back for DAD, again, I bet he and the producers just cant get along, so he probably wont be back.
As for Arnold, his music is current, while having that Bond flavor, I favor TWINE over TND simply because TWINE feels like his score, TND feels too much like a "Best of Bond" and in that respect, I guess you could say he's not entirely original, but then again, he is the best composer for the series besides Barry. I certantly wouldnt want any of the other one shot composers back.
#20
Posted 18 September 2002 - 05:58 AM
I must say that i totally agree with you, the male russian chorus does do exactly what it is supposed to do, and i do respect that about the score. And the timpani drums at the beginning do represent a darker side to bond which i can also respect. But tracks like "ladies First" and Serra's version of "A Pleasant Drive Through St. Pete." just dont seem to fit the bond mood.
Rich
#21
Posted 18 September 2002 - 05:24 PM