In honer of our current reading in the Blades Literary Club:
Imagine if Timothy Dalton had never gotten the part of James Bond. If young, big haired, skinny Pierce Brosnan was not stuck in the role of Remington Steele due to contract issues.
Now imgaine if EON productions had decided to adapt the popular John Gardner novel: License Renewed.
Here is Pierce Brosnan starring in his first 007 adventure, way back in 1987:
http://img219.images...erenewedwo8.jpg
License Renewed Poster!
Started by
British Chap
, Aug 17 2006 05:18 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 August 2006 - 05:18 PM
#2
Posted 17 August 2006 - 05:23 PM
Nice job British Chap the image of Bond is a little Sharp though but you done a great job
#3
Posted 17 August 2006 - 06:20 PM
Now just photoshop away Brosnan and it will be even better.That guy just looks so......royal.(not a compliment)
#4
Posted 17 August 2006 - 07:32 PM
Incidentally, what is that shot of Brosnan from?
#5
Posted 17 August 2006 - 07:39 PM
Incidentally, what is that shot of Brosnan from?
Remington Steele
http://www.imdb.com/...ath_key=0083470
And IMO he looks great!
#6
Posted 17 August 2006 - 07:41 PM
Ah, thought so. Thanks.
.
.
#7
Posted 19 August 2006 - 09:58 AM
Nice job with the poster.
But I still think he looked too young for Bond in 86...
But I still think he looked too young for Bond in 86...
#8
Posted 19 August 2006 - 11:06 AM
agreed he needed a few cracks in his face
#9
Posted 21 August 2006 - 04:08 PM
He's a little pretty to be Bond, but I'd still see it
Amazing job on the poster (although with all that hair, I think Bond's "comma" of hair would end up being a pretty substantive parenthesis )
Amazing job on the poster (although with all that hair, I think Bond's "comma" of hair would end up being a pretty substantive parenthesis )
#10
Posted 08 September 2006 - 08:09 PM
Agree...he needed a bit more "aging" before he could play the part. In '86 Dalton was definitely the better choice.But I still think he looked too young for Bond in 86...