Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

For Your Eyes Only: Movie Vs. Book


9 replies to this topic

#1 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 03 April 2005 - 03:22 PM

'Tis a bit tricky in this case since the For Your Eyes Only collection has five short stories, but comparing the official film of the name to perhaps the stories that we used to create it (“Risico” and For Your Eyes Only for example), which do you prefer and why?

#2 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 12 April 2005 - 12:03 PM

*Bump* Anyone?

#3 DLibrasnow

DLibrasnow

    Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16568 posts
  • Location:Washington D.C.. USA

Posted 12 April 2005 - 01:41 PM

This is a very tricky question Devin. My favorite of the short stories is the title story but I prefer the movies setting and all to the short story. I am going to go with the movie on this one.

#4 Bon-san

Bon-san

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4124 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 12 April 2005 - 01:47 PM

I'm currently re-reading the book. Will comment when I finish. :)

#5 B007GLE

B007GLE

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 844 posts
  • Location:New York

Posted 12 April 2005 - 02:46 PM

I'm a little behind the group on this one having lent my nephew my copy of FYEO. I promise to contribute when I get it back and re-read the stories. I'd rather do it when its fresh in my mind.

#6 Gobi-1

Gobi-1

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1529 posts
  • Location:East Texas

Posted 08 May 2006 - 03:14 AM

I say the film because the producers and writers did an excellent job of combining two unrelated stories into a single whole.

#7 TheSaint

TheSaint

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3067 posts
  • Location:Bronx,NY

Posted 08 May 2006 - 04:01 AM

I say the film because the producers and writers did an excellent job of combining two unrelated stories into a single whole.


I'll second that motion.

#8 Flash1087

Flash1087

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1070 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 08 May 2006 - 04:38 AM

Yeah, movie for me too. I loved "Risico" and "From A View To A Kill" as short stories, but unless I'm forgetting one in there, I didn't really care for the rest of the short stories. FYEO as a movie, however, I find completely entertaining.

Oddly enough, during AMC's last Bond marathon, I happened to watch FYEO with a few folks I know who aren't as into Bond as I am and they all said it was the best one they'd ever seen. Go figure.

#9 MarcAngeDraco

MarcAngeDraco

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3312 posts
  • Location:Oxford, Michigan

Posted 08 May 2006 - 03:21 PM


I say the film because the producers and writers did an excellent job of combining two unrelated stories into a single whole.


I'll second that motion.


The sections of the film that are adapted from the short stories are actually quite good. It's really hard to argue when they use Fleming, and do it well!

#10 Genrewriter

Genrewriter

    Cammander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4360 posts
  • Location:South Pasadena, CA

Posted 08 May 2006 - 03:50 PM

I'm torn between the two. The film does a great job of adapting the two short stories it uses and is one of the best in the series, but the novel has The Hildebrand Rarity, my favorite short story.